PENGARUH INDIVIDUAL RANK PENGALAMAN KERJA DAN FIRM SIZE TERHADAP HASIL KERJA AUDITOR INTERN (Studi Terhadap Auditor Intern Emiten Sektor Manufaktur Di BEI)
Downloads
Financial fraud committed by companies in Indonesia and other countries is the reflection of the inability of management in maintaining and improving its internal control. If the internal audit can be properly implemented, it will offer a significant contribution in improving the process of corporate governance, risk management, and management control. The objectives of this research are to obtain empirical evidence and better understanding concerning: (1) ) the correlation between individual rank with working experience and firm size in manufacturing sector at the JSX; (2) the influence of individual rank, working experience, and firm size, on the internal auditors' outputs of public companies in manufacturing sector at the JSX either both partially or simultaneously.
The type of research employed in this study is causal relationship by using the census method for 120 internal auditors of public companies in manufacturing sector at the JSX. The data examined in this study consist of two types, namely primary and secondary data. Reliability and validity tests were conducted to examine the questionnaires. This study used SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) in examining the correlation as well as the effect of the variables being analyzed.
The results of this research revealed that: (1) there is correlation between individual rank and internal auditors' working experience (R2 =0.69), between individual rank and firm size (R2 = 0.69), and between internal auditors' working experience and firm size (R2 =0.52); (2) individual rank, working experience, and firm size, partially influence the internal auditors'output for which the levels of influence are 3%, 8%, and 3%, , respectively, whilst their simultaneous effect is 28% .
Aaker, D. A. 1992. Strategic Market Management.Third Edition. New York: John Wiley &Sons., Inc.
Afrizal. 1999. Beberapa Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pemilihan Metode Akuntansi dan Pelaporan Laba Perusahaan Manufaktur. Dipublikasikan).
Disertasi. Bandung: Program Pasca Sarjana UNPAD (Tidak
Agoes, Sukrisno. 2004. Auditing (Pemeriksaan Akuntan) oleh Kantor Akuntan Publik,. Edisi Ketiga. Jilid II. Jakarta: LP-FEUI.
________. 2005. Peranan Internal Audit Department, Enterprises Risk Management, dan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud dan Implikasinya kepada Peningkatan Mutu Lulusan Perguruan Tinggi di Indonesia. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap dalam Ilmu Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Tarumanagara. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Allport, G.W. 1937. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. Now York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. Arens, A.A., R.J. Elder and M.S. Beasly.2006. Auditing and Assurance Service, An Integrated Approach, 9th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:4-8, 11, 29, 32-34, 79.
Brayfield, A. and H. Rothe. 1951. An index of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol.35: 307-311. Buss, See A. H. 1989. Personality as Traits.American Psychologist. November:1378-1388.
Christiawan, Y.J. 2002. Kompetensi dan Independensi Akuntan Publik: Refleksi Hasil Penelitian Empiris.
Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro. Vol.4, No.2, Nopember: 79-92. Colbert, J.L. 1989. The Effect of Experience Auditor's Judgements.Journal of Accounting Literature. pp: 137-149.
Cooper, D.R. and P.S. Schindler. 2001. Business Research Methods. Seventh Edition. Boston: Mc. Graw-Hill International Edition.
Davis, K and N. John. 1985. Human Behavior at Work: Organizational Behaviour. Seventh Edition. Mc. Grow-Hill, Inc.
Lestari, E. dan D. Cahyono. 2003. Komitmen Organisasi dan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Mediasi Hubungan Dengan Intensi Keluar (Studi Empiris Pada Internal Auditor Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia). SNA VI. Surabaya 16-17 Oktober: 1092-1115.
Hadibroto, H.S. 1993. Peranan Fungsi Pengawasan Dalam Manajemen.Forum Komunikasi SPI. Medan: Bahan-Bahan Seminar: 7.
Hendriksen, E.S. dan M. Sinaga. 1996. Teori Akuntansi. Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Hoesodo, Soekardi. 2002. Sumber Konflik Auditor versus Auditan: Komunikasi Yang Tidak Pas. Auditor Internal. Jakarta. April – Juni: 30.
Holland, J.L. 1997. Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work
Environment.Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Ida Suraida. 2003. Pengaruh Etika, Kompetensi, Pengalaman, Risiko Audit dan Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Terhadap Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Akuntan Publik (Survai terhadap para akuntan publik di Indonesia). Disertasi. Bandung: Program Pascasarjana UNPAD (Tidak Dipublikasikan).
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia Kompartemen Akuntan Publik, Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik, per 1 Januari 2001, cetakan ke-1, PT. Salemba, Jakarta.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.1994. Dalam Hiro Tugiman. Tantangan dan Prospek Profesi Internal Auditor di Indonesia. Halaman 14. Jakarta: YPIA dan DS-QIA.
Kalbers, L.P. and T.J. Fogarty. 1995. Professional and Its Consequences: A Study Internal Auditor. A Journal Practice and Theory. Spring: 64-85.
Ketchen dan Strawser. 1998.dalam Yohannes Sri Guntur, Bambang Soepomo, & Gitoyo. 2002. Analisis Pengaruh Pengalaman Terhadap dan Analisis Pengaruh Terhadap Hasil Kerja (Outcomes). Jurnal MAKSI. Semarang: UNDIP. Vol 1:1-7.
Konrath, Laweey F. 2002. Auditing Concepts and Applications, A Risk-Analysis Approach. Fifth Edition. West Publising Company.
Kreitner, R. and A. Kinicki. 2001. Organizational Behaviour, Fifth Edition, The Mc Graw-Hill Companies, Inc,:155. Libby, R. and D. Frederik. 1990. Experience and The Ability to Explain Audit Findings. Journal of Accounting Research. Vol. 28, No. 2: 348-367.
Locke, E.A., 1976. The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction, dalam M.D. Dunnete.Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychologi, Chicago, Rand McNally.1319-28.
Riketta, M. 2002. Attitudinal Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior. March:257-66.
Robbins, Stephen P. 2005. Organizational Behavior.Eleventh Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
Samid, Suripto. 1996. Pengaruh Satuan Pengawasan Intern dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Serta Persepsi Bawahan Mengenai Perilaku Atasan Terhadap Upaya Manajemen Dalam Meningkatkan Profitabilitas Perusahaan. Disertasi. Bandung: Program Pascasarjana UNPAD (Tidak Dipublikasikan).
Tugiman, Hiro. 2000. Pengaruh Peran Auditor Internal Serta Faktor-Faktor Pendukungnya Terhadap
Peningkatan Pengendalian Internal dan Kinerja Perusahaan. Disertasi. Bandung: Program Pascasarjana UNPAD (Tidak Dipublikasikan).
_______. 2004a. Tantangan & Prospek Profesi Internal Auditor di Indonesia. Jakarta. 14 Februari:1-34.
_______. 2004b. Pengendalian Intern Organisasi Yang Buruk Penyebab Utama Indonesia Merupakan Salah Satu Negara Terkorup Di Dunia. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Dalam Ilmu Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Widyatama. Bandung. 11 Desember:1-22.
Vroom, V.H. 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley.
Wood, D.J., J.A. Wilson, and E.C. Holub. 1989. Professionalism in Internal Auditing. Altamonte Springs, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.
Yohannes S.G., B. Soepomo, dan Gitoyo. 2002. Analisis Pengaruh Pengalaman Terhadap dan Analisis Pengaruh Terhadap Hasil Kerja (Outcomes).Jurnal MAKSI. Semarang: UNDIP. Vol 1:1-7.
YPIA dan DS-QIA. 2003. Internal Audit Professional Training. Jakarta. Desember: 1-25.
The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga (JEBA) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
.png)
