The Influence of Full Day School Learning Methods on Student Motivation in Grade XI of SMA Negeri 1 Plemahan, Kediri with Emotional Intelligence as a Moderator Variable

Oky Urtya Dani*

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/adj.v3i2.18962
Abstract views = 109 times | downloads = 27 times

Abstract


In the teaching and learning process, motivation plays a huge role in learning achievement. Emotional Intelligence can also influence the learning achievement. The purpose of this research is to test and analyze the effect of full-day school learning methods on the learning motivation of class XI students of SMA Negeri 1 Plemahan, Kediri with emotional intelligence as a moderator variable. This research involved 160 respondents with quantitative approach methods. The data obtained will be analyzed using multiple linear analysis techniques. The result of this study indicates that there is an effect of full-day school learning methods on student motivation with a significance value of 0,000 <0.10. Furthermore, the multiple linear regression analysis with emotional intelligence as a moderator variable showed that the emotional intelligence variable succeeded in moderating the effect of full-day school learning methods on student motivation with a significance value of 0.005 <0.05.


Keywords


Emotional Intelligence, Full Day School, Learning Motivation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ary, D., Jacobs, L., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. USA: Wadsworth

Brown, H. D. (2003). Language Assesment Principles and Classroom Practice. In Pearson Longman.

Carmody, Kevin, & Zane, B. (2005). Elemental Analysis of the Online Learning Experience. International Journal of

Education AND Development Using ICT, Vol. 1 No.3.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. California: Sage Publication.

Faraway, J. J. (2002). Practical Regression and Anova using R. Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-

(91)90006-D

Gay, L., & Diehl, P. (1992). Reserach Methods for Business and Management. New York: Macmillan Publishing company.

Goleman, D. (1996). Emotional Intelligence: Why Can It Matter More Than IQ for Character, Helath, and Lifelong

Achievement? In BantamBooks.

Juliandi, A., & Irfan. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Untuk ilmu-Ilmu Bisnis. Bandung: Citapustaka Media

Perintis.

Miller. (2005). Full-Day or Half-Day Elementary. (htpp: //www.askeric.org): (Online), accessed on January 22, 2018. Ministry of Education and Culture. (2019). KEMENDIKBUD Data Statistics Publication. on January 6, 2018. At 20:15 WIB:

http://publikasi.data.kemdikbud.go.id/uploadDir/isi_B5497FED-88A5-47CD-9492-78B703B41D28.pdf.

Mubeen, & Reid. (2006). The Measurement of Motivation With Science Students. 129-144. Riduan, & Akdon. (2010). Rumus dan Data Dalam Analisis Data Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sardiman, A. (2010). Interaction and Teaching and Learning Motivation. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Silalahi. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Slameto (2010). Learning and Factors That Influence It. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Suryosubroto. (2009). Teaching and Learning Process in School. Jakarta: Rineke Cipta.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
ADJ by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.