MITIGATION OF PROFIT MANIPULATION OF REAL ACTIVITIES WITH EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNAL GOVERNANCE STUDY ON PUBLIC COMPANIES IN INDONESIA
Downloads
This study aims to examine the effectiveness of internal governance to mitigate real activity earnings manipulation. Real activity profit manipulation as the dependent variable is measured in three proxies, namely sales activity manipulation (Abnormal CFO), production cost manipulation (Abnormal Production), and discretionary cost manipulation (Abnormal Discreationer) based on Roychowdhury, 2006). While the independent variable is internal governance, which is still relatively little researched but in several studies it has been shown to reduce real earnings management, this study measures internal governance based on Chen et al., (2016). This study also examines other variables as moderating variables, namely the control of an independent board of commissioners and institutional ownership which are thought to strengthen the effectiveness of internal governance in mitigating earnings manipulation. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression. This study succeeded in providing evidence that internal governance is able to mitigate earnings manipulation by managers. In addition, this study also provides support that institutional ownership and independent board of commissioners can moderate the influence between internal governance and real earnings management. The results of this study can add references to real earnings management mitigation and also as one of the considerations for long-term investment decisions in the capital market for investors.
Acharya, V., Myers. S., dan Rajan. R. 2011. The internal governance of ï¬rms. Journal of Finance, Vol. 66, No.1, Hal. 689–720.
Adiasih, Priskila dan Indra. 2011. Manajemen Laba Pada Saat Pergantian CEO (Dirut) Di Indonesia. Universitas Gadjah Mada: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan.Vol. 13.No. 2, Hal: 67-79
Adams, R., Almeida, H., dan D. Ferreira. 2005. Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance, Review of Financial Studies, Vol.18, No.4, Hal. 1403–1432.
Allen, F., dan Gale.D. 2000. Comparing Financial Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Amstrong, C., Larcker, D., Ormazabal. G., dan Taylor. D. 2013. The relation between equity incentives and misreporting: The role of risk-taking incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.109, No.1, Hal. 327–350.
Bartov, E., Givoly. D., dan Hayn.C. 2002. The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.33, No.2, Hal.173–204.
Bhojraj, S., Hribar. P., Picconi. M., dan McInnis. J. 2009. Making sense of cents: An examination of ï¬rms that marginally miss or beat analyst forecasts. Journal of Finance. Vol. 64, No.5, Hal. 2361–2388.
Bushee, B. J. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review 73: 305–333.
Chen, X., Harford. J., dan Li. K. 2007. Monitoring: Which institutions matter?. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 86, No.1, Hal. 279–305.
Chen, X., Cheng. Q., Lo. A., dan Wang. X. 2015. CEO contractual protection and managerial short-termism. The Accounting Review, Vol.90, No.5, Hal. 1871–1906.
Cheng. Q., Lee. J., dan Shevlin. T. 2016. Internal Governance and Real Earnings Management .The Accounting Review. Vol.91, No.4. Hal. 1051–1085.
Cohen, D., dan Zarowin, P. 2010. Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol.50 No. 1, Hal. 2–19.
Cremers, M., dan Grinstein, Y. 2011. Does the Market for CEO Talent Explain Controversial CEO Pay Practices?. Working paper, Yale University and Cornell University.
DeFond, M., dan Park.W. 1997. Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.23, No.1, Hal.115–139.
Dichev, I., Graham. J., Harvey. G., dan Rajgopal. S. 2013. Earnings quality: Evidence from the ï¬eld. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 56, No.5, Hal.1–33.
Dyck, A., A. Morse, and L. Zingales. 2013. How Pervasive is Corporate Fraud? Working paper, University of Toronto and The University of Chicago.
Effendi, Muh. Arief. 2016. The Power Of Corporate Governance: Teori dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Fama, E. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the ï¬rm. Journal of Political Economy , Vol.88, No. 2, Hal.288–307.
Feng, M., Ge. W., Luo.S., dan Shevlin. T. 2011. Why do CFOs become involved in material accounting manipulations?. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.51, Hal. 21–36.
Finkelstein, S. 1992. Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, Vol.35, No.3, Hal. 505–538.
Ghozali, I. 2009. Aplikasi Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Graham, J. R., Harvey. C.R., dan Puri. M. 2013. Capital Allocation and Delegation of Decision-Making Authority within Firms. Working paper, Duke University.
Gumilang, Fidya.A., Suhadak., Magesti, Sri. 2015. Pengaruh kepemilikan institusional dan asimetri informasi terhadap manajemen laba. Jurnal Administrasi dan Bisnis (JAB). Vol. 23 No. 1, Hal. 1-7.
Jaggi, B., Leung.S., dan Gul.F. 2009. Family Control, Board Independence and Earnings Management: Evidence Based on Hong Kong Firms. Journal Account Public Policy. Vol. 28, No.3. Hal. 281–300.
Kasznik, R., dan McNichols. M.F. 2002. Does meeting earnings expectations matter? Evidence from analyst forecast revisions and share prices. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.40, No.3, Hal.727–759.
Landier. A., Sraer. D., dan Thesmar. D. 2009. Optimal dissent in organizations. Review of Economic Studies, Vol.76., Hal. 761–794.
Matsunaga, S. R., dan Park. C. K. 2001. The effect of missing a quarterly earnings benchmark on the CEO's annual bonus. The Accounting Review, Vol. 76, No.3, Hal.313–332.
Roychowdhury. S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.42, Hal.335–370.
Schipper, K. 1989. Commentary: Earnings management. Accounting Horizons , Vol.3, No.4, Hal.91–102.
Weisbach, M. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol.20. Hal. 431–460.
Young, W.O., Kyun. Y.C., dan Aleksey. M. 2011. The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 104, No.3, Hal.283-297.
Authors who publish with Berkala Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia agree to the following terms:
The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY NC SA)
BAKI (Berkala Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.