CAN TAX SANCTIONS AND TAX AMNESTY MITIGATE TAX NON-COMPLIANCE?: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE IN INDONESIA
Downloads
This study examines the tax sanctions policy and the tax amnesty program on the compliance of individual taxpayers who conduct business activities. Based on experimental data with a 2x2 factorial design between subjects, participants who are given high tax sanctions tend to be more obedient than participants who are given low tax sanctions manipulation, as well as with the tax amnesty program, participants tend to be more obedient than if there is no program. tax amnesty. Finally, the interaction results also show significant results but interestingly in a direction that is not in accordance with the hypothesis. It was found that tax compliance can be achieved more effectively when the tax amnesty program is combined with lower tax penalties. This implies that a motivational approach in the form of incentives will be more effective when combined with a motivational approach in the form of low-level threats (low enforcement). This study contributes to the tax compliance literature, especially with the specific topic of tax amnesty.
Alabede, J. O., Arifin, Z. B. Z., & Idris, K. M. (2011). The Moderating Effect of Financial Condition on the Factors Influencing Taxpayer's Compliance Behaviour in Nigeria. Journal Finance And Management In Public Service, 1(2), 42-53.
Ali, M. M., Cecil, H. W., & Knoblett, J. A. (2001). The Effects Of Tax Rates And Enforcement Policies On Taxpayer Compliance: A Study Of Self-Employed Taxpayers. Antlantic Economic Journal 29(2), 186-202.
Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion : A Theoretical Analysis. Journal Of Public Economics, 1, 323-338.
Alm, J. (1998). Tax Policy Analysis : The Introduction Of A Russian Tax Amnesty. Working Paper 98-6.
Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., & Mckee, M. (1992). Estimating The Determinants Of Taxpayer Compliance With Experimental Data. National Tax Journal, 45(107-114).
Alm, J., McKee, M., & Beck, W. (1990). Amazing Grace : Tax Amnesties And Compliance. National Tax Journal, 43(1), 23-37.
Ardani, M. N. (2010). Pengaruh Kebijakan Sunset Policy Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak (Studi Kasus Di Kanwil Direktorat Jendral Pajak Jawa Timur I Surabaya). (Magister Ilmu Hukum), Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
Arum, H. P. (2012). Pengaruh Kesadaran Wajib Pajak, Pelayanan Fiskus, Dan Sanksi Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Yang Melakukan Kegiatan Usaha Dan Pekerjaan Bebas (Studi di Wilayah KPP Pratama Cilacap). (S1), Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Bobek, D. D., & Hageman, A. M. (2013). Analyzing The Role Of Social Norms In Tax Compliance Behavior J. Bus Ethics.
Bobek, D. D., & Hatfield, R. C. (2003). An Investigation of the Theory Planned Behavior and the Role of Moral Obligation in Tax Compliance. Behavioral Research In Accounting, 15, 13-38.
Boylan, S. J. (2010). Prior Audits and Taxpayer Compliance: Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Earned Versus Endowed Income. Journal Of The American Taxation Association, 32(1), 73-78.
Cahyonowati, N., Ratmono, D., & Faisal. (2012). Peranan Etika, Pemeriksaan, Dan Denda Pajak Untuk Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Wajib PajakOrang Pribadi. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 9(2), 136-153.
Davoodi, H., & Zou, H. F. (1998). Fiscal Decentralization And Economic Growth : A Cross-Country Study. Journal Of Urban Economics, 43, 244-257.
Devano, S., & Rahayu, S. K. (2006). Perpajakan : Konsep, Teori, Dan Isu Jakarta: Kencana.
Eshag, E. (1983). Fiscal And Monetary Policies And Problem In Developing Countries Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ghosh, D., & Crain, T. L. (1996). Experimental Investigation Of Ethical Standard And Perceived Probability Of Audit On Intentional Noncompliance. Behavioral Research In Accounting, 8.
Hammar, H., Jagers, S. C., & Nordblom, K. (2005). Tax Evasion And The Importance Of Trust. Working Paper In Economics No. 179.
Hantoyo, S. S., Kertahadi, & Handayani, S. R. (2016). Pengaruh Penghindaran Pajak Dan Sanksi Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak (Studi pada Wajib Pajak di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Tegal). Jurnal Perpajakan, 9(1).
Harmenita, R., Musadieq, M. A., & Ruhana, I. (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Fiskus Terhadap Reinventing Policy Dan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Jurnal Perpajakan, Vol 9(1).
Hutagaol, J., Winarko, W. W., & Pradipta, A. (2007). Strategi Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Akuntabilitas, 6(2), 186-193.
Indrajaya, B. (2015). Antara Sunset Policy Dan Reinventing Policy. Indonesia Tax review.
Iqbal, M. (2015). Pajak Sebagai Ujung Tombak Pembangunan Retrieved 23 April, 2016, from http://www.pajak.go.id/content/article/pajak-sebagai-ujung-tombak-pembangunan
James, S., & Alley, C. (2002). Tax Compliance Self Assessment And Tax Administration. Journal Finance And Management In Public Service, 2(2), 27-42.
Kusuma, H., & Rizkiana, V. (2012). Model Kemauan Membayar Pajak Bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi (Studi Kasus Pada Wajib PajakKantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Sleman). Jurnal Studi Ekonomi, 3(2), 95-106.
Lederman, L. (2003). The Interplay Between Norms and Enforcement In Tax Compliance. Ohio State Law Journal, 64(6), 1453-1514.
Mardiasmo. (2009). Perpajakan Edisi Revisi 2009. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Maseko, N. (2014). Determinants Of Tax Compliance By Small And Medium Enterprise In Zimbabwe. Journal Of Economics And International Bussiness Research, 2(3), 48-57.
Meliala, T. (2007). Perpajakan dan Akuntansi Pajak. Bandung: Grahatipa.
Mughal, M. M., & Akram, M. (2012). Reason Of Tax Avoidance And Tax Evasion : Reflection From Pakistan. Journal Of Economics And Behavioral Studies 4(4), 217-222.
Mukarromah, A., Aeny, S. N., & Megawati, R. (2016). Pentingnya Peran Tax Amnesty di 2016. Inside Tax, 37, 7-12.
Muliari, N. K., & Setiawan, P. E. (2011). Pengaruh Persepsi Tentang Sanksi Perpajakan Dan Kesadaran Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Denpasar Timur. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 6.
Mustikasari, E. (2007). Kajian Empiris Tentang Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Badan Di Perusahaan Industri Pengolahan Di Surabaya. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X.
Narsa, N. P. D. R. H., & Prananjaya, K. P. (2017). Hubungan Faktor Internal dan Eksternal terhadap Proses Pengambilan Keputusan Etis. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi, 18(1), 80-101.
Ngadiman, & Huslin, D. (2015). Pengaruh Sunset Policy, Tax Amnesty, Dan Sanksi Pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi, Volume XIX, 225-241.
Nurmantu, S. (2003). Pengantar Perpajakan. Jakarta: Granit.
Pranata, P. A., & Setiawan, P. E. (2015). Pengaruh Sanksi Perpajakan, Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Kewajiban Moral Pada Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 10(2), 456-473.
Prasetyo, K. A. (2015). Sunset Policy (Lagi) : Perlukah? Inside Tax, 31.
Rahayu, S. K. (2010). Perpajakan Indonesia Konsep dan Aspek Formal Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Ratung, T. V., & Adi, P. H. (2009). Dampak Program Sunset Policy Terhadap Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kemauan Membayar Pajak Simposium Nasional Perpajakan II.
Reskino, Rini, & Novitasari, D. (2014). Persepsi Mahasiswa Akuntansi Mengenai Penggelapan Pajak. Jurnal InFestasi, 10(1), 49-63.
Salip, & Wato, T. (2006). Pengaruh Pemeriksaan Pajak Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak (Studi Kasus di KPP kebun Jeruk Jakarta). Jurnal Keuangan Publik, 4(2), 61-68.
Santoso, W. (2008). Analisis Risiko Ketidakpatuhan Wajib Pajak Sebagai Dasar Peningkatan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak (Penelitian Terhadap Wajib Pajak Badan Di Indonesia). Jurnal Keuangan Publik, 5(1), 85-137.
Simanjuntak, T. H. (2009). Kepatuhan Pajak (Tax Compliance) Dan Bagi Hasil Pajak Dalam Perekonomian Di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 1(2).
Soemitro, R. (1992). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pajak dan Pajak Pendapatan 1994. Bandung: Eresco.
Spalek, J. (2015). Factors Influencing Compliance Behavior In Tax Laboratory Experiment. Conference Paper.
Suminarsasi, W., & Supriyadi. (2012). Pengaruh Keadilan, Sistem Perpajakan, dan Diskriminasi Terhadap Persepsi Wajib Pajak Mengenai Etika Penggelapan Pajak. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 15.
Tobing, G. C., Farman, G., & Khairani, D. (2015). Pahami Dan Manfaat Reinventing Policy. InsideTAX, 5-10.
Waluyo, & Ilyas, W. B. (2010). Perpajakan Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Authors who publish with Berkala Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia agree to the following terms:
The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY NC SA)
BAKI (Berkala Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
