The Effectiveness of 2.5% NaOCl Irrigation and 17% EDTA against the Sealing Ability of Resin Paste
Downloads
Background: Root canal irrigation seeks the elimination of bacteria and its products from the root canal. If debris is left in the root canal, it can prohibit adaptation between obturationmaterial and root canal wall. Therefore, it can decrease the sealing ability of obturation material. Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA on the apical sealing ability of resin obturation paste. Method: The roots of 18 human mandibular premolar teeth were selected and the root canal was prepared using a conventional technique. Samples were irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl, and17% EDTA, and sterile aquadest (Aqua Deastilata) as a control group. Samples were filled with gutta-percha and top seal. Samples were soaked in 2% methylene blue for 48 hours to measure the depth of microleakage. Result: The mean apical leakage after irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl; 17% EDTA; and sterile aquadest in the sequence were 0.92 mm; 3.6 mm; and 8.08 mm. Conclusion: 2.5% NaOClhas less depth of microleakage than 17% EDTA. However, the depth of microleakage cannot demonstrate the exact sealing ability of the resin paste due to some factors.
Hargreaves KM, Cohen S. 2011. Cohen's Pathway of the Pulp 10th Edition. Missouri: Mosby Elsevierp284-383
Gupta H, Kandaswamy D, Manchanda SK, Shourie S. 2013. Evaluation of the sealing ability of two sealers after using chlorhexidine as a final irrigant: An in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry : JCD, 16(1):75-8
Zand V, Mokhtari H, Lotfi M, Rahimi S, Sohrabi A, Zadeh SB, Kahnamooie HM, Tehranchi P. 2014. A SEM Study on the Effect of an Experimental Irrigation Solution onSmear Layer Removal. I ranian Endodontic Journal, 87(4):131-136
Lopes HP, De Faria AR, Alves FRF, Elias CN. 2015. Wettability of Irrigants used in Root Canal Treatment. Dentistry: an open access journal, 5(3):283-5.
Kovac J, Kovac D. 2011. Effect of Irrigating Solutions in Endodontic Therapy. Bratisi Lek Listy, 112(7):410-5.
Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N. 2010. Root canal irrigants. Journal of Conservative Dentistry : JCD, 34(3):256-64.
Tanumihardja M. 2010. Larutan irigasi saluran akar. Jurnal kedokteran gigi dentofasial, 9(2): 25 –9.
Al-Aubaydi AFM, Aziz A. 2010. Effect of EDTA on apical leakage of resin based root canal sealer. J Bagh Coll Dentistry, 22(4): 10-3.
YilmazZ, Basbag B, Buzoglu HD, Gümüsderelioglu M. 2011. Effect of low- surface-tension EDTA solutions on the wettability of root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 111:109-114.
Guttman JL, Kuttler S, Niemczyk SP. 2010. Root CanalObturation: An Update. Academy of General Dentistry, 20(1):1-11.
Saraf-Dadpe A, Kamra AI. 2012. A SEM evaluation of the penetration of root canal dentinal tubules by four different endodontic sealers: An in vitro study. Journal of International Oral Health, 6(3):89-96
Bidar M, Sadehalhoseini N, Forghani M, Attaran N. 2014. Effect of the smear layer on apical seals produced by two calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers. Journal of Oral Science, 56(3):215-9
Shi S, Zhang D-D, Chen X, Bao Z-F, GuoY-
J. Apical Sealing Ability of BioceramicPaste andMineral TrioxideAggregate Retrofillings: A Dye Leakage Study. Iranian Enddontic Journal, 12(2):99-103.
Ulusoy OI, Nayir Y, Celik K, Yaman SD. 2013. Apical microleakage of differentroot.
CDJ by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions