ETNOLINGUAL

KAJIAN ETNOLINGUISTIK PADA KULINER KHAS KABUPATEN GRESIK SEBAGAI REPRESENTASI IDENTITAS BUDAYA LOKAL

Iklilah Atikoh — 2025-05-21

Abstract: : This study aims to explore the relationship between language, culture, and local identity through the ethnolinguistic analysis of traditional Gresik cuisine. A total of 14 culinary names were documented, including Sego Krawu, Pudak, Mangut Bandeng, and Otak-Otak Bandeng, which serve as a medium for communicating cultural values passed down through generations. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with local residents, direct observations, and literature reviews, and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive method. The findings reveal that the names of traditional Gresik dishes reflect the region's historical significance as a port city, its social and cultural traditions, and its close connection with the geographic environment. For instance, the term “Pudak” illustrates the community's creativity in utilizing natural materials such as areca palm leaves as wrappers, while “Sego Krawu” symbolizes the simplicity and togetherness of the people. Additionally, the influence of the historical spice trade is evident in cooking techniques such as salting and the use of rich spices in dishes like Mangut Bandeng. Culinary names also serve as markers of cultural identity, strengthening the community's sense of belonging. In the context of globalization, these names symbolize resistance to culturalhomogenization. Through food festivals, they play a role in cultural diplomacy, introducing Gresik's unique heritage to the broader world. This documentation aims to preserve culinary traditions as intangible cultural heritage and provides a reference for future linguistic and anthropological studies.

Keywords: ethnolinguistics, traditional Gresik cuisine, cultural preservation.

ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS PADA TAGAR “PERINGATAN DARURAT” DI MEDIA SOSIAL X

Solikhah Anita Rahmawatim — 2025-05-21

Abstract: The hashtag "peringatan darurat" contains posts urging the public to monitor government decisions. This study aims to reveal the use and influence of language in the "peringatan darurat" hashtag on the social media platform X. The research employs a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The data sources consist of tweet texts from posts tagged with "peringatan darurat" on social media X. To collect data, the methods used in this study include observation and documentation. The research analyzes microstructure, superstructure, and macrostructure using the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) model by Teun A. van Dijk. The microstructure is divided into semantics, syntax, and stylistics. The semantic elements reveal the use of denotative, connotative, rhetorical, and informal diction. The syntactic elements include declarative, imperative, and persuasive sentence forms. The stylistic elements highlight informative, satirical, and ironic language styles that enhance the discourse’s meaning. The superstructure identifies schematic elements, comprising an introduction, body, and conclusion. The macrostructure uncovers thematic elements that illustrate social criticism, collective solidarity, and public participation. The dimension of power reflects resistance to government policies through critical language, while the ideological dimension emphasizes the values of democracy and social justice underlying public opinion. This study concludes that the discourse within the "peringatan darurat" hashtag is strategically constructed in accordance with the ideological interests of the actors involved. The account @antikorupsi exerts pressure on the government through factual arguments, @walhinasional highlights environmental exploitation using metaphors, @aingriwehuy conveys public concerns through satire, and @Penyair_Berdiri generates social pressure through emotional rhetoric.

Keywords: Critical Discourse, Peringatan Darurat Hashtag, X Social Media

SEMANTIC CHANGES IN ENGLISH BASIC COLOR TERMS: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE VICTORIAN AND CONTEMPORARY ERAS

Dara Mela Ayu — 2025-05-21

Abstract: : This study utilizes the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) to investigate the semantic changes in English basic color terms by comparing their usage in the Victorian Era (1840s–1890s) and the Contemporary Era (1950s–2010s). The research focuses on how these terms have evolved in meaning and association, as reflected in frequency trends and collocational patterns. Frequency analysis reveals an expansion in color terminology over time, mostly aligning with Berlin and Kay’s basic color theory. This growth, particularly in less common color terms, suggests that modern cultural and societal factors might influence their development. Collocational analysis shows shifts in tone and usage, with red, green, and blue acquiring more positive associations (amelioration), while white, yellow, and grey show increasingly negative connotations (pejoration). Additionally, terms like purple, pink, and orange display broadened meanings, whereas black and brown have narrowed in their associations. The findings highlight a transition from natural and aesthetic contexts in the Victorian Era to more practical and commercial applications in contemporary use. This study offers valuable insights into the processes of semantic change and the broader significance of color terminology in English.

Keywords: semantic change, color terms, diachronic corpus

REPRESENTATION OF SHOOTING IN CNN: A CORPUS-BASED CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Aura Hilda Haryono — 2025-05-21

Abstract: Nowadays, mass shootings have become a major problem in the United States. The media, especially CNN, plays an important role in shaping ideologies and perceptions of this case. This study aims to analyze CNN's role in representing shooting incidents in the United States from October to November 2023. This research applied a descriptive qualitative method, focusing on corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis using Fairclough’s (2013) theory. The results found that the collocation and concordance of the word “Shooting” are often associated with verbs and adjectives with negative connotations. Discourse practice analysis indicates CNN’s tendency as a “left-wing” media. Furthermore, socio-cultural practice analysis shows that the shooting incident is related to the international political situation and poor government response. In addition, social factors reflect the ideology, culture, politics, and economic aspects of this shooting case. Thus, CNN’s ideology aligns with the left-wing groups, or liberals, in reporting mass shooting cases in the United States.

Keywords: Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Corpus, Shooting, CNN

TINDAK EKSPRESIF MEMUJI KOMENTAR JURI INDONESIAN IDOL SEASON 12 DAN AMERICAN IDOL SEASON 6

Kamilia Tsuraya — 2025-05-21

Abstract: This research aims to pragmatically analyze the comparison of judges' comments on Indonesian Idol Season 12 and American Idol Season 6, with a focus on the politeness strategies and expressive speech acts of praise used. These two seasons were chosen because they have the highest rating shares in Indonesia and the United States respectively. The research method used involves collecting data through observing videos from YouTube. The videos were transcribed for analysis using the expressive speech act theory of praise. In the analysis, researchers identified the form, frequency, and differences in the use of expressive speech acts of praise that reflect their respective cultural backgrounds. The results showed that there was a striking difference in the frequency of expressive speech acts of praise between the two events. On Indonesian Idol, 15 expressive speech acts of praise were found in the judges' comments, while on American Idol, only 9 similar speech acts were found. This difference indicates that the culture of the target audience of the program can influence the dominance and speech act patterns that emerge. In other words, expressions of politeness and praise in the judges' comments are more common in Indonesian Idol, which may reflect Indonesian cultural norms which tend to be more collective and oriented towards social harmony compared to American culture which is more individualistic. This research provides insight into the relationship between communication strategies in television programs and the cultural context of society, as well as the importance of understanding cross-cultural pragmatics.

Keywords: American Idol, Indonesian Idol, Expressive Speech Act of Praise

ETIKA BERBAHASA DALAM MELAKUKAN LIVE STREAMING YOUTUBE

Adji Amadio Janitra Ramadhan — 2025-05-21

Abstract: The ethics of language usage in YouTube live streaming has become an increasingly important topic as the platform grows in popularity as a medium for communication and entertainment. Live streaming facilitates direct interaction between content creators and viewers, often leading to uncontrolled language use by streamers. Ethical issues in language usage in this context can have negative impacts, such as the spread of hate speech and the creation of an unhealthy communication environment. Therefore, this paper aims to: (1) examine the language used by streamers MiawAug and Windah Basudara during YouTube live streams, (2) assess the impact of their language usage during live streaming, and (3) provide suggestions or recommendations for gaming streamers on YouTube.This study employs a qualitative research approach. Data collection techniques include indirect interviews conducted through Google Forms. The research subjects are active students from UPN Veteran Jawa Timur who are viewers of MiawAug and Windah Basudara’s YouTube live streams. The study period spans from August to October 2024.The results of the study reveal the following Language usage Windah Basudara often uses less polite expressions, such as "Anjir di kombo anjir muncul tiba-tiba cok" (used during surprising moments in games), while MiawAug tends to use more polite phrases like "Happy new year! Thank you everyone, happy new year!" (used during moments of victory). Impact of language usage: The positive impact of language usage by MiawAug and Windah Basudara during live streaming includes fostering a healthy and supportive community on YouTube. However, the negative impact includes potential harm to the community and a diminished viewing experience for audiences.Recommendations for gaming Streamers are encouraged to use proper and appropriate language to build a healthy community on YouTube.

Keywords: Language Ethics, live streaming YouTube, MiawAug, Windah Basudar