3D Printing Geometric Scaffold Design Variation of Injectable Bone Substitutes (IBS) Pa
Downloads
3D printing technology application in tissue engineering could be provided by designing geometrical scaffold architecture which also functionates as drug delivery. For drug delivery scaffold on bone tuberculosis, the cell pore of the geometric design was filled with Injectable Bone Substitutes (IBS) which had streptomycin as anti-tuberculosis. In this study, scaffolds were synthesized in three cells geometric filled by Injectable Bone Substitutes (IBS), Hexahedron, Truccated Hexahedron, and Rhombicuboctahedron, which had 2.5 mm x 2.5 mm x 2.5 mm size dimension and 0.8 mm strut. The final design was printed in 3D with polylactic acid (PLA) filament using the FDM process (Fused Deposition Modelling). The composition of IBS paste was a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and gelatine (GEL) 20% w/v with a ratio of 60:40, streptomycin 10 wt% and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) 4% w/v. It was then characterized using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Scaffold–paste characterization was included pore size test of 3D printing result before and after injected using Scanning Electron Microscope SEM, porosity test, and compressive strength test. The result showed that the pore of scaffold design was 1379 µm and after injected with IBS paste, the pore leaving 231.04 µm of size. The scaffold with IBS paste porosity test showed ranges between 40,78-70,04% while the compressive strength of before and after injected ranges between 1,110-634 MPa and 2,217-6,971 MPa respectively. From the test results, the scaffold 3D printing with IBS paste in this study had suitable physical characteristics to be applicated on cancellous bones which were infected by tuberculosis.
Al'Aref, J Subhi. 2018. 3D Printing Applications in Cardiovascular Medicine. London : Elsevier Inc.
Jia An, Joanne Ee Mei Teoh, Chee Kai Chua. 2015. Design and 3D Printing of Scaffolds and Tissues Engineering.
Tan, Yu.. 2014. 3D Printing Facilitated Scaffold-free Tissue Unit Fabrication.1:1-16.
Chia Helena N dan Wu Benjamin M.. 2015. Recent advantaces in 3D printing of Biomaterials.9:1-4.
Itoh M, Nakayama K, Nokuguchi R and Furukawa K. 2015. Scaffold-Free Tubular Tissue Created by a Bio-3D Printer Undergo Remodelling and Endothelialization when Implanted in Rat Aortae
Q.L.Loh, C. Choong, Three-dimensional Scaffold for Tissues Engineering Applications: Role of porosity and pore size. Tissues Engineering Part B Review, 2013, 19(6)485-502.
Singh Deepti dan Singh Dolly. 2016. 3D Printing of Scaffold for Cells Delivery Advences in Skin Tissue Engineering. 8:1-19.
H. N.Maulida, D. Hikmawati, and A. S. Budiatin, "Injectable Bone Substitute Paste Based on Hydroxyapatite, Gelatin and Streptomycin for Spinal Tuberculosis,” J. Spine, 4, pp. 4–7, 2015.
Ren, Jie. 2010. Synthesis, Modification, Processing and Applications. Shanghai: Tsinghua University Press.
Kokubo T dan Takadama H.. 2006. How Useful is SBF in Predicting in Vivo Bone Bioactivity. 15:2907-15
Barralet JE, Gaunt T, Wright AJ, Gibson IR, Knowles JC. 2002. Effect of Porosity Reduction by Compaction on Compressive Strength and Microstucture of Calcium Phosphate Cement. 63:1-9.
Ficai, A., Andrnescu, E., Voicu, G., Ficai, D. 2011. Advances in Collagen/Hidroxyapatite Composite Material. In Tech.
Mosekilde, Lis. And Mosekilde, Leif. 1989. Sex Different in age-related changes in vertebral body size, density and biomechanical competence in normal individuals. 11:67-73.
