PENGARUH CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION DAN SELFEFFICACY TERHADAP ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION DAN ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
Downloads
Introduction: This study aims to examine the effect of corporate
entrepreneurial intentions consisting of innovation, risk taking, and
proactiveness on entrepreneurial intentions and organizational
performance, with self-efficacy as a variable that moderates the
influence between corporate entrepreneurial intentions and
entrepreneurial intentions in Citraland Surabaya.
Methods: This study uses quantitative methods and the samples used
are employees from various departments at Citraland Surabaya. The
instrument used in this study was a questionnaire, then tested the
relationship between variables with partial least squares, using the
SmartPLS software.
Results: The results of this study indicate that there is a positive and
insignificant effect of innovation on entrepreneurial intentions, a
negative and insignificant effect of risk taking on entrepreneurial
intentions, and a non-significant positive effect on entrepreneurial
intentions. This study also found that the overall variables of corporate
entrepreneurial intention had a positive and insignificant effect on
organizational performance. The moderator variable in the form of selfefficacy was found to be unable to moderate the effect of the company's
entrepreneurial intentions on entrepreneurial intentions.
Conclusion and suggestion: The company can also facilitate the
entrepreneurial interest of these employees by giving them higher
authority when the company establishes new branches. It is hoped that
the company will realize the importance of fostering interest in the
company, and how this will provide them with future retirement.
Antoncic, B., Robert D. Hisrich. 2001. Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and Cross-Cultural Validation. Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 16: 495-527
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2013. Berita Resmi Statistik. No. 35/05/Th. XVI
Bhuian, S. N, O. C. Richard., . H. M. Shamma. 2010. Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizational Performance: The Role of Managerial Traits. Competition Forum. Vol. 8(1): 81-85
Bird, B. 1988. Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 13(3): 442-453
Bolton, D. L., Michelle D. Lane. 2012. Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation: Development of a Measurement Instrument. Education and Training. Vol. 54 (2): 219 - 233
Boyd, N. G., G. S. Vozikis. 1994. The Influence of Self-Efficacy on the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Bosscher, R. J. H. Smit. 1998. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy. Vol. 36: 339-343
Brockhaus, R.H. 1980. Risk Taking Propensity of Entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 23(3): 509-520
Burgelman, R.A. 1983. Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of Competitive Advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol. 23(3): 85-102
Campos, H. M., J. P. N. de la Parra, F. S. Parellada. 2012. The Entrepreneurial Orientation-Dominant Logic-performance relationship in new ventures: an exploratory quantitative study. Brazilian Admisitration Review. Vol. 9: 60-77
Chow, I. H. 2006. The Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance in China. S. A. M. Advanced Management Journal. Vol. 71(3): 11-21
Ciputra, A. Tanan, A. Waluyo. 2011. Ciputra Quantum Leap 2: Kenapa dan Bagaimana Entrepreneurship mengubah masa depan Bangsa dan masa depan Anda. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo
Crant, J.M. 1996. The Proactive Personality Scale as a Predictor of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Small Business Management. Vol. 34(3): 42-49
Darwanto. 2012. Peran Entrepreneurship Dalam Mendorong Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Universitas Diponegoro
Felicio, J.A., R. Rodrigues, V. R. Caldeirinha. 2012. The effect of intrapreneurship on corporate performance. Management Decision. Vol. 50(10): 1717-1738
Ferreira, J. J., et al. 2012. A model of entrepreneurial intention: An application of the psychological and behavioral approaches. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol. 19(3): 424-440
Fini, R., et al. 2010. The Determinant of Corporate Entreprenurial Intention Within Small and Newly Established Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practices
Frazier, P. A., K. E. Baron, A. P. Tix. 2004. Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research. Vol. 51(1): 115-134
Guth, W. D., A. Ginsberg. 1990. ‘Guest Editors' Introduction: Corporate Entrepreneurship. Stratregic Management Journal. Vol. 11(4): 5-15
Hmieleski, K. M., R. A. Baron. 2008. When does Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy Enhance versus Reduce Firm Performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. Vol. 2: 57-72
Kaya, N. 2006. The impact of human resource management practices and corporate entrepreneurship on firm performance: evidence from Turkish firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 17(12): 2074-2090
Koh, H.C. 1996. Testing Hypoteses of Entrepreneurial Characteristic: A study of Hong Kong MBA Students. Journal of Managerial Psychology. Vol. 11(3): 12-23
Krueger Jr., N.F. D. V. Brazeal. 1994. Entrepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol. 18(3): 91-104
Lee, L. P, K. Wong, M. D. Foo, A. Leung. 2011. Entrepreneurial intentions: The influence of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 26: 124-136
Lumpkin, G. T., G. G. Dess. 1996. Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 21(1): 135-172
Macko A., T. Tyszka. 2009. Entrepreneurship and Risk Taking. Applied Psychology: An International Review. Vol. 58(3): 469-487
Malhotra, N. K., J. Agarwal, M. Peterson. 1996. Methodological issues in cross-cultural marketing research: A state-of-the-art review. International Marketing Review. Vol. 13 (5): 7 - 43
McMullen, J. S., D. A. Shepherd. Entrepreneurial Action and The Role of Uncertainty in the Theory of Entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 31(1): 132-152
Mustafa, H. 2000. Teknik Sampling. Bandung: Alfabeta
Naldi, L., et al. 2007. Entrepreneurial Orientation, Risk Taking, and Performance in Family Firms. Family Business Review. Vol. 20(1): 33-47
Poon, J. M. L., Raja Azimah Ainuddin, Sa'Odah Haji Junit. 2006. Effects of Self-Concept Traits and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Firm Performance. International Small Business Journal. Vol. 24(1): 61-82
Powell, M., D. Ansic. Gender differences Ni risk behaviour in Financial decision-making: An eksperimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology. Vol. 18: 605-628
Rauch, A., et al. 2009. Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of Past Research and Suggestions for the Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol. 33(3): 761-787
Richard, P.J., et al. 2009. Measuring Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable: Towards Methodological Best Practice. Journal of Management. Vol. 35(3): 718-804
Saly, A.W. 2001. Corporate Entrepreneurship. Tinbergen Institute Research Series. Erasmus University of Rotterdam
Sharma, P. J. J. Chrisman. 1999. Towards a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. Vol. 23(3): 11-270
Souitaris, V., S. Zerbinati. A. Al-Laham. 2007. Do entrepreneurship programme raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, insipiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 22: 566-591
Tsang, K. K. 2012. The use of midpoint on Likert Scale: The implication for educational research. Hong Kong Teachers' Centre Journal. Vol. 11: 121-130
Van Praag, C.M. 2005. Succesful Entrepreneurshi: Confronting Economic Theory with Empirical Practice. Edward Elgar: Inggris
Zahra, S. A. 1991. Predictors and Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 6(4): 259-285
The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga (JEBA) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
.png)
