SATISFACTION TOWARD LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: EXTENDED SCALE OF EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM QUALITY
Downloads
Introduction: Consideration against educational system quality in the context of the learning management system has increased during the pandemic period. An inconsistent finding concerning the influence of educational system quality on satisfaction has been identified. To fill this gap in the existing literature, this study aims to extend the educational system quality scale and examine its influence on students' satisfaction.
Methods: Based on an intensive literature review step, device flexibility was proposed as an extended indicator. To validate and examine the proposed hypothesis, this study employed the quantitative method of PLS-SEM. Data were collected from 90 students who actively used learning management systems.
Results: Our findings showed that device flexibility is valid and reliable as an educational system quality indicator. Besides, our proposed hypothesis is also confirmed. Through the structural model assessment, the influence of educational system quality on students' satisfaction is found to be significant.
Conclusion and suggestion: Device flexibility has been proven as an educational system quality indicator. In order to maintain students' satisfaction, system developers are suggested to keep improving learning management system applications, primarily on smartphone devices.
Aboagye, E., Yawson, J. A., & Appiah, K. N. (2020). COVID-19 and E-Learning: The Challenges of Students in Tertiary Institutions. Social Education Research, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.212021422
Adzovie, D. E., & Jibril, A. B. (2022). Assessment of the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on the prospects of e-learning in higher learning institutions: The mediating role of academic innovativeness and technological growth. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2041222. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2041222
Al Mulhem, A. (2020). Investigating the effects of quality factors and organizational factors on university students' satisfaction with e-learning system quality. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1787004. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1787004
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Alkhateeb, M. A., & Abdalla, R. A. (2021). Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction Towards Using Learning Management System Moodle: International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(1), 138–153.
https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2021010109
Almaiah, M. A., & Alismaiel, O. A. (2019). Examination of factors influencing the use of mobile learning system: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 885–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9810-7
Asad, M. M., Hussain, N., Wadho, M., Khand, Z. H., & Churi, P. P. (2021). Integration of e-learning technologies for interactive teaching and learning process: An empirical study on higher education institutes of Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2020-0103
Camilleri, M. A., & Camilleri, A. C. (2022). The Acceptance of Learning Management Systems and Video Conferencing Technologies: Lessons Learned from COVID-19. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(4), 1311–1333.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09561-y
Chou, H. L., & Chou, C. (2019). A quantitative analysis of factors related to Taiwanese teenagers' smartphone addiction tendency using a random sample of parent-child dyads. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 335–344.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.032
Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, G., Burton, R., Magni, P., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1).
https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
Dangaiso, P., Makudza, F., & Hogo, H. (2022). Modeling perceived e-learning service quality, student satisfaction and loyalty. A higher education perspective. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2145805. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2145805
Daultani, Y., Goswami, M., Kumar, A., & Pratap, S. (2021). Perceived outcomes of e-learning: Identifying key attributes affecting user satisfaction in higher education institutes. Measuring Business Excellence, 25(2), 216–229.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-07-2020-0110
Hair, J. F., Hult, T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Sage.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012). A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 10959–10966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.028
Kompas.com. (2023). Aptisi Sevima Kolaborasi Atasi Kesenjangan Digital Perguruan Tinggi. https://lestari.kompas.com/read/2023/07/05/070000486
Lee, E.-Y., & Jeon, Y. J. J. (2020). The Difference of User Satisfaction and Net Benefit of a Mobile Learning Management System According to Self-Directed Learning: An Investigation of Cyber University Students in Hospitality. Sustainability, 12(7), 2672. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072672
Lee, J. W. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 277–283.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.08.002
Luo, T., Murray, A., & Crompton, H. (2017). Designing Authentic Learning Activities to Train Pre-Service Teachers About Teaching Online. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7).
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3037
Mella-Norambuena, J., Cobo-Rendon, R., Lobos, K., Sáez-Delgado, F., & Maldonado-Trapp, A. (2021). Smartphone Use among Undergraduate STEM Students during COVID-19: An Opportunity for Higher Education? Education Sciences, 11(8), 417.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080417
Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users' perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044
Mushtaha, E., Abu Dabous, S., Alsyouf, I., Ahmed, A., & Raafat Abdraboh, N. (2022). The challenges and opportunities of online learning and teaching at engineering and theoretical colleges during the pandemic. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(6), 101770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101770
Navimipour, N. J., & Zareie, B. (2015). A model for assessing the impact of e-learning systems on employees' satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.026
Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
Prasad, P. W. C., Maag, A., Redestowicz, M., & Hoe, L. S. (2018). Unfamiliar technology: Reaction of international students to blended learning. Computers & Education, 122, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.016
Richter, N. F., Sinkovics, R. R., Ringle, C. M., & Schlägel, C. (2016). A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 376–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2014-0148
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of Market Research (pp. 1–40). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
Shehzadi, S., Nisar, Q. A., Hussain, M. S., Basheer, M. F., Hameed, W. U., & Chaudhry, N. I. (2021). The role of digital learning toward students' satisfaction and university brand image at educational institutes of Pakistan: A post-effect of COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(2), 276–294.
https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-04-2020-0063
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(2), 18–27.
Xing, W., Kim, S. M., & Goggins, S. (2015). Modeling Performance in Asynchronous CSCL: An Exploration of Social Ability, Collective Efficacy and Social Interaction. CSCL 2015 Proceedings.
Zhang, Z., Cao, T., Shu, J., & Liu, H. (2020). Identifying key factors affecting college students' adoption of the e-learning system in mandatory blended learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1388–1401.
Copyright (c) 2023 Hendrick Hernando, Afina Hasya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga agree to the following terms:The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga (JEBA) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
.png)
