PENGARUH PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT TERHADAP TASK PERFORMANCE DAN CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE PADA PT. NaSDEC INDONESIA DI SURABAYA
Downloads
In the world of design and manufacture of cruise ships that move in fast and dynamic, the company tried to survive, grow and develop so that they cannot lose with competitors. To realize the necessary human resource management that have high integrity and capabilities which can meet the demands of the company. PT. NaSDEC Indonesia is one of the private companies engaged in the field of ship design which considers important psychological empowerment which can improve task performance and contextual performance.
This research consists of three variables, namely, psychological empowerment, task performance and contextual performance. Based on the Foundation of theory that is used and the formulation of the problem posed, there are four hypotheses. Calculations using the regressions analysis that includes a test of validity, reliability, multiple linear regression analysis, test the assumptions of classical analysis, correlation, analysis of the coefficient of determination (R2), simultaneous testing (test F) and partial test (t).
The results of testing against the employees of PT. NaSDEC Indonesia in Surabaya produces: (1) Meaning, competence, self-determination and the impact of significant effect simultaneously against task performance,
(2) Self-determination and impact effect significantly partially against the task performance, (3) Meaning, competence, self-determination and the impact of significant effect simultaneously against contextual performance, (4) the impact of significant effect partially against contextual performance.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Armstrong, M. (2007). Human performance management strategies and practical guidance,translated by Nasser Mirsepasi and Ismaeelkavoosi and Ali Rashipur, Publisher, first edition.
Ashforth, B.E. 1989. The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43: 207-242.
Azwar, Saifuddin, 1997, Reliabilitas dan Validitas (Edisi Ketiga), Pustaka Pelajar Offset, Yogyakarta. Bateman, & Organ. (1983). Job Satisfaction and Good Soldire: The Relationship Between Affects and Employee
Citizenship. Acad.manage.J , 26, 587-595.
Beaty, J.C. ; Cleveland. J.N. ; dan Murphy, K.V., (2001), "The Relation Between Personality and Contextual Performance in "Strong” Versus "Weak” Situations”, Human Performance, 14 (2) :125-148
Bennis & Nanus (1985); Teori Leadership : Pendekatan Karismatik dan Transformational.
Borman, W. C.,&Motowidlo,S.J. (1993). Expanding the criteria domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W.C. Borman (Eds), Personal selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Motowidlo, S., & J.Van Scotter (1994), "Evidence that Task Performance Should be Distinguished from Contextual Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-480.
Borman, W., & Motowidlo, S. (1997). Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research. Human performance. , 10, 99-109.
Borman, W.C., 2004. The concept of organizational citiship. Current Directions in Psychologial Science 13 (6), 238-241.
Borman, W.C., White, L.A., Dorsey, D.W., 1995. Effects of rate task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance rating. Journal of Applied Psychology. 80 (1), 168-177.
Bowen, D.E. and Lawler, E.E. (1992). "The Empowerment of Service Workers: what, why, how, and when. "Sloan Managemenent Review” 33(3); pp. 31-39.
Chiang,C.F.&Hsieh,T.S. (2012). "The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on the job performance: The mediating effects of organizational citiship behavior”, International of Hospintal Management. 31,PP.180-190.
Clutterbuck, David., The Power of Empowerment. Kogan Page, 2003.
Cokluk O, Sekercioglu G, Buyukozturk S (2010). Multivariate Statistics for Social Sciences. SPSS and LISREL applications. Ankara: Pegem Academic Publications.
Colemen, V.I., & Borman, W.C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 24-44.
Collins, F, 1982. "Managerial accounting systems and organizational control: a role perspective." Accounting, Organizations and Society 7(2): pp. 107-12.
Conger JA, & Kanungo RN (1988). The Empowerment Process: Integrating theory and practice. Acad.
Manage. Rev., 13(3): 471-482.
Cook, Sarah and Macaulay, Steve, 1997, Perfect Empowerment (Pemberdayaan yang Tepat), edisi terjemahan, Alih bahasa: Paloepi Tyas., R., pt. Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.
Cooper, Donald R. & Pamela S. Schindler. (2006). Metode Riset Bisnis (volume 2 edisi 9). Jakarta: PT. Media Global Edukasi.
Dimitriades, Z. (2007). Individual, job, organizational and contextual correlates of employement empowerment: some greek evidence. EJBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 9(2), 36-43. Februari 7, 2010. http://ejbo.jyu.fi/pdf/ejbo_vol9_no2_pages_36_43.pdf.
Edwards B. D et al. (2008). Relationships between facets of job satisfaction and task and contextual performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57: 441-465.
Greasley, K., Bryman, A., Dainty, A., Price A., Soetantanto, R., and King, N. (2005) "Employee perceptions of empowerment”, Employee Relations, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.354-368.
Ghozali, Imam. 2007. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Hasan, Iqbal. 2009. Analisis Data Penelitian dengan Statistik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Hogan, J., Rybicki, S.L., Motowidlo, S.J., & Borman, W.C. (1998). Relations between contextual performance, personality, and occupational advancement. Human Performance, 11, 189-207.
Ivancecich, J. M., Konopaste, Matteson, Michael T. 2007. Perilaku dan Manajemen Organisasi. Edisi ke 7.
Jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Jackson, S.E. and Schuler, R.S, 1985. "A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 36: pp. 16-78.
Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J. and Sparrowe, R.T. (2000). An examination of mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relationship between the job, interpersonal relationship, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (3): 407-416.
Onne Janssen & Nico W. Van Yperen (University of Groningen). 2004. Employees' Goal Orientations, the Quality of Leader-Member Exchange, and the Outcomes of Job Performance and Job Satisfaction. Academy of Manegement Journal, vol 47, no 3, 368-384
Joseph E. Hair, Wiliam C. Black. 2006. Multivarance Data Analysis. Elevent Edition. Upper Saddle River: Person Education.
Keiffer, C.H., Citizen Empowerment: A Development Perspective, Preventionin Human Service, Vol. 3. USA. Kiryanto (2000), "Analisis Pengaruh Penerapan Struktur Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib
Pajak Badan Dalam Memenuhi Kewajiban Pajak Penghasilannya,” EKOBIS, Vol. 1 No. 1, p. 41 – 52.
Klagge J (1998). The Empowerment Squeeze-views From the Middle Management Position. J. Manage. Dev.,.
(8): 548- 558.
Kotelnikov, Vadim, "Small and Mediun Enterprises and ICT”, Asia-Pasific Development Information Programme- UNDP, 2006.
Malhotra, N.K. 1996. Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. 2th Edition.New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Maslach, c. & Jackson, S. (1976). Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press
Maslach, C. & Jackson, S.E. (1981). The Measurement of Experienced Burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, Vol II.
Matthews,R.A.&Diaz, W.M.&Cole,S.G.(2003). "The Organizational Empowerment Scale”, Personnel Review.
Vol. 32, No.3,pp. 297-318.
Mirkamali, M., Nastizaie, N. (2010). Studying the relationship between psychological empowerment and job satisfaction in nursing staff, Journal of Nursing and Midwifery,2:104-113
Motowidlo, S.J., & Schmit ,M.J. (1999). Performance assessment in unique jobs. In D.R. llgen & E.D. Pulakos (Eds). The changing nature of performance (pp. 56-86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Motowidlo, S.J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-480.
Motowidlo, S.J., Borman, W.C., Schmitt, M.J., 1997. A theory of individual difference in task and contextual performance. Human Performance 10(2), 71-83.
Murphy, P. R., & Jackson, S. E. (1999). Managing work role performance: Challenges for twenty-first-century organizations and their employees. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development(pp. 325-365). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nazir, Mohammad. (2000). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
Niehoff, B.P. & Moorman, R.H., (1993), "Justice as a Mediator of The Relationship Between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Academy of Management Journal, 36(3) : 527-556.
Nelson, W. (2005). Home of Farm Fresh Biodiesel
Rafiq, M & Ahmed, PK (1998) A Contingency Model for Empowering Customer Contact Service Employees, Management Decision, 36 (9/10),pp. 686-693
Robbins, Stephan P.(1993), Organizational Behavior, Prentice Hall International Editions, Sixth Edition, Englewood Cliffts, New Jerset
Ruky.AS, (2001). Sistem Manajemen Kinerja: Performance Management System. Panduan praktis untuk merancang dan meraih kinerja. Prima Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Parasuraman, A., V.A. Zeithaml & L.L. Berry. 1994. "Servqual: Review, Critique Research Agenda”, Journal of Marketing, page 111-124.
Santosa, Singgih, 2000, Buku Latihan SPSS Statistik Parametrik, PT. Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta Scotter,v., & Motowidlo. (1996). Evidence for two factors of contextual performance:job description and
interpersonal facilitation.J.Appl.psychol,81,525-531.
Sitiawati, D. & Zulkaida, A.. (2007). Perbedaan komitmen kerja berdasarkan orientasi peran gender pada karyawan di bidang kerja non tradisional. ISSN (2), 1858-2599
Solimun, (2005), Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Aplikasi Software AMOS, Fakultas MIPA & Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Brawijaya Malang.
Sonnetag.S. & Frese, M. (2001). Performance Concept and Performance Theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance.
Spreitzer, G. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimentions, Measurment and validation.
Acad.manage.J , 38(5),, 1442-1466.
Spreitzer GM, Kizilos MA, Nason SW (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiviness, satisfaction and strain.J.Manage., 23(5): 679-704
Spreitzer, G.(2007). "Taking Stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work”. Sugiyono. 2004. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta, CV. Bandung
Sukmadinata., 2006. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung. Sumarsono, 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Akuntansi, Surabaya.
Thomas KW, Velthouse BA (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "Interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation Acad. Manage. Rev., 5(4): 666-681.
Thomas, K.W. and Tymon, W. (1994) Does empowerment always work: understanding the role of intrinsic motivation and personal interpretation. Journal of Management systems, 6(2), 113.
Tubre, T. C., & Collins, J. M. 2000. Jackson and Schuler, 1985 Revisited: "Meta-analysis of the relationships between role ambiguity, role conflict and job performance”. Journal of Management, 26, 155–169.
Yukl, Gary., 2001, Kepemimpinan Dalam Organisasi. Edisi ke Lima (Budi Supriyanto, Penerjemah), Jakarta, Indeks.
Van Scotter, J.R, Motowidlo SJ (1996). Evidence for Two Factors of Contextual Performance: Job Dedication and Interpersonal Facilitation. J. Appl. Psychol., 81: 525-531.
Van Scotter J.R. (2000). Relationship of task performance and contextual performance with turnover, job satisfaction, and affective commitment. Human resource management review, 10(1): 79-95.
Van Scotter, J.R., Motowidlo, S.J., Cross, T.C., 2000. Effects of task and contextual performance on systematic reward. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (4), 526-535.
Vogt, & Murrel. (1990). Empoverment in Organizations,. Pfeiffer and Co, Amsterdam, P. , 8.
Witt, L.A., Kacmar, K.M., Carlson, D.S., Zivnuska, S., 2002. Interactive effects of personality and organizational politics on contextual performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23, 911–926.
Werner, J.M., 2000. Implications of OCB and contextual performance for human resource management.
Human Resource Management Review 10 (1), 3–24.
The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga (JEBA) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
.png)
