ECOLOGICALLY UNEQUAL EXCHANGE, AND FOREST LOSS: HOW AFRICA'S DEMAND FOR CPO IMPACTS THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT IN INDONESIA?
Downloads
Introduction: This study examines the environmental consequences of increased Indonesian crude palm oil (CPO) exports to African markets, emphasizing deforestation impacts.
Methods: Using annual time-series data from 1980 to 2023, an Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) econometric model is employed to capture both short-term dynamics and long-term equilibrium relationships.
Results: The findings robustly confirm the Ecologically Unequal Exchange (EUE) hypothesis, revealing significant negative impacts of Indonesian palm oil exports on domestic forest cover. Specifically, increased palm oil exports, agricultural land expansion, GDP growth, migration patterns, and demographic pressures from urban and rural populations collectively exacerbate deforestation rates. Empirical results also confirm a stable long-term cointegration among these variables, highlighting enduring environmental risks associated with export-driven agricultural strategies.
Conclusion and suggestion: Policymakers must integrate sustainability into trade policies, enhance international cooperation for responsible agricultural practices, and strengthen regulatory frameworks to mitigate environmental damage effectively.
Abman, R., & Lundberg, C. (2019). Does free trade increase deforestation? The effects of regional trade agreements. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 7(1), 35–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/705787
Austin, K. F. (2010). Soybean exports and deforestation from a world-systems perspective: A cross-national investigation of comparative disadvantage. The Sociological Quarterly, 51(3), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01180.x
DeFries, R. S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M., & Hansen, M. (2010). Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience, 3(3), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO756
Grabs, J., & Garrett, R. D. (2023). Goal-based private sustainability governance and its paradoxes in the Indonesian palm oil sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 188, 467–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05377-1
Kan, S., Chen, B., Persson, U. M., Chen, G., Wang, Y., Li, J., & Kastner, T. (2023). Risk of intact forest landscape loss goes beyond global agricultural supply chains. One Earth, 6(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.12.006
Móstiga, M., Armenteras, D., Vayreda, J., & Retana, J. (2024). Decoding the drivers and effects of deforestation in Peru: A national and regional analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04638-x
Paradis, E. (2021). Forest gains and losses in Southeast Asia over 27 years: The slow convergence towards reforestation. Forest Policy and Economics, 122, 102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102332
Pendrill, F., Persson, U. M., Godar, J., & Kastner, T. (2019). Deforestation displaced: Trade in forest-risk commodities and the prospects for a global forest transition. Environmental Research Letters, 14(5), 055003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0d41
Roux, N., Kastner, T., Erb, K.-H., & Haberl, H. (2021). Does agricultural trade reduce pressure on land ecosystems? Decomposing drivers of the embodied human appropriation of net primary production. Ecological Economics, 181, 106915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106915
Shandra, J. M., Restivo, M., & Sommer, J. M. (2019). Appetite for destruction? China, ecologically unequal exchange, and forest loss. Rural Sociology, 84(2), 344–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12292
Shandra, J. M., Restivo, M., & Sommer, J. M. (2019). Do China's environmental gains at home fuel forest loss abroad? A cross-national analysis. Journal of World-Systems Research, 25(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2019.761
Sommer, J. M. (2019). Ecologically unequal exchange and national governance: A cross-national analysis of forest loss. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(6), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1869
Sommer, J. M., Restivo, M., & Shandra, J. M. (2020). China, mining, and forests: A cross-national test of ecologically unequal exchange. The Sociological Quarterly, 61(3), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2020.1756519
Sommer, J. M., Restivo, M., & Shandra, J. M. (2022). Corrupting ecologically unequal exchange? India and forest loss in a cross-national perspective. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 8, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221112123
Sommer, J. M., Restivo, M., & Shandra, J. M. (2023). Ecologically unequal exchange, repression, and forest loss: How China's demand for agricultural products impacts the natural environment. Environmental Development, 46, 100866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100866
Tester, A. W. (2020). Deforestation in the Global South: Assessing uneven environmental improvements 1993–2013. Sociological Perspectives, 63(3), 478–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420908900
Copyright (c) 2025 Fadel Nugraha, Pauline Chepkwisich Tarit, Tumelo Sebalo, Devi Anggrayni, Indah Susilowati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga agree to the following terms:The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga (JEBA) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
