BAITUL MAAL WA TAMWIL DIGITALIZATION AND MILLENNIALS ACCEPTANCE IN INDONESIA
Downloads
Digitalization in microfinance institutions, including Sharia-compliant ones such as Baitul Maal wa Tamwil (BMT), is considered crucial for several reasons, including operational efficiency, increased financial inclusion, and rising demand in the evolving financial ecosystem. As a crucial tool for alleviating poverty and empowering marginalized communities, the integration of digital technology has become a necessity, not an option. This research examines the factors that influence millennials’ use of digital financial technology developed by BMT. This study employed the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) processed through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in SmartPLS with 108 respondents. The sample consisted of millennial- generation Islamic digital BMT users in Indonesia who have at least one experience using it. The sampling technique used was accidental sampling, and data collection was carried out for one month. The results indicated that all hypotheses were accepted. Ease of use significantly affected users' attitudes, as did the usefulness for behavior. This finding implies that if a digital BMT platform is easier to use, it will lead to more positive attitudes among its users. , the more useful a digital BMT platform is, the more positively its users will behave and the more likely they will be to use it in the future.
Adnan, M. A., & Ajija, S. R. (2015). The Effectiveness of Baitul Maal Wat Tamwil in Reducing Poverty: The Case of Indonesian Islamic Microfinance Institution. Humanomics, 31(2), 160–182. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/H-03-2012-0003
Ahmad, K., & Yahaya, M. H. (2023). Islamic social financing and efficient zakat distribution: impact of fintech adoption among the asnaf in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(9), 2253–2284. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2021-0102/FULL/XML
Aji, H. M., & Adawiyah, W. R. (2022). How e-wallets encourage excessive spending behavior among young adult consumers? Journal of Asia Business Studies, 16(6), 868–884. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-01-2021-0025
Ajija, S. R., Hudaifah, A., Wasiaturrahma, Sulistyaningsih, L., A’yun, K. Q., Mukti, H. K., Salama, S. C. U., Rofiqoh, S. N. I., & Azzizah, U. A. (2018). Koperasi BMT: Teori, Aplikasi dan Inovasi. Inti Medika Komunika.
Ajija, S. R., & Salama, S. C. U. (2024). Intention of Muslim Millennials to Invest in Islamic Peer-to-Peer Lending in Indonesia. Journal of Developing Economies, 9(2), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.20473/jde.v9i2.51449
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
Al Karim, R., Rabiul, M. K., Taskia, A., & Jarumaneerat, T. (2023). Millennial Customer Engagement with Fintech Services: The Mediating Role of Trust. Business Perspectives and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337231183275
Alagu, R. M., Sundaram, E. G., & Natarajan, E. (2012). Technology Acceptance Model: A Survey of Literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), 2(4), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.132
Al-Hashfi, R. U., & Zusryn, A. S. (2020). Exploring Islamic Peer-To-Peer Lending for the Unbankable. Airlangga International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance, 2(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.20473/aijief.v2i2.20648
Al-Okaily, M. (2023). The influence of e-satisfaction on users’ e-loyalty toward e-wallet payment apps: a mediated-moderated model. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 20(6), 2428–2454. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2022-1313/FULL/XML
Alshammari, H., & Rosli, S. (2020). A Review of Technology Acceptance Models and Theories. A Review of Technology Acceptance Models and Theories. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 4(2), 12–22.
Alsmadi, A. A., Aalrawashdeh, N., Al-Gasaymeh, A., Al_hazimeh, A. M. d., & Alhawamdeh, L. (2024). Adoption of Islamic Fintech in lending services through prediction of behavioural intention. Kybernetes, 53(6), 1921–1938. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2022-1362
Amnas, M. B., Selvam, M., & Parayitam, S. (2024). FinTech and Financial Inclusion: Exploring the Mediating Role of Digital Financial Literacy and the Moderating Influence of Perceived Regulatory Support. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 2024, Vol. 17, Page 108, 17(3), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/JRFM17030108
Amri, M. C. E. L., Mohammed, M. O., & AlKhalili, M. M. S. (2024). FINTECH ADOPTION AND ITS INVESTMENT IMPACT IN ISLAMIC SOCIAL FINANCE: THE CASE OF ZAKAT. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 12(2), 213–254. https://doi.org/10.21043/QIJIS.V12I2.17069
Ascarya, A., & Sakti, A. (2022). Designing Micro-Fintech Models for Islamic Micro Financial Institutions in Indonesia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(2), 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/imefm-05-2020-0233
Asif, M., Khan, M. N., Tiwari, S., Wani, S. K., & Alam, F. (2023). The Impact of Fintech and Digital Financial Services on Financial Inclusion in India. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16020122
Aysan, A. F., & Syarif, M. F. (2025). Fusion of Blockchain and Islamic Fintech: Unlocking New Possibilities in SME Financing, Financial Well-Being, and Trade Financing. Disruptive Technologies and Muslim Societies: From AI and Education to Food and Fintech, 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781800616295_0015
Balakrishnan, V., & Shuib, N. L. M. (2021). Drivers and inhibitors for digital payment adoption using the Cashless Society Readiness-Adoption model in Malaysia. Technology in Society, 65(March), 101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101554
Balaskas, S., Koutroumani, M., Komis, K., & Rigou, M. (2024). FinTech Services Adoption in Greece: The Roles of Trust, Government Support, and Technology Acceptance Factors. FinTech 2024, Vol. 3, Pages 83-101, 3(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.3390/FINTECH3010006
Bayram, O., Talay, I., & Feridun, M. (2022). Can Fintech Promote Sustainable Finance? Policy Lessons From the Case of Turkey. Sustainability, 14(19), 12414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912414
Becker, J. M., Cheah, J. H., Gholamzade, R., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0474/FULL/XML
Bosnjak, M., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020). The Theory of Planned Behavior : Selected Recent Advances and Applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352–356.
Boustani, N. M. (2020). Traditional Banks and Fintech: Survival, Future and Threats. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 35, 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34269-2_24
Chong, F. H. L. (2021). Enhancing Trust Through Digital Islamic Finance and Blockchain Technology. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 13(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrfm-05-2020-0076
Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins , Developments and Future Directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf001443p
Conner, M. (2020). Theory of Planned Behavior. In Handbook of Sport Psychology (pp. 1–18). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119568124.ch1
Creta, F., & Mazaj, J. (2021). Can fintech progress the real estate sector? The disruptive role of crowdfunding &blockchain: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Islamic Finance. https://doi.org/10.13135/2421-2172/5323
Daqar, M. A. M. A., Arqawi, S., & Karsh, S. A. (2020). Fintech in the eyes of Millennials and Generation Z (the financial behavior and Fintech perception). Banks and Bank Systems, 15(3), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.03
Databoks.Katadata. (2023). Pengguna Fintech Indonesia Didominasi Kelompok Pendapatan Menengah. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/07/31/pengguna-fintech-indonesia-didominasi-kelompok-pendapatan-menengah
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.33621
Davis, F. D., & Granić, A. (2024a). Evolution of TAM. 19–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45274-2_2
Davis, F. D., & Granić, A. (2024b). The Technology Acceptance Model. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45274-2
Demir, A., Pesqué-Cela, V., Altunbas, Y., & Murinde, V. (2022). Fintech, financial inclusion and income inequality: a quantile regression approach. European Journal of Finance, 28(1), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1772335
Effendi, I., Murad, M., Rafiki, A., & Lubis, M. M. (2020). The application of the theory of reasoned action on services of Islamic rural banks in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(5), 951–976. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2020-0051
Effendi, K. A., & Widajatun, V. W. (2024). Growth of Islamic Fintech in Indonesia. Journal of Economics Finance and Management Studies, 07(06). https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i6-53
Emanuel-Correia, R., Duarte, F., Gama, A. P. M., & ... (2022). Does peer-to-peer crowdfunding boost refugee entrepreneurs? Finance Research …. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612321003068
Endro, W., Radianto, D., Christian Efrata, T., Dewi, L., Salim, I. R., Kurnia, D. P., & Putri, K. (2024). The Mediating Role of Value Congruence in Service Trust and Fintech Usage Among Millenials. Online) Journal of System and Management Sciences, 14(2), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2024.0215
Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Ferris, S. (2009). Millenials, social networking and social responsibility. In Adolescent Online Social Communication and Behavior: Relationship Formation on the Internet (pp. 167–182). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-926-7.ch011
Gonzalez, L. (2020). Blockchain, herding and trust in peer-to-peer lending. Managerial Finance. https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-09-2018-0423
Haidar, A. (2021). Developing Fintech-Micro BMT (FMB) Model. Ekonomi Islam Indonesia, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.58968/EII.V3I2.59
Hammadi, M. Al, Río, J. A. J. del, Ochoa-Rico, M.-S., Montero, O. A., & Vergara-Romero, A. (2024). Risk Management in Islamic Banking: The Impact of Financial Technologies Through Empirical Insights From the UAE. Risks, 12(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12020017
Hasan, M. M., Yajuan, L., & Khan, S. (2022). Promoting China’s Inclusive Finance Through Digital Financial Services. Global Business Review, 23(4), 984–1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919895348
Hosen, M., Lim, A. F., Jannat, T., Khan, N. R., & Pek, C. K. (2023). Millennials Fintech Services Adoption: What Matters Most? Studies in Computational Intelligence, 1128, 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48397-4_12
Hu, Z., Ding, S., Li, S., Chen, L., & Yang, S. (2019). Adoption Intention of Fintech Services for Bank Users: An Empirical Examination with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Symmetry 2019, Vol. 11, Page 340, 11(3), 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM11030340
Husaeni, U. A. (2021). the Role of Baitul Maal Wa Tamwil in the Economic Empowerment of Poor Women in Cianjur District. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 7(2), 917–923. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v7i2.2129
Ibrahim, M. H., Fitri, F., & Ahmad, R. S. (2024). The Role of Technology Readiness in Islamic Financial Technology Acceptance Among MSMEs: An Empirical Integration Analysis TPB and TAM Framework. AL-MUZARA’AH, 12(1), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.29244/JAM.12.1.177-194
Ichwan, I., & Kasri, R. (2019). Why Are Youth Intent on Investing Through Peer To Peer Lending? Evidence From Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(4), 741–762. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i4.1157
Indarningsih, N. A., Ma’wa, M. A. F., & Waliyuddinsyah, Muh. N. (2023). Zakat, infaq, shadaqah, and waqf using financial technology: Millennial generation perspective. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.VOL2.ISS1.ART2
Iqbāl, M., Muditomo, A., & Farezha, A. (2022). The Existence of Islamic Fintech in Encouraging National Economic Growth. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(3), 3145. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.5679
Khan, S., & Alhadi, F. A. F. (2022). Fintech and Financial Inclusion in Saudi Arabia. Review of Economics and Finance, 20(1), 857–866. https://doi.org/10.55365/1923.X2022.20.97
Kholidah, H., Fianto, B. A., Herianingrum, S., Ismail, S., & Mohd Hidzir, P. A. (2024). Do Islamic fintech lending promote microenterprises performance in Indonesia? Evidence of difference-in-difference model. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 18(1), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-08-2023-0310/FULL/XML
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 43(6), 740–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
Klein, G., Shtudiner, Z., & Zwilling, M. (2023). Why do peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms fail? The gap between P2P lenders’ preferences and the platforms’ intentions. Electronic Commerce Research, 23(2), 709–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10660-021-09489-6/METRICS
KNEKS. (2023). Pengembangan BMT menuju Sustainabilitas melalui Transformasi Digital. https://kneks.go.id/berita/548/pengembangan-bmt-menuju-sustainabilitas-melalui-transformasi-digital?category=1
Legass, H. A., & Durmuş, M. E. (2024). Factors determining the adoption of mobile banking in Ethiopian Islamic banks: extension of technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-02-2024-0051/FULL/XML
Lew, S., Tan, G. W., Loh, X., Hew, J., & Ooi, K. (2020). The disruptive mobile wallet in the hospitality industry: An extended mobile technology acceptance model. Technology in Society, 63(January), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101430
Ma, A., Nur, E., & Arruum, J. (2022). How do Baitul Maal Wat Tamwil empower Micro , Small and Medium Enterprises amidst COVID-19 pandemic ? A case of Indonesia. 5(1), 40–50.
Mardjono, A., & Setyawan, I. R. (2025). Moral Hazard, Adverse Selection, and Capital Structure in Fintech Microfinance in Indonesia. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.777
Masrizal, Sukmana, R., Trianto, B., & Zaimsyah, A. M. (2022). Determinant factor of crowdfunders’ behavior in using crowdfunding waqf model in Indonesia: two competing models. Journal of Islamic Marketing, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2021-0246
Meng, Y. (2021). A hybrid heterogeneous Pythagorean fuzzy group decision modelling for crowdfunding development process pathways of fintech-based clean energy investment projects. Financial Innovation, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00250-4
Miah, M. (2023). The Role of Fintech in Bridging the Divide for Economic Empowerment. Economics and Business, 37(1), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.2478/EB-2023-0013
Munikrishnan, U. T., Mamun, A. Al, Xin, N. K. S., Chian, H. S., & Naznen, F. (2022). Modelling the intention and adoption of cashless payment methods among the young adults in Malaysia. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2022-0077
Murshid, N. S., & Murshid, N. (2021). “Innovations” During COVID-19: Microfinance in Bangladesh. Affilia, 37(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099211054024
Muryanto, Y. T. (2022). The Urgency of Sharia Compliance Regulations for Islamic Fintechs: A Comparative Study of Indonesia, Malaysia and the United Kingdom. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(5), 1264–1278. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-05-2022-0099
Muryanto, Y. T., Kharisma, D. B., & Nugraheni, A. S. C. (2021). Prospects and Challenges of Islamic Fintech in Indonesia: A Legal Viewpoint. International Journal of Law and Management, 64(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-07-2021-0162
Najaf, K., Khalifa, A. H., Obaid, S., Rashidi, A. A., & Ataya, A. (2022). Does Sustainability Matter for Fintech Firms? Evidence From United States Firms. Competitiveness Review an International Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 33(1), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/cr-10-2021-0132
Niswah, F. M., Mutmainah, L., & Legowati, D. A. (2019). Muslim Millennial ’ S Intention of Donating for. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(3), 623–644.
Ong, H.-B., & Chong, L.-L. (2023). The effect of cashless payments on the internet and mobile banking. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 28(1), 178–188.
Ozili, P. K., & Mhlanga, D. (2024). Why is financial inclusion so popular? An analysis of development buzzwords. Journal of International Development, 36(1), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/JID.3812
Perwitasari, A. W. (2022). The Effect of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Easiness towards Behavioral Intention to Use Fintech by Indonesian MSMEs. Journal The Winners, 23(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21512/TW.V23I1.7078
Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2004). Consumer acceptance of online banking: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research, 14(3), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240410542652
Putri, G. A., Widagdo, A. K., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Analysis of financial technology acceptance of peer to peer lending (P2P lending) using extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOITMC.2023.100027
Rabbani, M. R., Khan, S., & Thalassinos, E. I. (2020). FinTech, blockchain and Islamic finance: An extensive literature review. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8(2), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/444
Rahim, N. @. F., Bakri, M. H., Fianto, B. A., Zainal, N., & Hussein Al Shami, S. A. (2023). Measurement and structural modelling on factors of Islamic Fintech adoption among millennials in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(6), 1463–1487. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2020-0279
Rana, M., Islam, H., Al Mamun, M. A., & Redwanuzzaman, M. (2025). FinTech’s impact on grocery retail in Bangladesh: a TAM approach. OPSEARCH, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12597-025-00955-5/METRICS
Robbana, A., Akbar, M. A., & Mohd, M. A. Bin. (2024). A structural equation modeling approach to assess the Algerian Zakat payers’ acceptability and adoption of a Zakat fintech-based model proposed. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2024-0352/FULL/XML
Sangwan, V., Harshita, Prakash, P., & Singh, S. (2020). Financial technology: a review of extant literature. Studies in Economics and Finance, 37(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-07-2019-0270
Shaikh, I. M., Qureshi, M. A., Noordin, K., Shaikh, J. M., Khan, A., & Shahbaz, M. S. (2020). Acceptance of Islamic financial technology (FinTech) banking services by Malaysian users: an extension of technology acceptance model. Foresight, 22(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-12-2019-0105
Sharma, V., Jangir, K., Gupta, M., & Rupeika-Apoga, R. (2024). Does service quality matter in FinTech payment services? An integrated SERVQUAL and TAM approach. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(2), 100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JJIMEI.2024.100252
Shih, H. P. (2004). Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior. Information & Management, 41(6), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2003.08.009
Shrestha, S. K., Mahat, D., Neupane, D., & Karki, T. B. (2025). E-wallet usage and customer purchase intention: Understanding the mediating role of shopping satisfaction and E-wallet structure. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(3), 2025091–2025091. https://doi.org/10.31893/MULTIREV.2025091
Singh, A. K., & Sharma, P. (2023). A study of Indian Gen X and Millennials consumers’ intention to use FinTech payment services during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Modelling in Management, 18(4), 1177–1203. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-02-2022-0059
Singh, J., & Singh, M. (2023). Fintech applications in social welfare schemes during Covid times: An extension of the classic TAM model in India. International Social Science Journal, 73(250), 979–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/ISSJ.12406
Singh, S., Sahni, M. M., & Kovid, R. K. (2020a). What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model. Management Decision, 58(8), 1675–1697. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2019-1318
Singh, S., Sahni, M. M., & Kovid, R. K. (2020b). What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model. Management Decision, 58(8), 1675–1697. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2019-1318
Sukarno, A., Haryono, S. T., Nusanto, G., Ambarwati, S. D. A., Sugandini, D., & Pamuji, W. A. (2024). The Effect of Financial Literacy, Motivation, Return to Investment, Social Media, and Fintech on Investment Intention in the Millennial Generation. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 13(3), 431–440.
Sunil, N., & Kumar, B. S. (2025). Financial Literacy and Fintech : A Double-Edged Sword for Millennial Investors’ Behavioral Biases. Indian Journal of Finance, 19(3), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.17010/IJF/2025/V19I3/174849
Supriadi, I., Maghfiroh, R. U., & Abadi, R. (2024). Decentralized Islamic Finance: Harnessing Blockchain Technology. El Dinar Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan Syariah, 12(1), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.18860/ed.v12i1.23333
Thakkar, J. J. (2020). Structural Equation Modelling. 285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3793-6
Uddin, H., & Barai, M. K. (2022). Will Digital Revolution Be Disruptive for the Inclusive Finance in Bangladesh? The Case of the Microfinance Industry. Evergreen, 9(4), 909–923. https://doi.org/10.5109/6622878
Visconti, R. M. (2020). Microfintech : Outreaching Financial Inclusion with Cost-Cutting Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3533873
Visconti, R. M. (2021). The Impact of Technology on Microfinance. In R. Moro-Visconti (Ed.), MicroFintech . Palgrave Studies in Financial Services Technology (pp. 105–163). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80394-0_4
Wahyudi, H., Tubarat, C. P. T., Rodliyah, N., Kusnadi, A., & Leny, S. M. (2025). The Nexus of Crowdfunding and e-Wakaf to Islamic Fintech in Indonesia in the Era of Industrial Revolution 5.0. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.62754/JOE.V4I1.4657
Wulandari, P. (2019). Enhancing the role of in giving financing to the poor at the bottom of the economic pyramid. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 10(3), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-01-2017-0005
Yin, W., Kirkulak-Uludag, B., Zhu, D., & Zhou, Z. (2023). Stacking ensemble method for personal credit risk assessment in Peer-to-Peer lending. Applied Soft Computing, 142, 110302. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASOC.2023.110302
Yumna, A. (2019). Islamic charity based micro-finance: lessons from Indonesia. Third International Conference On Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship (PICEEBA 2019), 97, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.2991/piceeba-19.2019.18
Zaidan, H., Shishan, F., Al-Hasan, M., Al-Mawali, H., Mowafi, O., & Dahiyat, S. E. (2024). Cash or cash-less? Exploring the determinants of continuous intention to use e-wallets: the moderating role of environmental knowledge. Competitiveness Review, 35(2), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-11-2023-0279/FULL/XML
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Every manuscript submitted to JEBIS must obey to the policy and terms set by Journal of Economics and Business Islamic.
- Publication rights on the contents of manuscript published by JEBIS is owned by JEBIS under consent and approval by the corresponding author(s).
- Full text of electronic publication of manuscripts can be accessed free if used for the purpose of education and research according to copyright regulation.
- Share ” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt ” remix, transform, and build upon the material
- You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
