Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal of Islamic Economics Science  (JIES) accepts original manuscripts in the field of Islamics Economics, including research reports, case reports, application of theory, critical studies and literature reviews. The spread of Islamic Economics include:

  1. Islamic Economic Macro and Micro Islamic
  2. Islamic Banking and Finance
  3. Islamic Capital Market


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process


All received manuscripts will be peer reviewed with the double-blind policy by at least 2 reviewers. The final decision of manuscripts will be made by editor in chief according to reviewers' comments in a forum of the editorial board meeting. Scanning of plagiarism on the manuscripts will be conducted by using Turnitin software.




1. The manuscript that has been selected by the editorial board will be submitted to the reviewer.

2. Manuscript review process carried out in a predetermined time period (a maximum of 4 weeks), if need extra time should confirm to the secretariat of the editors.

3. During the review process, reviewers follow the style guide scriptwriting

4. Reviewers check the substance of the text carefully to get the maening information text.

5. Reviewers checking the suitability and appropriateness of writing citations with a list of references / bibliography manuscript.

6. Reviewers noted and recommendations in writing to the improvement of the manuscript authors clearly;

7. The results of article reviews will be sent to the Chief Editor or Managing Editor by filling out the Review Form


Publication Frequency

Journal of Islamic Economics Science ini terbit sebanyak 2 (dua) kali dalam waktu satu tahun yaitu pada Bulan Maret dan Agustus


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...



Scanning of plagiarism on the manuscripts will be conducted by using Turnitin software



Publication Ethics



  • Objectivity and neutrality; the reviewer must be honest, objective, unbiased, independent, and only in favor of scientific truth. The process of reviewing the manuscript is done professionally regardless of sex, business side, tribe, religion, race, inter-group, and author's citizenship.
  • Clarity of reference sources; the reviewer should ensure that the reference resource/quotation is appropriate and credible (accountable). If errors or irregularities are found in the reference source/quotation writing, the reviewer should promptly inform the editor to be repaired by the author according to the reviewer's note.
  • Peer-reviewed effectiveness; the reviewer should respond to the manuscript submitted by the editor and work in accordance with the specified peer-review period (maximum 2 weeks). If additional time is required in the review the manuscript should promptly report (confirm) to the editorial secretariat.
  • Disclosure of conflicts of interest; the reviewer should understand the ethical publications above to avoid any conflict of interest with others, so the process of publishing the manuscript runs smoothly and safely.




  • Decision-making; the manager of the journal / editorial board should describe the mission and objectives of the organization, especially those relating to the determination of policy and decision of journal publishing without any particular interest.
  • Freedom; journal managers should give the reviewers and editors the freedom to create a comfortable working atmosphere and respect the privacy of the author.
  • Warranties and promotions; journal managers must guarantee and protect intellectual property rights (copyright), as well as transparent in managing funds received by third parties. In addition, journal organizers should publish and promote publication results to the public by providing assurance of usefulness in the use of the manuscript.


    Author's code of ethics aims to give birth to an original work, not a plagiarized work. In order to maintain the truth and the benefits and the meaning of information disseminated so as not to mislead the writer is expected to:

    1. Write carefully, thoroughly, and precisely.
    2. Responsible academically for his writing.
    3. Benefit the user community.
    4. uphold the rights, opinions or findings of others.
    5. Be fully aware of non-infringement.

    The author is said to violate the code of ethics when doing:

    1. Falsification
    2. Fabrication
    3. Plagiarism

    Data fabrication is to 'fabricate' data or create data that actually does not exist or more generally create fictitious data.

    Falsification of data is can mean to change the data in accordance with the wishes, especially to fit the conclusion that 'wanted' taken from a study.

    Plagiarism is taking words or sentences or texts of others without giving sufficient acknowledgment (in the citation).

    If the authors do plagiarism then he/she is considered to commit an intentional 'persecution' because there is a forced way of taking words/ideas without the permission of the owner.

    The classification of plagiarism can be made depending on various aspects of view:in terms of substance stolen,

    1. From the point of intent,
    2. In terms of volume/proportion
      1. Light plagiarism: <30%
      2. Medium plagiarism: 30-70%
      3. Severe plagiarism:> 70%
      4. From the pattern of theft, plagiarism can be done verbatim or can be sourced from various sources and with own words (mosaic).
      5. Based on the individual source of ideas, there is also known as Auto-plagiarism / self-plagiarism: If the work itself has been published before, then when we take the idea, it should include a reference or citation. Otherwise, this can be regarded as auto-plagiarism or self-plagiarism. This is feared because if intended or later used to add academic credit, it can be regarded as a serious violation of academic ethics.

    Someone who does one of three violations of academic ethics (falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism) can be said to have moral defects, especially when viewed through the eyes of religion. Religious value denounces violations as part of dishonesty, theft or taking possession of others without rights.