A Comparative Study of the Effects of Vibration and Electrical Stimulation Therapies on the Acceleration of Wound Healing in Diabetic Ulcers

Yunita Sari, S. Saryono, Eman Sutrisna, H. Hartono

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jn.v12i2.4460
Abstract views = 717 times | views = 435 times


Introduction: Diabetic ulcers accompanied by ischemia is difficult to treat. Such ulcers require therapy that can improve the blood flow. Previous studies have revealed that two therapies could improve blood flow and accelerate the healing of diabetic ulcers; vibration and electrical stimulation (ES). However, it is unknown which of these two therapies is best at accelerating wound healing in diabetic ulcers. The purpose of this study was to compare both therapies in relation to accelerating the wound healing of diabetic ulcers.

Methods: This study was an experimental study involving diabetic rats. The rats were divided into two groups: vibration and ES. Vibration and ES were applied for 10 minutes per day for 7 days. Wound size, inflammation, intensity of fibroblast infiltration, area of necrosis and degree of re-epithelialisation were compared. The difference in wound size was analysed using an independent t-test, while the histological data were analysed using a Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results: On day 5 onwards, there was a thin slough in the ES group which was not present in the vibration group. Day 4 onwards and the wound size was significantly smaller in the vibration group than in the ES group. The intensity of inflammation was significantly less, and the degree of fibroblast infiltration was significantly higher in the vibration group compared with the ES group. Re-epithelialisation was more advanced in the vibration group than the ES group.

Conclusion: Our study revealed that wound healing in diabetic ulcers following vibration was better than after ES. We suggest that nurses should use vibration rather than ES in clinical settings.


complementary therapy; diabetic ulcer; electrical stimulation; vibration; wound healing

Full Text:



Addison, G. M. et al. (1972) ‘Prostaglandin E1 in severe’, pp. 155–156.

Arashi, M. et al. (2010) ‘Vibration therapy accelerates healing of Stage I pressure ulcers in older adult patients’, Advances in skin & wound care, 23(7), pp. 321–327. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000383752.39220.fb.

Armstrong, D. G., Wrobel, J. and Robbins, J. M. (2007) ‘Guest editorial: Are diabetes-related wounds and amputations worse than cancer?’, International Wound Journal, 4(4), pp. 286–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00392.x.

Brechow, A. et al. (2013) ‘Improving major amputation rates in the multicomplex diabetic foot patient: focus on the severity of peripheral arterial disease’, Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 4(3), pp. 83–94. doi: 10.1177/2042018813489719.

V C Lees, T. P. D. F. (1994) ‘A freeze-injured skin graft model for the quantitative study of basic fibroblast growth factor and other promoters of angiogenesis in wound healing’, Br J Plast Surg, 47, pp. 349–359.

Cho, M. R. et al. (2000) ‘Integrin-dependent human macrophage migration induced by oscillatory electrical stimulation.’, Annals of biomedical engineering, 28(3), pp. 234–43. doi: 10.1114/1.263.

Demir, H., Balay, H. and Kirnap, M. (2004) ‘A comparative study of the effects of electrical stimulation and laser treatment on experimental wound healing in rats.’, Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 41(2), pp. 147–54. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2004.02.0147.

Eriksson, E. et al. (1981) ‘Effect of electrical stimulation on human skeletal muscle.’, International journal of sports medicine, 2(1), pp. 18–22. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034578.

Goldman, R. et al. (2003) ‘Electrotherapy promotes healing and microcirculation of infrapopliteal ischemic wounds: a prospective pilot study.’, Advances in skin & wound care, 17(6), pp. 284–294. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200407000-00010.

Hughes, J. M. et al. (2009) ‘Increased oxidant activity mediates vascular dysfunction in vibration injury.’, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 328(1), pp. 223–30. doi: 10.1016/S0749-4041(09)79206-1.

Izumi, Y. et al. (2006) ‘Risk of reamputation in diabetic patients stratified by limb and level of amputation: A 10-year observation’, Diabetes Care, 29(3), pp. 566–570. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.03.06.dc05-1992.

Kim, T. H., Cho, H. and Lee, S. M. (2014) ‘High-Voltage Pulsed Current Stimulation Enhances Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats by Restoring the Expression of Collagen, α-Smooth Muscle Actin, and TGF-β1’, The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 234(1), pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1620/tjem.234.1.

Koel, G. and Houghton, P. E. (2014) ‘Electrostimulation: Current Status, Strength of Evidence Guidelines, and Meta-Analysis’, Advances in Wound Care, 3(2), pp. 118–126. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0448.

Liebano, R. E. and Machado, A. F. P. (2014) ‘Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Release Following Electrical Stimulation in Human Subjects.’, Advances in wound care, 3(2), pp. 98–103. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0427.

Moulik, P. K., Mtonga, R. and Gill, G. V. (2003) ‘Amputation and mortality in new-onset diabetic foot ulcers stratified by etiology’, Diabetes Care, 26(2), pp. 491–494. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2.491.

Nagase, T. et al. (2007) ‘Heterotopic ossification in the sacral pressure ulcer treated with basic fibroblast growth factor: coincidence or side effect?’, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 60(3), pp. 327–329. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.11.043.

Nakagami, G. et al. (2007) ‘Effect of vibration on skin blood flow in an in vivo microcirculatory model’, BioScience Trends, 1(3), pp. 161–166.

Sari, Y., Saryono, et al. (2015) ‘Modifikasi Pompa ASI Sebagai Terapi Luka Bertekanan Negatif Untuk Mempercepat Penyembuhan Luka Diabetes’, 10(1), pp. 104–111.

Sari, Y., Sanada, H., et al. (2015) ‘Vibration inhibits deterioration in rat deep-tissue injury through HIF1-MMP axis’, Wound Repair and Regeneration, 23(3), pp. 386–393. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12286.

Sari, Y., Sutrisna, E. and Hartono (2016) ‘Pengaruh Frekuensi Vibrasi terhadap Penyembuhan Luka Diabetes The Provision of Different Vibration Frequency to Accelerate Diabetic Wound Healing’, Jurnal Keperawatan Padjajaran, 4, pp. 117–126.

Sari, Y., Sutrisna, E. and Hartono (2017) ‘The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Ulcer’, in The 3rd International Conference on Nursing (ICON) 2017. Malang, Indonesia.

Sebastian, A. et al. (2011) ‘Acceleration of cutaneous healing by electrical stimulation: Degenerate electrical waveform down-regulates inflammation, up-regulates angiogenesis and advances remodeling in temporal punch biopsies in a human volunteer study’, Wound Repair and Regeneration. Mosby, Inc., 19(6), pp. 693–708. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00736.x.

Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A. and Zimmet, P. Z. (2010) ‘Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030’, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 87(1), pp. 4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007.

Soewondo, P., Ferrario, A. and Tahapary, D. (2013) ‘Challenges in diabetes management in Indonesia: a literature review’, Globalization and Health, 9(1), p. 63. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-63.

Torkaman, G. (2014) ‘Electrical Stimulation of Wound Healing: A Review of Animal Experimental Evidence’, Advances in Wound Care, 3(2), pp. 202–218. doi: 10.1089/wound.2012.0409.

Ud-Din, S. and Bayat, A. (2014) ‘Electrical Stimulation and Cutaneous Wound Healing: A Review of Clinical Evidence’, Healthcare, 2(4), pp. 445–467. doi: 10.3390/healthcare2040445.

Ueda, K. et al. (2010) ‘A possible animal model for critical colonisation.’, Journal of wound care, 19(7), pp. 295–300.

Wu, S. C. et al. (2007) ‘Foot ulcers in the diabetic patient, prevention and treatment’, Vascular Health and Risk Management, 3(1), pp. 65–76. doi: 10.3310/hta13540.

Yusuf, S. et al. (2016) ‘Prevalence and Risk Factor of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in a Regional Hospital , Eastern Indonesia’, Open Journal of Nursing, 6(January), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2016.61001.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal NERS

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal is indexed by:





Creative Commons License

This journal (p-ISSN:1858-3598; e-ISSN:2502-5791) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License


Current Stats

Previous Stats