Indonesian Version of Blended Learning Satisfaction Scale: A Translation, Validation, and Reliability Study
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9186c/9186c248668fcb5bbee59aa757fbaa72c4b94a01" alt=""
Downloads
Additional Files
Introduction: Since COVID-19 2019 became a global pandemic, the blended learning method has gained popularity, including in nursing education. A valid and trustworthy questionnaire is required in Indonesia to measure blended learning satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of Indonesian BLSS, a validated tool from Taiwan, among nursing students.
Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional design to assess the validity and reliability of BLSS. The sample included 231 first-year nursing students from a university in Indonesia. The splitting sample method was utilized for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The BLSS was translated using forward and backward translation. Three experts validated the content, while EFA and CFA investigated the structural validity. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha.
Results: The content validity index (CVI) of BLSS was 0.975. The mean age of the respondents was 19.26 (0.05), with the majority being female (85.07%). In EFA, one factor was retained based on cumulative variance, a scree plot, and parallel analysis. The CFA also showed one factor as retained. The factor loading of each item was greater than 0.5 both in EFA and CFA. This instrument has an internal consistency of 0.955 according to Cronbach’s alpha.
Conclusion: The Indonesian BLSS is good, based on CVI, EFA, CFA and internal consistency analysis, which were used to measure satisfaction with blended learning. By measuring satisfaction following blended learning using BLSS, we hope that the learning process can be regarded as satisfactory and improved among nursing students.
Abd, T. M. K., Atussolihah, B., Kasillia, F. D. P., & Swaestya, D. (2022). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic at the High School Level. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 2605–2614.
Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
Andersen, B. L., Jørnø, R. L., & Nortvig, A.-M. (2021). Blending Adaptive Learning Technology Into Nursing Education: A Scoping Review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1), ep333. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11370
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Pontianak. (2021). Jumlah Tenaga Kesehatan Menurut Profesi dan Jenis Kelamin.
Blissitt, A. M. (2016). Blended Learning Versus Traditional Lecture in Introductory Nursing Pathophysiology Courses. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(4), 227–230. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20160316-09
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.
Cobo-Rendón, R., Bruna Jofre, C., Lobos, K., Cisternas San Martin, N., & Guzman, E. (2022). Return to University Classrooms With Blended Learning: A Possible Post-pandemic COVID-19 Scenario. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.957175
DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.
Gerdprasert, S., Pruksacheva, T., Panijpan, B., & Ruenwongsa, P. (2010). Development of a web-based learning medium on mechanism of labour for nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 30(5), 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.007
Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675
Hsu, L.-L. (2011). Blended learning in ethics education: A survey of nursing students. Nursing Ethics, 18(3), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733011398097
Hussey, I., & Hughes, S. (2020). Hidden invalidity among 15 commonly used measures in social and personality psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 166–184.
Li, C., He, J., Yuan, C., Chen, B., & Sun, Z. (2019). The effects of blended learning on knowledge, skills, and satisfaction in nursing students: A meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 82, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.08.004
Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2022). SOLOMON: a method for splitting a sample into equivalent subsamples in factor analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 54(6), 2665–2677.
Margulieux, L. E., McCracken, W. M., & Catrambone, R. (2016). A taxonomy to define courses that mix face-to-face and online learning. Educational Research Review, 19, 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.001
Polit, D. F. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Ruscio, J., & Roche, B. (2012). Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025697
Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., Escolar-Llamazares, M.-C., & Arnaiz González, Á. (2020). Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Nursing Education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051589
Sarmento, R. P., & Costa, V. (2019). Confirmatory factor analysis--a case study. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1905.05598.
Shi, J., Mo, X., & Sun, Z. (2012). [Content validity index in scale development]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao. Yi Xue Ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical Sciences, 37(2), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007
Sürücü, L., YIKILMAZ, İ., & MASLAKÇI, A. (2022). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) in Quantitative Researches and Practical Considerations. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fgd4e
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296.
Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S., & Jalaliyoon, N. (2022). Exploratory factor analysis; concepts and theory. Advances in applied and pure mathematics, 27, 375-382. World Health Organization.(2022). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 11th Revision. Retrieved from Https://Icd. Who. Int/Browse11/Lm/En.
Tavakol, M., & Wetzel, A. (2020). Factor Analysis: a means for theory and instrument development in support of construct validity. International Journal of Medical Education, 11, 245.
Tidbury, K., Sayers, M., Andiappan, M., & Newton, J. T. (2021). Psychometric validation of a pre-existing questionnaire used to measure patient satisfaction following orthodontic treatment in a UK population. Journal of Orthodontics, 48(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465312520985520
World Health Organization. (2009). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Http://Www. Who. Int/Substance_abuse/Research_tools/Translation/En/.
Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94.
Yu, Z., XU, W., & Sukjairungwattana, P. (2022). Meta-analyses of differences in blended and traditional learning outcomes and students’ attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926947
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ners
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ners agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the Copyright and grant Jurnal Ners the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to remix, adapt and build upon the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and of the initial publication in Jurnal Ners.
- Authors are permitted to copy and redistribute the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Ners.
Jurnal Ners requires a formal written declaration and transfer of copyright from the author(s) for each article published. We, therefore, ask you to complete and return this form, retaining a copy for your own records. Your cooperation is essential and appreciated. Any delay will result in a delay in publication. The form can be downloaded HERE.