Evaluating the FACIT-Sp-12: a systematic review of measurement properties of spiritual well-being in cancer patients
Downloads
Additional Files
Introduction: This study aims to investigate whether the FACIT-Sp-12's measurement properties yield the most accurate spiritual data for cancer patients.
Methods: This systematic review examined full-text studies written in English and involving patients with cancer published between 2000 and 2024, using cross-sectional, randomized controlled trials, case-control, and quasi-experimental designs. This study used the MEDLINE (PubMed and EBSCO), ScienceDirect, Scopus, Taylor and Francis, and selected ProQuest databases. We assessed the papers methodically using the PRISMA flow before reviewing ten of them. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments tool has been used for evaluating the review articles.
Results: We found that various studies on spirituality in cancer patients conducted in different countries have employed diverse research methods. All these studies used the FACIT-Sp-12, which has been modified and adapted for cultural contexts. Cronbach's alpha ranges from 0.70 to 0.91, indicating that FACIT-Sp-12 is consistent across studies. COSMIN has been used to evaluate and critique FACIT-Sp-12; however, its structural validity, Cronbach's alpha for the subscales, intraclass correlation, and measurement error remain unsatisfactory. Some publications examine hypotheses and provide satisfactory responses, but there is little discussion on criterion validity or cross-cultural adaptation.
Conclusions: We determined that patients with cancer could use the FACIT-Sp-12. This study suggests using the FACIT-Sp-12 spiritual assessment tool for cancer patients in research and nursing care.
Aktürk, Ü., et al. (2017). Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale. Palliative & Supportive Care, 15.6, 684–692.doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951517000013
Astrow, A. B., et al. (2018). Spiritual Needs and Perception of Quality of Care and Satisfaction With Care in Hematology/Medical Oncology Patients: A Multicultural Assessment. J Pain Symptom Manage, 55.1, 56–64.e1.doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.009
Bai, M. P. & Dixon, J. K. P. (2014). Exploratory Factor Analysis of the 12-Item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale in People Newly Diagnosed With Advanced Cancer. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 22.3, 404–420.doi: https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.22.3.404
Beaton, D. E., et al. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25.24, 3186–91.doi:
Berman, A. 2015. Kozier and Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing. Volumes 1-3. 3rd Australian edition ed. Melbourne, VIC: Pearson Australia.
Büssing, A., et al. (2010). Spiritual needs of patients with chronic pain diseases and cancer - validation of the spiritual needs questionnaire. Eur J Med Res, 15.6, 266–73.doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-6-266
Büssing, A., et al. (2018). Spiritual needs of mothers with sick new born or premature infants—A cross sectional survey among German mothers. Women and Birth, 31.2, e89–e98.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.08.002
Clarivate 2021. EndNote. 21 ed.
Costantini, M., et al. (2016). Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: A multicenter study of advanced cancer patients Cancer palliative care. BMC Palliative Care, 15.1.doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0095-6
Damen, A., et al. (2021). Validation of the FACIT-Sp-12 in a Dutch cohort of patients with advanced cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 30.11, 1930–1938.doi: 10.1002/pon.5765
De Jager Meezenbroek, E., et al. (2012). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: development of the Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List (SAIL). J Psychosoc Oncol, 30.2, 141–67.doi: 10.1080/07347332.2011.651258
Ernstmeyer, K., et al. 2021. Nursing fundamentals. [Madison, Wis.]: Wisconsin Technical College System Pressbooks [Madison, Wis.].
Eshghi, F., et al. (2023). An integrative review of defining characteristic of the nursing diagnosis "spiritual distress". Nurs Open, 10.5, 2831–2841.doi: 10.1002/nop2.1574
Ferrell, B. R., et al. (1995). Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res, 4.6, 523–31.doi: 10.1007/bf00634747
Haddaway, N. R., et al. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18.2, e1230.doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
Hosseini, M.-S., et al. (2024). Formulating research questions for evidence-based studies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2. 100046.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2023.100046
Jafari, N., et al. (2012). Translation and validation of the Persian version of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-Spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp) among Muslim Iranians in treatment for cancer. Palliative and Supportive Care, 11.1, 29–35.doi: 10.1017/S1478951512000727
Jimenez-Fonseca, P., et al. (2018). The mediating role of spirituality (meaning, peace, faith) between psychological distress and mental adjustment in cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 26.5, 1411–1418.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3969-0
Khalili, Z., et al. (2024). Correlation between spiritual health, anxiety, and sleep quality among cancer patients. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 20. 100668.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2024.100668
Lazenby, M., et al. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-being (FACIT-Sp) in an Arabic-speaking, predominantly Muslim population. Psycho-Oncology, 22.1, 220–227.doi: 10.1002/pon.2062
Lewis, S. M., et al. 2014. Medical-surgical nursing : assessment and management of clinical problems, St. Louis, Missouri, Elsevier/Mosby.
Liberati, A., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Bmj, 339. b2700.doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700
Mokkink, L. B., et al. (2016). The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther, 20.2, 105–13.doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
Nasution, L. A., et al. (2020). Effectiveness of Spiritual Intervention toward Coping and Spiritual Well-being on Patients with Gynecological Cancer. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 7.3, 273–279.doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_4_20
Nejat, N., et al. (2023). Assessment of spiritual needs in cancer patients: A cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care, 12.5, 894–901.doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_989_22
Noguchi, W., et al. (2004). Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-spiritual (FACIT-Sp) Japanese version in cancer patients--a preliminary study. Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 31.3, 387–391.doi:
Prinsen, C. a. C., et al. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27.5, 1147–1157.doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Rabitti, E., et al. (2020). The assessment of spiritual well-being in cancer patients with advanced disease: which are its meaningful dimensions? BMC Palliative Care, 19. 1–8.doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0534-2
Schultz, M., et al. (2017). Distinguishing Between Spiritual Distress, General Distress, Spiritual Well-Being, and Spiritual Pain Among Cancer Patients During Oncology Treatment. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 54.1, 66–73.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.018
Sharma, R. K., et al. (2012). The Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP): development and validation of a comprehensive instrument to assess unmet spiritual needs. J Pain Symptom Manage, 44.1, 44–51.doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.07.008
Smith, A. B., et al. (2007). A Rasch and factor analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Health Qual Life Outcomes, 5. 19.doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-19
Taylor, E. J. (2006). Prevalence and associated factors of spiritual needs among patients with cancer and family caregivers. Oncol Nurs Forum, 33.4, 729–35.doi: 10.1188/06.Onf.729-735
Terwee, C. B., et al. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27.5, 1159–1170.doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
Uijen, A. A., et al. (2012). Measurement properties of questionnaires measuring continuity of care: a systematic review. PLoS One, 7.7, e42256.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042256
Warsini, W., et al. (2024). The Relationship of Spiritual Health with the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients. Adi Husada Nursing Journal, 2, 151–157%V 10.doi: 10.37036/ahnj.v10i2.597
Who (2020). World fact sheets cancers. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 419. 1–2.doi:
Winkelman, C., et al. 2016. Medical-surgical nursing : patient-centered collaborative care : clinical companion : Ignatavicius, Workman, St Louis, Missouri, Elsevier.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ners
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ners agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the Copyright and grant Jurnal Ners the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to remix, adapt and build upon the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and of the initial publication in Jurnal Ners.
- Authors are permitted to copy and redistribute the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Ners.
Jurnal Ners requires a formal written declaration and transfer of copyright from the author(s) for each article published. We, therefore, ask you to complete and return this form, retaining a copy for your own records. Your cooperation is essential and appreciated. Any delay will result in a delay in publication. The form can be downloaded HERE.
