Faal Paru Difusi
[Lung Diffusion: A Review]
Downloads
Diffusion capacity is useful for measuring ability of pulmonary microcirculation to transfer oxygen and carbon dioxide from alveoli to capillaries. Physiological examination of diffusion is a continuation of physiological examination of ventilation. Diffusion capacity is measured by DLCO (Diffusing capacity for Carbon Monoxide). Measurement of oxygen diffusion capacity directly is very difficult so that indirect methods are used using carbonmonoxide (DLCO). Diffusion capacity of oxygen is equivalent to DLCO multiplied by 1.23. Normal value of DLCO is 20-30 ml/minute mmHg. Some factors that affect DLCO are Hb levels, COHb in smokers, and alveolar volume. Some techniques for measuring DLCO include Steady-state, Three-equation Single-breath, Nitrogen Washout, and Intra-breath DLCO. This test is indicated in pulmonary parenchymal disease (pulmonary fibrosis, asbestosis, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease), cystic fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, and pulmonary bleeding. DLCO is increased in asthma patients, obesity, polycythemia, intraalveolar bleeding, and right-left heart shunting. DLCO is decreased in emphysematous lung patients, pulmonary post resection, bronchial obstruction, multiple pulmonary embolism, anemia, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, asbestosis, sarcoidosis, vascular collagen disease, hypersensitive pneumonitis, and alveolar proteinosis.
Sylvia Anderson Price LMCW. Patofisiologi: Konsep Klinis Proses-Proses Penyakit. 6th Ed. Jakarta: Buku Kedokteran EGC, 2000.
Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Penyakit Paru. 4th Ed. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2006.
West JB. Patofisiologi Paru Esensial. 6th Ed. Jakarta: Buku Kedokteran EGC, 2010.
Eldridge L. Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs Test (DLCO). 2010.
Mccormack MC, Stoller JK and Hollingsworth H. Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide. 2010.
Hughes J. Diffusing Capacity (Transfer Factor) for Carbon Monoxide. In: Hughes J and Pride N, (Eds.). Lung Function Tests: Physiological Principles and Clinical Applications. London: WB Saunder, 2001, P. 93-106.
AARC Clinical Practice Guideline. Single-Breath Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity. American Association for Respiratory Care. Respiratory Care. 1993; 38: 511-5.
Malhotra P. Diffusion Capacity: (2004).
Morgan Scientific I. Lung Diffusing Capacity.
Ruppel G. Manual of Pulmonary Function Testing. Saint Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company, 1975.
Cotton D and Graham B. Single-Breath Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity or Transfer Factor: (Accessed January 3, 2012).
Hyatt R, Scanlon P and Nakamura M. Interpretation of Pulmonary Function Test: A Practical Guide. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009.
Mccarthy C. Pulmonary Function Testing. 2011.
Pesola GR, Sunmonu Y, Huggins G and Ford JG. Measured Diffusion Capacity Versus Prediction Equation Estimates in Blacks without Lung Disease. Respiration; International Review of Thoracic Diseases. 2004; 71: 484-92.
Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative Strategies for Lung Function Tests. The European Respiratory Journal. 2005; 26: 948-68.
Plummer AL. The Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity: Clinical Implications, Coding, and Documentation. Chest. 2008; 134: 663-7.
Macintyre N, Crapo RO, Viegi G, et al. Standardisation of the Single-Breath Determination of Carbon Monoxide Uptake in the Lung. The European Respiratory Journal. 2005; 26: 720-35.
Copyright (c) 2018 Alfian Nur Rosyid, Isnin Anang Marhana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
4. The Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under "the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.