Global research trends in partograph: A bibliometric analysis
Downloads
HIGHLIGHTS
- This study highlights growing global attention on the Partograph as a part of labor monitoring.
- Partograph use remains inconsistent and affects clinical decision-making and management of labor.
- Future studies should focus on digital monitoring and policy effectiveness in intrapartum care as a part of enhancing maternal and neonatal outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Objective: The present study aims to clarify the emerging patterns in partograph utilization, its development, and its impact on clinical practice.
Materials and Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using Scopus as the primary database. Articles were retrieved using the keywords “Partograph” or “Partogram” and analyzed using two strategies: performance analysis (Scopus “analyze” function) and network analysis (VOSviewer and NVivo).
Results: Five hundred and thirteen articles published between 1965 and 2025 were analyzed. Performance analysis revealed that the most cited studies focused on labor management, labor progression, and maternal and neonatal health outcomes. The leading publishing countries included Ethiopia, the United States, the United Kingdom, India, and South Africa. Network analysis identified strong connections between partograph research and healthcare quality, personnel delivery, and facilities. Research trends evolved from early studies on spontaneous delivery, dystocia, and maternal mortality to more recent investigations into partograph utilization as a healthcare service quality improvement tool. Pearson correlation analysis showed strong associations between partograph use and birth outcomes (0.81), mortality (0.78), and healthcare workers’ perspectives (0.76).
Conclusion: Research on partograph utilization continues to expand, focusing on labor monitoring and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Recently, studies have shifted toward labor-management quality, healthcare service improvement, and patient safety. However, certain areas remain underexplored, presenting opportunities for further research.
UNICEF. Despite recent progress, millions of births still occur without any assistance from a skilled attendant each year [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Mar 27]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/delivery-care/
UNICEF. Cross-Sector Indicators: Maternal Mortality Ratio (Number of Maternal Deaths per 100.000) [Internet]. UNICEF Data Warehouse. 2019 [cited 2022 May 4]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/resources/data_explorer/unicef_f/
Dol J, Hughes B, Bonet M, Dorey R, Dorling J, Grant A, et al. Timing of maternal mortality and severe morbidity during the postpartum period: a systematic review. JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Aug 1;20(9):2119–94.
Dhiya An AD, Emilia O. Knowledge, attitude, and skills of partograph utilization among health workers: a systematic review. 2023;12(1).
Khan ANS, Billah SM, Mannan I, Mannan II, Begum T, Khan MA, et al. A cross-sectional study of partograph utilization as a decision making tool for referral of abnormal labour in primary health care facilities of Bangladesh. PLOS ONE. 2018 Sep 6;13(9):e0203617.
Zelellw DA, Tegegne TK. Level of partograph utilization and its associated factors among obstetric caregivers at public health facilities in East Gojam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7).
Löwensteyn YN, Housseine N, Masina T, Browne JL, Rijken MJ. Birth asphyxia following delayed recognition and response to abnormal labour progress and fetal distress in a 31-year-old multiparous Malawian woman. BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Sep 11;12(9).
Taneja G, Sarin E, Bajpayee D, Chaudhuri S, Verma G, Parashar R, et al. Care around birth approach: A training, mentoring, and quality improvement model to optimize intrapartum and immediate postpartum quality of care in india. Global Health Science and Practice. 2021;9(3):590–610.
Hagos AA, Teka EC, Degu G. Utilization of partograph and its associated factors among midwives working in public health institutions, Addis Ababa city administration,Ethiopia,2017. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020;20(1).
Rodesch F, Ehman?Ellinger C, Wilkin P, Hubinont PO. Introduction, use, and results of a new Partogram. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1965;72(6):930–5.
Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021 Sep 1;133:285–96.
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics. 2010 Dec 1;85(3):741–54.
Zhang J, Landy HJ, Ware Branch D, Burkman R, Haberman S, Gregory KD, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;116(6):1281–7.
World HO maternal health and safe motherhood programme. World Health Organization partograph in management of labour. The Lancet. 1994;343(8910):1399–404.
Harvey SA, Blandón YCW, McCaw-Binns A, Sandino I, Urbina L, Rodríguez C, et al. Are skilled birth attendants really skilled? A measurement method, some disturbing results and a potential way forward. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2007;85(10):783–90.
Kavle JA, Stoltzfus RJ, Witter F, Tielsch JM, Khalfan SS, Caulfield LE. Association between anaemia during pregnancy and blood loss at and after delivery among women with vaginal births in Pemba Island, Zanzibar, Tanzania. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2008;26(2):232–40.
Studd J. Partograms and Nomograms of Cervical Dilatation in Management of Primigravid Labour. British Medical Journal. 1973;4(5890):451–5.
Leal MDC, Bittencourt SA, Esteves-Pereira AP, Ayres BVDS, Silva LBRAA, Thomaz EBAF, et al. Progress in childbirth care in Brazil: preliminary results of two evaluation studies. Cadernos de saude publica. 2019;35(7):e00223018.
Selin L, Almström E, Wallin G, Berg M. Use and abuse of oxytocin for augmentation of labor. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2009;88(12):1352–7.
Cardozo LD, Gibb DMF, Studd JWW, et al. Predictive value of cervimetric labour patterns in primigravidae. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1982;89(1):33–8.
Simic M, Cnattingius S, Petersson G, Sandström A, Stephansson O. Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: Population-based study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1).
Hassan WA, Eggebø T, Ferguson M, Gillett A, Studd J, Pasupathy D, et al. The sonopartogram: A novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;43(2):189–94.
King DA. The scientific impact of nations. Nature. 2004 Jul;430(6997):311–6.
van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010 Aug 1;84(2):523–38.
Eck NJV, Waltman L. VOSviewer Manual. 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 27]; Available from: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.18.pdf
Kune G, Oljira H, Wakgari N, Zerihun E, Aboma M. Determinants of birth asphyxia among newborns delivered in public hospitals of West Shoa Zone, Central Ethiopia: A casecontrol study. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2021;16(3 March). Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85102744503&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0248504&partnerID=40&md5=5c46f2a51eff23127b23183bc4560ec6
Litorp H, Gurung R, Målqvist M, Kc A. Disclosing suboptimal indications for emergency caesarean sections due to fetal distress and prolonged labor: a multicenter cross-sectional study at 12 public hospitals in Nepal. 2020;17(197):1–10.
Kosgei RJ, Gathara D, Kamau RK, Babu S, Mueke S, Cheserem EJ, et al. Quality of comprehensive emergency obstetric care through the lens of clinical documentation on admission to labour ward. East African Medical Journal. 2016;93(2):82–90.
Lavender T, Cuthbert A, Smyth RM. Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 6;8(8):CD005461.
Lavender T, Bernitz S. Use of the partograph - Current thinking. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020 Aug;67:33–43.
Negash BT, Alelgn Y. Proper partograph utilization among skilled birth attendants in Hawassa city public health facilities, Sidama region, Ethiopia, in 2021. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22(1).
Said A, Malqvist M, Pembe AB, Massawe S, Hanson C. Causes of maternal deaths and delays in care: comparison between routine maternal death surveillance and response system and an obstetrician expert panel in Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):614.
Bedwell C, Levin K, Pett C, Lavender DT. A realist review of the partograph: When and how does it work for labour monitoring? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2017;17(1). Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85010465430&doi=10.1186%2fs12884-016-1213-4&partnerID=40&md5=5b093a15eec7dc0bbb7c5a2ccbc850b2
Beyene MG, Zemedu TG, Gebregiorgis AH, Ruano AL, Bailey PE. Cesarean delivery rates, hospital readiness and quality of clinical management in Ethiopia: national results from two cross-sectional emergency obstetric and newborn care assessments. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Aug 19;21(1):571.
Tantu T, tantu T, Hailu Y, Gashaw D, Melkamu B. Prevalence and factors associated with low 5th minute APGAR score among mothers who birth through emergency cesarean section: prospective cross-sectional study in Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2025;25(1).
Blankenship SA, Raghuraman N, Delhi A, Woolfolk CL, Wang Y, Macones GA, et al. Association of abnormal first stage of labor duration and maternal and neonatal morbidity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020 Sep;223(3):445.e1-445.e15.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyright of the article is transferred to the journal, by the knowledge of the author, whilst the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
2. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share alike (CC BY-NC-SA), (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
3. The articles published in the journal are open access and can be used for non-commercial purposes. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation
The manuscript authentic and copyright statement submission can be downloaded ON THIS FORM.
