Aesthetic Performance Products as a Basis For Non Novelty of Industrial Design Based on The Public Domain Principle

Desy Rizki Ramadhani, Puteri Melati, Camellia Anand

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v2i1.13055
Abstract views = 210 times | downloads = 119 times

Abstract


Comparative products are very important and must be considered about it because, Industrial Design assesses the performance of products that can be proven from evidence that can be seen or assessed by clear eye such as photographic evidence, catalogs or other evidence that can be proved bye Industrial Design which has existed before. Industrial design is based on its external appearance which does not have an aesthetic impression and contradicts Article 1 point 1 of the Industrial Design Law and article 25 Paragraph 1 of the TRIPs agreement, which is form creation, solely for function or technical configuration. Aesthetically cannot be registered. In the absence of aesthetic elements, the product performance can be used as the basis for the absence of new industrial designs based on the principle of "Public Domain", considering the aesthetic elements are one of the requirements of an item that can be categorized as Industrial Design. In the other hand, the protection period has expired and became a "Public Domain" then it can be registered as an Industrial Design if it packed with an aesthetic elements. If an item does not have an aesthetic impression, it can be ascertained that the item is not an industrial design and can be possible not to have novelty and become public property. Aesthetic impressions do not contradict with the laws and regulations, but this is an important requirement so the design can be categorized as an industrial design. In ordinance No. 31 in 2000 concerning Industrial Design itself does not limit of the notion novelty and aesthetics so, the multiple interpretations are often occur.


Keywords


Aesthetic Performance Product; Novelty Industrial Design; Public Domain Principle.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bibliography

Andrieansjah Soeparman, Jenis Permohonan, Penilaian Kebaruan, dan Penggunaan Hak Desain Industri di Indonesia, (Media HKI Vol . IV/ No. 5/ Oktober 2007).

Artini Kusmiati, Dimensi Estetika Pada Karya Arsitektur dan Desain (Djambatan 2004).

Budi Agus Riswandi dan M. Syamsudin, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Budaya Hukum (RajaGrafindo Persada 2004).

Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum & Hak Asasi Manusia R.I. Pelatihan Konsultan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Modul: Desain Industri, Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Desain Industri (Jakarta. 2012).

Direktorat Jendral HKI. Petunjuk Teknis Pemeriksaan Desain Industri (2003).

Power Point Tim Pengajar Pelatihan Konsultan HKI Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Departemen Hukum & Hak Asasi Manusia R.I. MODUL: DESAIN INDUSTRI Pendaftaran Desain Industri (Jakarta 2012).

Sophar Maru Hutagalung, Hak Cipta kedudukan dan Peranannya dalam Pembangunan (Sinar Grafika 2012).

Regulations

Law Number 31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Design (Indonesian State Gazette Year 2000 Number 243, Additional of Indonesian State Gazette Number 4045).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Notaire

Lisensi Creative Commons

Notaire (p-ISSN 2721-8376, e-ISSN 2655-9404by http://e-journal.unair.ac.ic/ntr/index.php is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statcounter :

Jurnal Notaire Statistic

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

Notaire has been indexed by: