Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, East Java, Surabaya, Indonesia; Widodo Hospital, Ngawi, East Java, Indonesia
Reni Hendrarati Masduchi
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jemursari Islamic Hospital, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
Background: Stroke is the main causes of upper extremity weakness that may affect physicalindependency resulting in long-term disability. Previous studies showed that A-tDCS can improve neurological damage. A-tDCS causes depolarization and inducesbrainsynapticplasticity in strokesubjects.
Aim: To analyze the effect of Anodal-tDCS to the flexor digitorum superficialis muscles activities in stroke subjects.
Material and Methods: This experimental study was conducted from April to September 2020. Eightpatients who suffered first attack ischemic stroke, aged 40 to 70 years old, were recruited from PMR out patient clinic at Dr.Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya. Subjects were randomized in to experimental and control group. The control group was given occupational therapy for 30 minutes, while the experimental group was given A-tDCS with intensity 2 mA for 20 minutes and occupational therapy for 30 minutes in 5 consecutive days. Measurement of FDS muscle activities using sEMG were performed before and after interventionin both groups.
Results: There was an increase of FDS muscles activities after treatment incontrol group (p=0,048) while there was no similar result in treatment group (p=0,188). Thechangeofmuscles activities was notdifferent betweengroups(p=0,974).
Conclusion: tDCS provides no significant benefit in terms of muscle activities in patients with stroke. Small number of samples and other several factors might limit the significancy of current study. Further study is needed to determine the benefit of A-tDCS as a rehabilitation modality in patient with stroke.
Mursyida, A., Masduchi, R. H., & Subadi, I. (2022). Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Muscle Activities in Stroke Subjects. Surabaya Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Journal, 4(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.20473/spmrj.v4i1.25119
Ekstrand E, Lexell J, Brogårdh C. Grip strength is a representative measure of muscle weakness in the upper extremity after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23:400–5.
Hunter SM, Crome P. Hand function and stroke. Rev Clin Gerontol. 2002;12:68–81.
Hosseinzadeh SA, Mazhari S, Najafi K, Ahmadi M, Aghaei I, Niazi M, et al. Impact of anodic transcranial direct current stimulation (TCDS) on changes in movement and life–related functions in patients with chronic ischemic stroke: A clinical trial. Entomol appl sci lett. 2018;5:13–20.
Steultjens EMJ, Dekker J, Bouter LM, Van de Nes JCM, Cup EHC, Van den Ende CHM. Occupational therapy for stroke patients: a systematic review. Stroke. 2003;34:676–87.
Brunoni A, Nitsche M, Loo C. Transcranial direct current stimulation in neuropsychiatric disorders. Cham, CH Springer Int Publ. 2016;
Shaheiwola N, Zhang B, Jia J, Zhang D. Using tDCS as an add-on treatment prior to FES therapy in improving upper limb function in severe chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:233.
Fusco A, Iosa M, Venturiero V, De Angelis D, Morone G, Maglione L, et al. After vs. priming effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32:301–12.
Gomez Palacio Schjetnan A, Faraji J, Metz GA, Tatsuno M, Luczak A. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: a review of recent advancements. Stroke Res Treat. 2013;2013.
Hordacre B, Moezzi B, Ridding MC. Towards targeted brain stimulation in stroke: connectivity as a biomarker of response. J Exp Neurosci. 2018;12:1179069518809060.
Cha H-K, Ji S-G, Kim M-K, Chang J-S. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of function in patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:363–5.
Bornheim S, Thibaut A, Beaudart C, Maquet P, Croisier J-L, Kaux J-F. Evaluating the effects of tDCS in stroke patients using functional outcomes: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;1–11.
Russo C, Souza Carneiro MI, Bolognini N, Fregni F. Safety review of transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface. 2017;20:215–22.
Urbaniak GC, Plous S. Research Randomizer (Version 4.0) [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2013 Jun 22]. Available from: https://www.randomizer.org
DeLisa JA, Gans BM, Walsh NE. Physical medicine and rehabilitation: principles and practice. Vol. 1. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
Utomo A, Wulan SMM, Wardhani IL. Effect of short period simultaneous stimulation of transcranial direct current stimulation on occupational therapy to brain-derived neurotrophic factor serum in stroke patients. Syst Rev Pharm. 2020;11:979–82.
ŞIK BY, Dursun N, Dursun E, SADE I, ŞAHİN E. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: The Effects on Plegic Upper Extremity Motor Function of Patients With Stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2015;32.
Lefebvre S, Dricot L, Laloux P, Desfontaines P, Evrard F, Peeters A, et al. Increased functional connectivity one week after motor learning and tDCS in stroke patients. Neuroscience. 2017;340:424–35.
O’Brien AT, Bertolucci F, Torrealba‐Acosta G, Huerta R, Fregni F, Thibaut A. Non‐invasive brain stimulation for fine motor improvement after stroke: a meta‐analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25:1017–26.
Criswell E. Cram’s introduction to surface electromyography. Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2010.
Copyright (c) 2022 Ana Mursyida, Reni Hendrarati Masduchi, Imam Subadi