Alternative Solution on the Execution of Court’s Verdict within Employment Termination Dispute
This paper aims to analyze the juridical barriers of execution of verdict in case of dismissal dispute as well as offering a solution to the execution of such verdict to be carried out so that workers obtain their rights. Through the statute and case approaches, it is concluded that the juridical barriers are: 1) in a reminder implementation, the existing regulation does not authorize the bailiff to force the defendant to attend the reminder call if the defendant refuses to attend the call voluntarily; and 2) in the execution seizure, the goods to be confiscated shall belong to the defendant, whereas the plaintiff can not prove it because all the evidence is in the hands of the employer. While alternative solutions in order the verdict may be executed well are: 1) involving authorized third parties who may assist the worker as a plaintiff to prove the ownership of the items for which the request is for confiscation; and 2) implementing the body’s forced effort to an employer with a bad faith in accordance with Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 Year 2000, but by reducing the minimum limit of debt that is not as much as one billion rupiah due to cases of dismssal dispute are less possibility of paying for the workers’ rights who reached that amount.
Budi Santoso, Hukum Ketenagakerjaan: Perjanjian Kerja Bersama (Universitas Brawijaya Press 2012).
Harifin A. Tumpa, Memahami Eksistensi Uang Paksa (Dwangsom) Dan Implementasi Di Indonesia (Kencana Prenada Media Group 2010).
Lilik Mulyadi, Tuntutan Provisionil Dan Uang Palsa (Dwangsom) Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata (Alumni 2012).
Mohammad Saleh and Lilik Mulyadi, Seraut Wajah Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Indonesia (PT Citra Aditya Bakti 2012).
Mohd. Syaufii Syamsuddin, Hukum Acara Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industria (Sarana Bhakti Persada 2010).
Retnowulan Sutantio and Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori Dan Praktek (Mandar Maju 1997).
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (Universitas Atma Jaya 2010).
Ashgar Ali Ali Muhamed, ‘Resolution of Industrial Disputes in New Zealand’ (2012) 6 International Journal of Humanities and Social Science.
Budi Santoso, ‘Fairness in Dismissal for Business Reasons in Indonesia’ (2017) 25 Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics.
Lanny Ramli, ‘Hambatan-Hambatan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Jaminan Sosial Tenaga Kerja’ (1997) XII Yuridika.
Law Number 13 Year 2003 Concerning Manpower.
Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Year 2000 Concerning Forced Institutions.
Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 Year 1964.
Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 4 Year 1975.
Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR).
Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (RBg).
Wetboek op de Burgerlijke Rechtvordering (RV).
Supreme Court Decision Republic of Indonesia Number. 701K/Rev. Sus/2009.
Supreme Court Decision Republic of Indonesia Number. 409K/Rev. Sus/2010.
Supreme Court Decision Republic of Indonesia Number. 241K/Rev. Sus/2012.
Decision of Industrial Relations Court at Semarang District Court Number 116/G/2008/PHI.Smg.
Decision of Industrial Relations Court at Semarang District Court Number 61/G/2009/PHI.Smg.
Decision of Industrial Relations Court at Semarang District Court Number 24/G/2010/PHI.Smg.
Decision of Industrial Relations Court at Semarang District Court Number 36/G/2010/PHI.Smg.
Decision of Industrial Relations Court at Semarang District Court Number 44/G/2011/PHI.Smg.
Decision of Industrial Relations Court at Semarang District Court Number 40/G/2013/PHI.Smg.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Yuridika