Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Hubungan Internasional is a scientific journal published twice a year, every June and December. JHI invite discussions, reviews, and analysis of contemporary against four main themes: international peace and security; international political economy; international businesses and organization; as well as globalization and strategy. JHI published by Cakra Studi Global Strategis (CSGS), center of studies that examine the issues of international relations and this center of studies was under control by Airlangga University International Relations Department.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

10.1 Januari - Juni 2017

  • Annisa Pratamasari
  • Kholifatus Saadah
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

10.2 Juli-Desember 2017

  • Annisa Pratamasari
  • Kholifatus Saadah
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

11.2 Juli - Desember 2018

  • Annisa Pratamasari
  • Kholifatus Saadah
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Outline the journal's peer review policy and processes for readers and authors, including the number of reviewers typically used in reviewing a submission, the criteria by which reviewers are asked to judge submissions, typical time taken to conduct the reviews, and the principles for recruiting reviewers.


The number of reviewers typically used in reviewing a submission is at least one person.

The criteria by which reviewers are asked to judge submissions are good English, knowledgeable in international relations and global issues related to international relations issues, current active researchers, and have one or more recent publications in peer-reviewed journals.

Recommended reviewers

We may ask authors to recommend suitable reviewers on submission of their manuscript. When recommending reviewers, the following points should be considered:

-        Authors should not recommend reviewers with whom they have a conflict of interest, for example, a close collaborator or colleague.

-        Recommended reviewers should not be at the same institute as any of the authors listed on the manuscript.

-        Institutional email addresses should be provided for recommended reviewers, wherever possible.

Typical time taken to conduct the reviews is up to 2 weeks.

The principles for recruiting reviewers and the selection of reviewers for a particular manuscript is the responsibility of the Section Editors and is based on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations of authors and editors, and the Editor’s own knowledge of a reviewer’s past performance. As part of our editorial procedure, we confer with potential reviewers before sending them manuscripts to review. Reviewers should bear in mind that even these initial messages or conversations contain confidential information, which should be regarded as such.


Peer Review Process: Every manuscript submitted to Jurnal Global & Strategis is independently reviewed by at least two reviewers in the form of "double-blind review". Decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon their reports/recommendation. In certain cases, the editor may submit an article for review to another, third reviewer before making a decision, if necessary.


Criteria for Publication

To be accepted for publication in the Journal, research articles must satisfy the following criteria:

  1. The material must be not only relevant but of utility to spine surgeons, biomechanical engineers, and/or scientists involved in spine surgery research.
  2. Results reported in primary scientific research have not been published elsewhere.
  3. Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail.
  4. Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data.
  5. The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English.
  6. The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity.

The Journal’s Peer Reviewer Board, and any invited external peer reviewers, will evaluate submissions against these criteria.



The review process is strictly confidential and should be treated as such by reviewers. As the author may have chosen to exclude some people from this process, no one who is not directly involved with the manuscript (including colleagues and other experts in the field) should be consulted by the reviewer unless such consultations have first been discussed with the Section Editor. Reviewers must not take any confidential information they have gained in the review process and use it before the paper is published. Even after publication, unless they have the permission of the authors to use other information, reviewers may only use publicly published data (i.e. the contents of the published article) and not information from any earlier drafts.



Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...