Effects of strong bite force on the facial vertical dimension of pembarong performers

C. Christina, Achmad Sjafei, Ida Bagus Narmada

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v50.i2.p76-79
Abstract views = 213 times | views = 131 times

Abstract


Background: A pembarong performer is a reog dancer who bites on a piece of wood inserted into his/her mouth in order to support a 60 kg Barongan or Dadak Merak mask. The teeth supporting this large and heavy mask are directly affected, as the strong bite force exerted during a dance could affect their vertical and sagital facial dimensions. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the influence of the bite force of pembarong performers due to their vertical and sagital facial dimensions. Methods: The study reported here involved fifteen pembarong performers and thirteen individuals with normal occlusion (with specific criteria). The bite force of these subjects was measured with a dental prescale sensor during its centric occlusion. A cephalometric variation measurement was subsequently performed on all subjects with its effects on their vertical and sagital facial dimensions being measured. Results: The bite force value of the pembarong performers was 394.3816 ± 7.68787 Newtons, while the normal occlusion was 371.7784 ± 4.77791 Newtons. There was no correlation between the bite force and the facial sagital dimension of these subjects. However, a significant correlation did exist between bite force and lower facial height/total facial height (LFH/TFH) ratio (p = 0.013). Conversely, no significant correlation between bite force and posterior facial height/total facial height (PFH/TFH) ratio (p = 0.785) was detected. There was an inverse correlation between bite force and LFH/TFH ratio (r = -.464). Conclusion: Bite force is directly related to the decrease in LFH/TFH ratio. Occlusal pressure exerted by the posterior teeth on the alveolar bone may increase bone density at the endosteal surface of cortical bone.

Keywords


bite force; facial vertical dimension; pembarong

Full Text:

PDF

References


Goenharto S, Usman P. Perbedaan tinggi wajah pembarong dan bukan pembarong pada kesenian reog Ponorogo. Maj Ked Gigi (Dent J). 2003; 36(2): 42–4.

Koc D, Dogan A, Bek B. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review. Eur J Dent. 2010; 4(2): 223–32.

Bakke M. Bite force and occlusion. Semin Orthod. 2006; 12(2): 120–6.

Lemos AD, Gambareli FR, Serra MD, Pocztaruk R de L, Gavião MBD. Chewing performance and bite force in children. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2006; 5(18): 1101–8.

Thongudomporn U, Chongsuvivatwong V, Geater A. The effect of maximum bite force on alveolar bone morphology. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009; 12(1): 1–8.

Ash MM, Ramfjord S. Occlusion. 4th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1995. p. 87-8.

Salzman JA. Orthodontics in daily practice. Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1974. p. 75-6.

Braun S, Bantleon HP, Hnat WP, Freudenthaler JW, Marcotte MR, Johnson BE. A study of bite force, part 1: Relationship to various physical characteristics. Angle Orthod. 1995; 65(5): 367–72.

Nanda R, Kapila S. Current therapy in orthodontics. St Louis-Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2010. p. 227-35.

Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL. Orthodontics : current principles and techniques. Missouri: Mosby Inc; 2000. p. 663.

Bakke M, Michler L, Han K, Möller E. Clinical significance of isometric bite force versus electrical activity in temporal and masseter muscles. Scand J Dent Res. 1989; 97(6): 539–51.

Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. St Louis-Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 151.

Braun S, Bantleon HP, Hnat WP, Freudenthaler JW, Marcotte MR, Johnson BE. A study of bite force, part 2: Relationship to various cephalometric measurements. Angle Orthod. 1995; 65(5): 373–7.

Kamegai T, Tatsuki T, Nagano H, Mitsuhashi H, Kumeta J, Tatsuki Y, Kamegai T, Inaba D. A determination of bite force in northern Japanese children. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27(1): 53–7.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats