ANALISIS PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, KEBIJAKAN HUTANG, DAN UKURAN PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP TAX AGGRESSIVENESS PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA PERIODE TAHUN 2008-2010
Downloads
This research aims to prove the effect of managerial ownership, debt policy, and firm size on tax aggressiveness companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period2008-2010. The selection ofmanufacturing companyas ansubject of studyoptionsin linewiththe conclusionofthe Zimmerman research (1983). Results fromthis study is higher the ratio of managerial ownership level sindicates lower level of the taxaggressiveness but because the probability values above 0.05 so the first hypothesis is not proven. Meansthere is still adesire for profitorrent seeking. Then, higher the proportion of debt indicatesdecrease in aggressive tax policy but because the probability values above 0.05 so the second hypothesis is not proven. It means that the addition of the proportion of debt is not always negative connotations to reduce the company's profit before tax. Yet the participation of creditors to monitor the performance of the debtor company participates in helping reduce the level of tax aggressiveness. Next, bigger the company indicates less aggressive in taxation policy and the relationship is proven because the probability value below 0.05. This condition occurs as a part of company's political cost policy that tends to avoid tax audit.
Allingham, M. G. dan A. Sandmo. 1972. 'Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis', Journal of Public Economics 1, 323”338
Barbie, Earl. 1986. The relationship between ownership and Firm Performance:A Signaling Model.
International Economic Review, Vol 39
Bathala, C.T. Kenneth P. Moon, dan Ramesh P Rao. 1994. Managerial ownership, debt policy and the impact of institutional Holdings : An Agency Perspective. Financial Management Journal, Vol.23
Baysinger, Barry D. dan Henry N. Butler. 1985.Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization,Vol.1 No.1 (Spring,1985), pp.101-124
Besley, S., dan E.F. Brigham. 2007. Essentials of managerial finance. US: South-Western Pub.
Bujaki, M.L. dan A.J. Richarson. 1997. A Citation Trail Review of The Uses of Firm Size in Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol.16, pp 1-27
Chen, C.R. dan T.L. Steiner. 1999.Managerial ownership and agency conflict : a non linier simultaneous equation model. Journal of economic and business. Vol.52
Chen, Shuping, Xia Chen, Qiang Cheng, dan Terry Shevlin. 2010. Are family firm more aggressive than non family firm ? Journal of Financial Economic. Vol 95
Crutchley, Claire E. Marlin, R.H. Jensen, John S. Jahera,Jr, Jennie E. Raymond. 1999. Agency Problems and The Simultaneously of Financial Decision Making: The Role of Institutional Ownership, International Review of Financial Analysis, 8:2, pp 177-197
Crutchley,C.E. dan R.S. Hansen. 1989. A Test of The Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage and Corporate Dividends. Financial Management, pp. 36-46
De Angelo, H. dan R.W. Masulis. 1980. Optimal Capital Structure Under Corporate and Personal Taxation.
The Journal of Finance Economics Vol. 8: pp. 3-29
Demsetz, H. (1983). "Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm”, The. JL & Econ. 26: 375
Desai, Mihir A. dan Dhammika Dharmapala. 2006. Corporate Tax Avoidance and High Powered Incentives.
Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 84, pp 591-623
Desai, Mihir A. dan Dhammika Dharmapala. 2007. Taxation and Corporate Governance: An Economic Approach.http://www.intrweb.org/londonmet/ library/t77539_3.pdf
Direktorat Jendral Pajak RI. 2009. SE-96/PJ/2009 tentang rasio total benchmarking dan petunjuk pelaksanaannya Emery, D.R. dan J.D. Finnerty. 1997. Corporate Financial Management, International Edition. US: Prentice Hall Inc
Frank, M.,L. Lynch,dan S. Rego. 2008. Tax Reporting Aggressiveness and Its Relation to Aggressive Financial Reporting.The Accounting Review, Vol. 84, pp 467-496
Grossman J. Stanford dan Oliver D. Hart. 1983. Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem and Theory of The Corporation, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol.11, No.1, pp 42-64
Gujarati, D. N., dan D.C. Porter. (1992). Essentials of econometrics: McGraw-Hill New York.
Hanlon, Michelle. 2005. The Persistence and Pricing of Earnings, Accruals and Cash Flows When Firms Have Large Book-Tax Differences. The Accounting Review.Vol.80, No.1. 2005.pp. 137-166
Harnanto. 2010. Akuntansi Perpajakan. Yogyakarta : BPFE Yogyakarta Hermawan, Asep. 2006. Penelitian Bisnis Paradigma Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Grasindo
Hite, P.A. dan GA. McGill. 1992. An Examination of Tax Payer Preference for Aggresive Tax Advice. National Tax Journal (1986-1998), 45-4
Jensen, Gerald R., Donald P. Solberg dan Thomas S. Zorn. 1992. Simultaneous Determinant of Insider Ownership, Debt and Dividend Policies. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.27, pp.247-261
Jensen, M. 1986. Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Rakeover, American Economic Review, Vol.76, pp.323-329
Jensen, M.C. dan William H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Stucture. Journal of Financial Economics, pp.305-360
Jimenez-Angueira, C. E. 2008. Tax aggressiveness, tax environment changes, and corporate governance, University of Florida
Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 193: 210-212.
Kieso, Donald E.,et all. 2001. Intermediate Accounting 10th edition. US : John Willey & Sons,Inc.
Lisowsky, Petro. 2010. Seeking Shelter:Empirically Modeling Tax Shelters Using Financial Statement Information. The Accounting Review Vol. 85,No.5, pp.1693-1720
Lombantoruan, Sophar. 2005. Akuntansi Pajak. Jakarta : PT Gramedia
Main, B. G., C.A. O'Reilly, dan J. Wade. 1995. The CEO, the board of directors and executive compensation: Economic and psychological perspectives. Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press 4(2), 293-332.
Miller, M.H. dan F. Modigliani. 1958. The cost of capital, corporate finance and theory of investment. American Economic Review. Vol 158
Moh'd Mahmoud A, Larry G. Perry dan James N. Rimbey. 1995. An Investigation of Dynamic Relationship Between Agency Theory and Dividend Policy. The Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol.20, pp.439-454
Moh'd Mahmoud A, Larry G. Perry dan James N. Rimbey. 1998. The Impact of Ownership Structure Debt Policy: A Time Series Cross-Sectional Analysis, The Financial Review, Vol.33, pp 85-98
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, dan R.W. Vishny. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of financial economics, 20, 293-315.
Murphy, K. 2004. Aggresive Tax Planning: Differentiating Those Playing The Game From Those Who Don't.
Journal of Economic Psychology, 25,pp.307-329
Republik Indonesia. 1995. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal Republik Indonesia. 2008. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 sebagaimana telah
diubah terakhir dengan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 tentang Pajak
Penghasilan
Republik Indonesia. 2009. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir dengan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2009 tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan
Resmi, Siti. 2011. Perpajakan: Teori dan Kasus Edisi 6. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
Richardson, G. dan R. Lanis. 2007. Determinants of The Variability in Corporate Effective Tax Rates and Tax Reform:Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26 (2007), 689-704
Santoso, Singgih. 1999. SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions). Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo
Sari, Dewi Kartika dan Dwi Martani. 2010. Ownership Characteristics, Corporate Governance and Tax Aggressiveness, Tax03. The 3rd Accounting Conference and The 2nd Doctoral Colloquium Faculty of Economics Universitas Indonesia
Schroeder, Mary S., Ira Solomon dan Don Vickrey.1986. Audit Quality: The Perceptions of Audit Committee Chairpersons and Audit Partners. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol.5 No.2 Spring 1986
Siegfried, J.J. 1974. Effective Average US Corporation Income Tax Rates. National Tax Journal. 27, pp. 245-259 Sloan, R. G. 1996. Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows About Future
Earnings? Accounting Review. Vol.71 No.3 1996, pp. 289-315
Stickney, C.P. dan R.B. Tower, Jr. 1978. Effective Income Tax Rates of Petroleum Companies, Oil and Gas Quarterly, June 445-456
Sugiyono, 2001. Metode Penelitian Bisnis, Bandung: Penerbit CV Alfabeta
Tandelilin, E dan T. Wilberforce. 2002. Can Debt and Dividend Policies Substitute Insider Ownership in Controlling Equity Agency Conflict ? Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, January, Vol.1, No.1 : pp.31-43
Trejo-Pech, Carlos Omar, Richard Weldon, Lisa House dan Tomas Salas Gutierrez. 2006. Accruals,Free Cash Flows and EBITDA for Agribusiness. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California, July 23-26,2006
Von Neumann, J. dan O. Morgenstern. 2007. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Commemorative Edition), US: Princeton university press
Wilberforce, T. 2000. Substitability of Agency Conflict Control Mechanism : A Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Insider Ownership, Debt and Dividend Policy. Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Zhou, Haoyong. 2012. Are Family Firms Better Performers during Financial Crisis? http://ssrn.com/=1990250 Zimmerman, J.L. 1983. Taxes and Firm Size. Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol.5 pp. 119-149
The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga (JEBA) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License