THE EFFECT OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CHARACTERISTICS ON GOVERNMENT APPARATUS PERFORMANCE
Downloads
The decline or low public confidence in government institutions is a fundamental problem in Indonesia as well as in developed countries. The decline of trust occurred among others due to the rampant corruption cases conducted by public officials and non-conformity of services provided to the expectations of the community. To overcome this it is necessary to make efforts by the government to restore public confidence in government institutions. Implementation of performance management system can be one of the efforts to improve the performance of the apparatus and restore public confidence in government institutions. An effective performance management system should be supported by the characteristics of a good performance management system. This study focuses on the characteristics of performance management system activities and structure of performance management systems. This research uses explanatory quantitative method with sample of 116 employees who work in the Agency of Financial and Development Supervision. The results of the analysis show that the performance management system activities and structure of performance management systems have a significant and positive effect on the performance of the apparatus.
Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., R, & Delbridge. (2009). Escape From The Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
Bacal, R. (2001). Performance Management. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
DeNisi, A. S. (2000). Performance Appraisal and Performance Management. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collevtive Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review.
Greve, H. R. (2010). Positional Rigidity: Low Performance and Resource Acquisition in Large and Small Firms. Strategic Management Journal.
Hidayati, I. (2014). Analisis Penerapan Sistem Manajemen Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis.
Kim, S. (2005). Individual-Level Factors and Organizational Performance in Government Organization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 245-261.
Kinicki, A., & Kreitner, R. (2004). Organizational Behavior Sixth Edition. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Kinicki, A., & Kreitner, R. (2013). Organizational Behavior Tenth Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology.
Ricci, L. (2016). The Impact of Performance Management System Characteristics on Perceived Effectiveness of the System and Engagement.
Roberts, I. (2001). Reward and Performance Management. Edinburgh: Pearson.
Ruky, A. S. (2006). Sistem Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Sedarmayanti. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Silalahi, U. (2011). Kepercayaan Publik kepada Pemerintah Orde Baru. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara Volume 11 Nomor 2, 167-179.
Authors who publish with Berkala Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia agree to the following terms:
The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY NC SA)
BAKI (Berkala Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
