Studi Fenomenologi: Pengalaman Friends with Benefits pada Pengguna Tinder
Downloads
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengalaman hubungan friends with benefits para pengguna Tinder. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan fenomenologi. Teknik penggalian data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah wawancara mendalam kepada partisipan yang pernah menjalani hubungan friends with benefits dan pengguna Tinder. Partisipan pada penelitian ini berjumlah dua orang. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) dengan tahapan penyusunan transkrip wawancara, pencatatan awal, merumuskan tema emergen, merumuskan tema superordinat, membuat pola pengalaman antarpartisipan dan melaporkan hasil. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa: a) proses pencarian pasangan FWB melalui Tinder melibatkan kesan khas yaitu kesan sensual meskipun diwujudkan dengan pengalaman unik masing-masing partisipan. b) pemaknaan hubungan FWB bermacam-macam, yaitu hubungan untuk having fun, teman tapi mesra, dan pemuas kebutuhan seksual. c) pemaknaan pasangan friends with benefits sebagai teman dan sex partner. Meskipun setiap partisipan memaknai hubungan FWB-nya secara berbeda, satu-satunya poin kesepakatannya adalah aktivitas seksual.
Ardaningtyas, N. (2020). Lima Aplikasi Kencan Online Pilihan. Antara News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/1735661/lima-aplikasi-kencan-online-pilihan
Bisson, M. A., & Levine, T. R. (2009). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9211-2
Cooper, A., Morahan-Martin, J., Mathy, R. M., & Maheu, M. (2002). Toward an increased understanding of user demographics in online sexual activities. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28(2), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230252851861
Couch, D., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Online dating and mating: The use of the internet to meet sexual partners. Qualitative Health Research, 18(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307312832
Daneback, K., Månsson, S. A., & Ross, M. W. (2007). Using the Internet to find offline sex partners. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9986
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
Emery, L. R. (2016). Is Tinder Actually Good For Modern Relationships? Bustle. https://www.bustle.com/articles/186819-tinder-isnt-bad-for-modern-relationships-study-says-so-lets-all-calm-down
Fromm, E. (1956). The Art of Loving.
Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, K. J. K. (2005). What's love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310500034154
Kresna, M. (2017). Aplikasi Kencan: Cari Jodoh atau Teman Bobo? https://tirto.id/aplikasi-kencan-cari-jodoh-atau-teman-bobo-ctrR
Lehmiller, J. J., Vanderdrift, L. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2011). Sex differences in approaching friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48(2–3), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224491003721694
Levine, T. R., & Mongeau, P. A. (2010). Friends with benefits. In Print and Promo (Vol. 58, Issue 5, pp. 38–40).
Matua, G. A., & Van Der Wal, D. M. (2015). Differentiating between descriptive and interpretive phenomenological research approaches. Nurse Researcher, 22(6), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.6.22.e1344
Mongeau, P. A., Knight, K., Williams, J., Eden, J., & Shaw, C. (2013). Identifying and explicating variation among friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 50(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.623797
Nugrahani, F. (2014). dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. 信阳师范å¦é™¢, 1(1), 305. http://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT%0Ahttp://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/viewFile/11345/10753%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.758%0Awww.iosrjournals.org
Raco, J. R., & Tanod, R. R. H. M. (2012). Metode Fenomenologi Entrepreneurship Aplikasi pada EnterPreneureship. 210.
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. https://doi.org/10.3115/1667583.1667616
Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults' motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009
Tankovska, H. (2021). Most Popular Online Dating Apps in the United States as of September 2019, by Audience Size. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/826778/most-popular-dating-apps-by-audience-size-usa/
Tinder. (n.d.). A Guide to Tinder. https://www.help.tinder.com/hc/en-us/categories/115000755686-A-Guide-To-Tinder-
Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1023–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208318067
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction.
Wentland, J. J., & Reissing, E. (2014). Casual sexual relationships: Identifying definitions for one night stands, booty calls, fuck buddies, and friends with benefits. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(3), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2744
Wentland, J. J., & Reissing, E. D. (2011). Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sexual relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20(3), 75–91.
BRPKM is a periodical publication with open access to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Therfore, the copyright remains with the author.
With this license, anyone has the right to use the information and to re-distribute the content contained in this journal for any purpose, including commercial purposes. It can be done as long as it fulfills two conditions, namely; (1) you shall provide attribution by citing the original link source, and state if any changes have been made; and (2) you may not use any legal provisions or technological means of control that can legally restrict others from doing the things that are permitted by this license.
Journal editors will not ask the author to approve the transfer of copyright on all published manuscripts.
