Daya bunuh dan daya hambat antimikrobial chlorhexidine 2% dan povidone iodine 1% sebagai medikamen saluran akar terhadap Enterococcus faecalis The ability of chlorhexidine 2% and povidone iodine 1% as root canal medicaments to kill and inhibit Enterococcus faecalis
Downloads
Background. Enterococcus faecalis is one of the pathogenic organisms associated with root canal treatment failure and apical periodontitis. Root canal medicament is needed to prevent re-infection in the root canal and increase the success of treatment. Chlorhexidine and povidone iodine is a broad spectrum root canal medicaments that can kill gram-positive bacteria. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to discover the ability to kill and inhibit of antimicrobial chlorhexidine 2% and 1% povidone iodine asvroot canal medicaments against bacteria Enterococcus faecalis. Methode. This research was done by measuring the inhibition zone and count the number of colonies. Determination of the inhibition of root canal medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis by diffusion method. 10 microliter root canal medicaments dropped on paperdisk and placed on nutrient agar media with enterococcus faecalis, then inhibition zone was calculated. Determination ability to kill enterococcus faecalis is done by inserting 1 ml medicaments root canal into 5 ml BHIB media, then 0.05 ml inoculum of Enterococcus faecalis inserted into each tube, except the negative control. 0.1 ml of each tube implanted in the media nutrient agar. Media incubated for 24 hours, then Enterococcus faecalis bacterial colonies that grow in media calculated using the CFU. Results. There no colony growth of enterococcus faecalis in both root canal medicaments. There are significant differences in inhibition zone of 2% chlorhexidine and 1% povidone iodine (p<0.05). Conclusion. Both of root canal medicaments can kill enterococcus faecalis, but chlorhexidine 2% was more capable inhibit Enterococcus faecalis.
Cohen S, Hargreaves K.M. Pathways of the Pulp. Edisi 9. Elsevier; 2006. h. 16
Attia D.A., Farah A.M., Afifi I.K., Darag A.M. Antimicrobial effect of different intracanal medications on various microorganisms. Tanta Dental Journal 2015; 12 (1): 41-47.
Tarigan R. Perawatan Pulpa Gigi (Endodonti). Edisi 9. Jakarta: EGC;2006. h. 105,111, 127-128
Shahani M N & Reddy S. Comparison of antimicrobial substantivity of root canal Irrigants in instrumented root canals up to 72 h: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011. 29 (1); 28-33.
Bartanovsky E, Keinan D, Moshonov J, & Solomonov M. The effect of iodine-containing materials on the bonding strength of AH 26®. Endodontic practice 2011. 29 (1).
Kandaswamy D. & Venkateshbabu N. (2010). Root canal irrigants. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2010. 13 (4); 256-264.
María T.Arias., Carmen M., Rodríguez M.P., Escobar E, Márcia F.A., & Baca P. Antimicrobial activity and enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on chlorhexidine varnishes. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Cirugia Bucal 2012. 17 (4); 705-709.
Ferraz C.C.R., Gomes B. P. S. A., Zaia A.A., Teixeira F.B., Souza-Filho F. J. Comparative Study of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chlorhexidine Gel, Chlorhexidine Solution and Sodium Hypochlorite as Endodontic Irrigants. Braz Dent J 2007. 18 (4); 294-298
Kapsar et al. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. The toxic effect of different concentrations of povidone iodine on the rabbit's corne 2006. 28 (3); 119-124.
Kumar S., Babu R.P., Jagadish R.G., Uttam A. (2011). Povidone Iodine-Revisited. Indian Journal of Dental Advancements. 3 (3).
Wang Q., Zhang C., Chu C., & Zhu X. (2012). Prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis in saliva and filled root canals of teeth associated with apical periodontitis. International Journal of Oral Science. 4 (1), p19-23.
Stuart C.H., Schwartz S.A., Beeson T.J., & Christopher B. Owatz C.B. (2006). Enterococcus faecalis: Its Role in Root Canal Treatment Failure and Current Concepts in Retreatment. JOE. 32 (2), p93.
Dammaschke T., Jung N., Harks I., & Schafer E. (2013). The effect of different root canal medicaments on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis ex vivo. European Journal of Denstistry. 7 (4), p442-448.
Hegde V (2005). Enterococcus faecalis: clinical significance and treatment considerations. Endodontology. 21(2), p48-54
Bhardwaj SB. (2013). Role of Enterococci faecalis in failure of Endodontic treatment. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 2 (8), p272-277.
Murad et al. (2012). Antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite, povidone iodine, chlorhexidine and MTAD® against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm on human dentin matrix in vitro. RSBO. 9 (2), p143-150.
Kenaway, El-Refaie; S. D. Worley; Roy Broughton (May 2007). "The Chemistry and Applications of Antimicrobial Polymers: A State of the Art Review". BioMacromolecules (American Chemical Society) 8 (5), p1359–1384.
Bathla Shalu. Periodontics Revisited. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2011. h. 284
Hibbard J. Analysis comparing the antimicrobial activity and safety of current antiseptics: a review. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2005. 28(3); 194-207.
Mohammadi, Z. & P. V. Abbott. The Properties and Applications of chlorhexidine in Endodontics. International Endodontic Journal 2009. 42(4); 288- 302.
CDJ by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions