TENSILE STRENGTH OF BONDING MATERIAL TO DENTINE USING WATER-WET AND ETHANOL-WET TECHNIQUES
Downloads
Background: Composite resins have hydrophobic properties so it cannot attach to dentine. Moist dentin is a normal condition caused by the presence of fluid in dentinal tubules. Therefore bonding material is required to bond dentine with composite. Water-wet technique is a technique in which dentine surface is rinsed after etching by using water and allowing it to be moist and prevent the collapse of dentine collagen fibrils. This technique is commonly used today, but excess water disturbs the effectiveness of dentine and bonding material attachment. Ethanol-wet technique is a technique in which ethanol is used to replace water before bonding to reduce excess water in dentine surface. This technique will initiate monomer penetration into interfibrillar space of dentine. It will affect the result of tensile strength test. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare tensile strength of bonding material to dentine using water-wet and ethanol-wet techniques. Method: 12 samples of bovine incisors teeth were randomly divided into 2 group. Each group consists of six samples. Group 1 was treated with water-wet technique and group 2 was treated with ethanol-wet technique. Autograph was used as a tensile strength test instrument. Result : The average of tensile strength using water-wet technique was 2,16067 MPa and ethanol-wet technique was 4,21900 MPa. Conclusion: Ethanol-wet technique have higher value of tensile strength than water-wet technique.
Gupta S, Kaur G, Biswal SS, Kaushik SV, Karami S, Goyal S, Singh S. 2014. Dentin Bonding Agents: An Overview. J Adv Med Dent Science. 2(1): pp. 82-84.
Anusavice, KJ. 2003. Philip's Science of Dental Material 11th Ed. USA:WB Elsevier, Saunders Company. pp. 21,24,79,251- 9,227 – 32.
Heymann, Herald O et al. 2013. Art and Sciences of Operative Dentistry Sixth Edition. Canada : Elsevier
Nagpal R, Manuja N,Pandit IK. 2015. Effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on the durability of resin dentin bond with contemporary adhesive systems. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 39 (2): pp. 133-142.
Adioro, S. 2013. Penggunaan Resin Komposit dalam Bidang Konservasi Gigi. Surabaya: PT. Revka Petra Media. pp. 17-18, 45, 57, 104-6.
Attathom, T. 2009. Effect of Ethanol Wet-Bonding to Caries Affected Dentin. thesis, University of Iowa. pp. 19-28.
Shin TP, Yao X, Huenergardt R, Walker MP, Wang Y. 2009. Morphological and chemical characterization of bonding hydrophobic adhesive to dentin using ethanol wet bonding technique. Dent Mater;25: pp. 1050"‘7.
Subramani K & Ahmed W & Hartsfield J K. 2013. Nanobiomaterilas in Clini,;;cal Dentistry. USA : Elsevier: p. 153.
Pashley, D. H.; Tay, F. R.; Carvalho, R. M.; Rueggeberg, F. A.; Agee, K. A.; Carrilho, M.; Donnelly, A. & Garc.a-Godoy, F. 2007. From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. Am. J. Dent., 20(1): pp. 7-20.
Ayar, Muhammet Kerim. 2016. A review of ethanol wet-bonding: Principles and techniques. Eur J Dent (10): pp. 155-9.
Mangonon. P.L. 1999. The Principles of materials Selection for Engineering Design. Printice-Hall International,Inc. Hal- 29 -81. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Materials 9thed, UK:Blackwell. pp. 225-9.
Christensen. 2006. Has the total etch concept disspeared. American Dental Association J. 137(6): p. 817
Tulunoglu O, Tulunoglu I. 2008. Resin-dentin interfacial morphology and shear bond strengths to primary dentin after long-term water storage: An in vitro study. Quintessence International; 39(5): pp. 427-37.
CDJ by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions