The Difference of Antibacterial Power between Cocoa Peel (Theobroma Cacao L.) Extract 6% compared to Chlorhexidine Digluconate 2% Againts Streptococcus mutans (In vitro)
Downloads
Background: Before restoration, it is necessary to clean the cavity from the smear layer and residual bacteria such as Sreptococcus mutans using a 'gold standard' cavity cleanser, namely 2% Chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX), however CHX 2% has a disadvantage of having a toxic effect on fibroblasts, osteoblasts, myoblasts, odontoblast-like cells, Chinese hamster ovary cells, and buccal epithelial cells. The shortcomings of the 2% CHX triggered researchers to look for alternative cavity cleansers that are more biocompatible, namely cocoa peel extract because it contains of antibacterial compounds including alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, saponins, and terponoids with a non-toxic 6% concentration. Purpose: To analyze the difference of antibacterial activity between cocoa peel extract with a concentration of 6% compared to chlorhexidine digluconate 2% against Streptococcus mutans. Methods: This research was an in vitro laboratory experimental study with the posttest only control group design which included two treatment groups, namely 6% cocoa peel extract and 2% CHX. This research was conducted using the inhibition zone diffusion method against S. mutans to see the antibacterial power of each sample. Results: There was a significant difference (p <0.05) in the mean diameter of the inhibition zone between 6% cacao peel extract, namely 11.5406 mm and CHX 2%, namely 13.2156 mm. Conclusion: Chlorhexidine digluconate 2% has a greater antibacterial power than 6% cocoa peel extract (Theobroma cacao L.) against Streptococcus mutans.
Irmaleny, I., Hidayat, O. T., & Sulistianingsih, S. The remineralization potential of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) bean extract to increase the enamel micro hardness (IN PRESS). Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry. 2017;29(2):107–112.
Yadav, K., & Prakash, S. A Review of Dental Caries. Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016; 73–80.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2017. Sugars and Dental Caries. Geneva : WHO.
Yadav, K., Prakash, S. Dental caries : A Microbiological Approach. Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases & Practice. 2017;2(1):2-15.
Novita, W. Uji Aktivitas Antibakteri Fraksi Daun Sirih (Piper Betle L) Terhadap Pertumbuhan Bakteri Streptococcus Mutans Secara In Vitro. JMJ. 2016; 4(2):140-155.
Bin-Shuwaish, M. S. Effects and effectiveness of cavity disinfectants in operative dentistry: A literature review. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2016; 17(10):867–879.
Kusdemir, M., Çetin, A., Özsoy, A., Toz, T., Öztürk Bozkurt, F. and Özcan, M. Does 2% chlorhexidine digluconate cavity disinfectant or sodium fluoride/hydroxyethyl methacrylate affect adhesion of universal adhesive to dentin?. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2015; 30(1):13-23.
Kaur, G., Singh, A., Patil, K.P., Gopalakrishnan, D., Nayyar, A.S., Deshmukh, S. Chlorhexidine: First To Be Known, Still A Gold Standard Anti-Plaque Agent. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Science. 2015; 6(4):1407-24
Wulandari, N. M., Prasetyo, E. A., Subiwahjudi, A., & Yuanita, T. The Difference Of Antibacterial Power Between Cocoa Peel ( Theobroma cacao L .) Extract 6 , 25 % and Chlorhexidine. 2018; 9(1):40–47.
Liu, J. X., Werner, J., Kirsch, T., Zuckerman, J. D., & Virk, M. S. Cytotoxicity evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate on human fibroblasts, myoblasts, and osteoblasts. Journal of Bone and Joint Infection. 2018; 3(4):165–172.
Lessa, F., Aranha, A., Nogueira, I., Giro, E., Hebling, J. And Costa, C. Toxicity of chlorhexidine on odontoblast-like cells. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010; 18(1):50-8.
Yi-Ching Li, Yu-Hsiang Kuan, Tzu-Hsin Lee, Fu-Mei Huang, Chao Chang. Assessment of the cytotoxicity of chlorhexidine by employing an in vitro mammalian test system. Journal Of Dental Science. 2014; 9(2): 130-5.
Durbakula, K., Prabhu, V. and Jose, M. Genotoxicity of non-alcoholic mouth rinses: A micronucleus and nuclear abnormalities study with fluorescent microscopy. J Invest Clin Dent. 2017; 1:3-7
Laksmono, R., & Sasongko, E. P. Extraction of pectin from peel waste. Academic Research International. 2018; 9:1–7.
Panak Balentić, J., AÄkar, Ä., Jokić, S., Jozinović, A., Babić, J., MiliÄević, B., Å ubarić, D., & Pavlović, N. Cocoa Shell: A By-Product with Great Potential for Wide Application. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2018; 23(6):1–14.
Rachmawaty, Mu'nisa, A. and Hasri. Analisis Fitokimia Ekstrak Kulit Buah Kakao (Theobroma cacao L.) Sebagai Kandidat Antimikroba. Identifikasi Senyawa Aktif Ekstrak Kulit Buah Kakao sebagai Kandidiat Fungsida Nabati. 2017; 1:667-70.
Budaraga, I.K. Putra, D.P. Liquid Smoke Antimicobial Test of Cocoa Fruit Peel Against Eschericia coli and Staphylococcus aureus Bacteria. Earth and Enviromental Science. 2019; 365:1-10
Fitriani, F. Subiwahjudi, A. Soetojo, A. Yuanita, T. Sitotoksisitas Ekstrak Kulit kakao (Theobroma cacao) terhadap Kultur Sel Fibroblas BHK-21. Conservative Dentistry Journal. 2019; 9(1):54-65
Egra, S., Mardhiana, Rofin., M., Adiwena, M., Jannah, N., Kuspradini, H., Mutsunaga, T. Aktivitas Antimikroba Ekstrak Bakau (Rhizophora mucronata) dalam Menghambat Pertumbuhan Ralstonia Solanacearum Penyebab Penyakit Layu. AGROVIGOR. 2019; 12(1):26-31
Samaranayake, L. Essential Microbiology For Dentistry. 4th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier. 2017; 7-10.
Yumas, M. Pemanfaatan Limbah Kulit Ari Biji Kakao (Theobroma Cacao L) Sebagai Sumber Antibakteri Streptococcus mutans. Jurnal Industri hasil Perkebunan. 2017; 12(2):7-20.
Mulyatni, A. Budiani, A. Taniwiryono, D. Aktivitas Antibakteri Ekstrak Kulit Buah Kakao (Theobroma cacao L.) terhadap Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, dan Staphylococcus aureus. Menara Perkebunan. 2012; 80(2):77-84
Rahman, F.A., Haniastuti, T., Utami, T.W. Skrining Fitokimia dan Aktivitas Antibakteri Ekstrak Etanol Daun Sirsak (Annona muricata L.) pada Streptococcus mutans ATCC 35668. Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia. 2017; 3(1):1-7.
Armedita, D., Asfrizal, V., Amir, M. Aktivitas Antibakteri Ekstrak Etanol Daun, Kulit Batang, dan Getah Angsana (Pterocarpus Indicus Willd) terhadap Pertumbuhan Streptococcus mutans. ODONTO Dental Journal. 2018; 5(1):1-8.
Bontjura, S., Waworuntu, O.A., Siagian, K.V. Uji Efek Antibakteri Ekstrak Daun Lelem (Clerodendrum minahase L.) terhadap Bakteri Streptococcus mutans. Jurnal Ilmiah Farnasi-UNSRAT. 2015; 4(4):96-101.
Cieplik, F. jakubovics, N.S. Buchalla, W. Maisch, T. Hellwig, E. Al-Ahmad, A. Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019; 10(587):1-11
Jamili, M.A., Hidayat, M.N., Hifizah, A. Uji Daya Hambat Ramuan Herbal Terhadap Pertumbuhan Staphylococcus aureus dan Salmonella thypi. JIIP. 2015; 1(3):227-39
Susanto, D., Sudrajat, Ruga, R. Studi Kandungan Bahan Aktif Tumbuhan Meranti merah (Shorea leprosula Miq) sebagai sumber senyawa antibakteri. Mulawarman Scientifie. 2012; 11(2):181-90.
Sofiani, E., Mareta, D.A. Perbedaan Daya Antibakteri antara Klorheksidin Diglukonat 2% dan Ekstrak Daun Jambu Biji (Psidium Guajava Linn) Berbagai Konsentrasi (Tinjauan Terhadap Enterococcus Faecalis). IDJ. 2015; 3(1):30-41
Hafidhah, N., Hakim, R.F., Fakhrurrazi. Pengaruh Ekstrak Biji Kakao (Theobroma cacao L.) Terhadap Pertumbuhan Enterococcus faecalis Pada Berbagai Konsentrasi. Journal Caninus Dentistry. 2017; 2(2):92-96
CDJ by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
