Perilaku menyimpang masyarakat penjudi merpati di Surabaya
Downloads
Judi merpati adalah judi dengan sarana burung yang dilombakan untuk mengadu kecepatan terbang merpati hingga sampai di garis finish yang telah dipersiapkan dan ditentukan oleh panitia "adu doro” (adu merpati). Di Surabaya kegiatan "adu doro” masih sering terlihat eksistensinya. Walaupun Surabaya termasuk kota besar, akan tetapi kegiatan "adu merpati” hanya dilakukan pada waktu tertentu yaitu hari Minggu atau hari libur. Burung merpati sebelum mengikuti lomba harus dilatih terlebih dahulu, latihannya dilakukan setiap sore hari agar "merpati” nya bisa lebih peka daya jelajahnya. Studi ini menggunakan metode kualitatif. Teori yang digunakan untuk menganalisis perjudian merpati yaitu teori asosiasi diferensial Edwin H Shuterland. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Kelurahan Banyu Urip Surabaya. Metode yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data yaitu menggunakan wawancara mendalam (Indepth interview) dengan informan penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa perilaku menyimpang masyarakat penjudi merpati di Banyu Urip Surabaya, menjelaskan di satu sisi adanya judi merpati dianggap sebagai suatu hal yang biasa, karena masyarakat melihat judi merpati sebagai sebuah hiburan. Namun di sisi lain masyarakat menganggap judi merpati sebagai suatu permasalahan sendiri, karena mengganggu ketertiban dan kenyamanan di daerah sekitar adu merpati dilakukan.
Aasved M (2003) The Sociology of Gambling: Volume II. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
Beckert J, Lutter M (2013) Why the poor play the lottery: Sociological approaches to explaining class-based lottery play. Sociology 47 (6):1152–1170.
Binde P (2013) Why people gamble: a model with five motivational dimensions. International Gambling Studies 13 (1):81–97. doi:10.1080/14459795.2012.712150
Binde P, Romild U, Volberg RA (2017) Forms of gambling, gambling involvement and problem gambling: evidence from a Swedish population survey. International Gambling Studies 17 (3):490–507. doi:10.1080/14459795.2017.1360928
Cheung NW (2016) Social strain, self-control, and juvenile gambling pathology: Evidence from Chinese adolescents. Youth & Society 48 (1):77-100.
Clark JP (1962) Socio-economic class and area as correlates of illegal behavior among juveniles. American Sociological Review 27 (6):826-834.
Cohen AK (2018) The Sociology of the Deviant Act: Anomie Theory. In Deviance and Liberty (pp. 44-53). Routledge.
Curnow J (2012) Gambling in Flores, Indonesia: Not such risky business. The Australian Journal of Anthropology 23 (1):101-116.
Goode E (2015) Deviant Behavior. Routledge.
Kartono K (2011) Patologi Sosial Jilid I. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada Media.
Kristiansen S & Trabjerg CM (2017) Legal gambling availability and youth gambling behaviour: A qualitative longitudinal study. International Journal of Social Welfare 26 (3):218-229.
LaPlante DA (2009) Sitting at the Virtual Poker Table: A Prospective Epidemiological Study of Actual Internet Poker Gambling Behavior, 25 Computers in Human Behavior 729.
Malizia N (2018) Boredom and social deviant behavior: An empirical study. Advances in Applied Sociology 8 (02):174.
Mulyana D (2005) Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Remaja Rosda karya.
Nicoll FJ (2019) Gambling in Everyday Life: Spaces, Moments and Products of Enjoyment. Routledge.
Nooteboom G (2015) Living dangerously: Oplosan, gambling, and competition as everyday risk taking in Java and East Kalimantan Indonesia. Disaster Prevention and Management 24(4):523-538.
Narwoko DJ & Suyanto B (2010) Sosiologi: Teks Pengantar dan Terapan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Rocheleau GC, Dennison CR, Finkeldey JG, Reiber MF (2020) Social class differences in the relationships between problem gambling and deviant behavior. Criminal Justice Studies, 1-20.
Sallaz JJ (2008) Deep plays: A comparative ethnography of gambling contests in two post-colonies. Ethnography 9 (1):5-33.
Simanjuntak B (1981) Pengantar Kriminologi dan Patologi. Bandung: Tasrito. Budi T (2011) Sosiologi: Perilaku Menyimpang. Surabaya: PT. Revka Petra.
Widiatedja IGNP (2018) Can Indonesia invoke public morals exception under the World Trade Organization (WTO) for prohibiting cross-border gambling? Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 7 (2):261-279.
1. Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of author, whilst the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
2. Legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
3. Every publications (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other that the aims mentioned above, editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.