The Era of Society 5.0 as the unification of humans and technology: A literature review on materialism and existentialism

Melinda Rahmawati; Ahmad Ruslan; Desvian Bandarsyah

doi:10.20473/jsd.v16i2.2021.151-162

Authors

Melinda Rahmawati
melinda.rahmawati7@gmail.com
History Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Prof. Dr. Hamka
Ahmad Ruslan History Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Prof. Dr. Hamka
Desvian Bandarsyah History Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Prof. Dr. Hamka

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika

Articles

September 7, 2021

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Author Biographies
Metrics
References
License

The Industrial Revolution 4.0 brings society in fast-paced change. Technology and social media emerge not only as a means of communication and accessibility of modern society, but also as a means of mass news spread and provocation. When society and technology coexist, technology is able to drive people to have accessibility without time limits. The objective of this study is to describe the overview of the Era of Society 5.0 seen from the perspectives of materialism and existentialism in social sciences. The research method used was descriptive qualitative with literature review analysis which specifically discussed modern society and the idea of materialism and existentialism. The results of this study showed that the Era of Society 5.0 has indeed become an era of the unification of humans and technology. Technology has become a necessity that must be fulfilled by all people. The perspectives of materialism and existentialism view it as a critical period because society is vulnerable to division if it is not directed properly. This study concluded that the Era of Society 5.0 is described as a period when humans and their mindsets are trapped between material needs and the desire for existence. Technology that is interconnected and accessed without limits presents a complex situation. The streams of materialism and existentialism provide an overview of the situation of society in two related sides.

Rahmawati, M., Ruslan, A., & Bandarsyah, D. (2021). The Era of Society 5.0 as the unification of humans and technology: A literature review on materialism and existentialism. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika, 16(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.20473/jsd.v16i2.2021.151-162

Download Citation

Arikunto S (2019) Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka Cipta.

Beltrami M, Orzes G, Sarkis J, & Sartor M (2021) Industry 4.0 and sustainability: Towards conceptualization and theory. Journal of Cleaner Production 312: 127733. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.127733.

Budiardjo M (2018) Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Desyana C (2013) Mengintip gaya foto sosialita saat arisan. Tempo.co, April 27. [Accessed 01 September 2021]. https://gaya.tempo.co/read/476239/mengintip-gaya-foto-sosialita-saat-arisan/full&view=ok.

Ekawati D (2017) Eksistensialisme. Tarbawiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan 12 (1):137-153.

Foresti R, Rossi S, Magnani M, Guarino Lo Bianco C, & Delmonte N (2020) Smart society and artificial intelligence: Big data scheduling and the global standard method applied to smart maintenance. Engineering 6 (7):835-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2019.11.014.

Ghobakhloo M, Fathi M, Iranmanesh M, Maroufkhani P, & Morales ME (2021) Industry 4.0 ten years on: A bibliometric and systematic review of concepts, sustainability value drivers, and success determinants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.127052.

Jamwal A, Agrawal R, Sharma M, Kumar V, & Kumar S (2021) Developing a sustainability framework for Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 98: 430-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCIR.2021.01.129.

Kariarta IW (2020) Paradigma materialisme dialektis di era milenial. Sanjiwani: Jurnal Filsafat 11 (1):71-81.

Kazancoglu Y, Sezer MD, Ozkan-Ozen YD, Mangla SK, & Kumar A (2021) Industry 4.0 impacts on responsible environmental and societal management in the family business. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173: 121108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2021.121108.

Khaldun I (2011) Mukkadimah. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar.

Koentjaraningrat (2015) Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: PT Rhineka Cipta.

Kristanto A (2020) Society 5.0: Sebuah transformasi kehidupan masa depan. [Accessed 01 September 2021]. http://agungkristanto.ie.uad.ac.id/2020/02/society-50-sebuah-transformasi.html.

Mahmudi I (2019) Urgensi perilaku keagamaan pada era society 5.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bimbingan Dan Konseling 3 (1):8-17.

Maison D & Adamczyk D (2020) The relations between materialism, consumer decisions and advertising perception. Procedia Computer Science 176: 2526-2535. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2020.09.320.

MaÅ‚ajowicz AB, ZegleÅ„ P, & Bernat T (2019) Knowledge and educational capital in the process of modern society creation. Procedia Computer Science 159: 2461-2469. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2019.09.421.

Meindl B, Ayala NF, Mendonça J, & Frank AG (2021) The four smarts of industry 4.0: Evolution of ten years of research and future perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2021.120784.

Miles MB (1992) Analisis Data Kualitatif : Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Depok: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.

Nagy K & Hajrizi E (2019) Building pillars for adapting society 5.0 in post-conflict countries. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (25):40-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IFACOL.2019.12.443.

Nakagawa EY, Antonino PO, Schnicke F, Capilla R, Kuhn T, & Liggesmeyer P (2021) Industry 4.0 reference architectures: State of the art and future trends. Computers and Industrial Engineering 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2021.107241.

Nastiti FE & Abdu ARN (2020). Kajian: Kesiapan pendidikan Indonesia menghadapi era society 5.0. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan 5 (1):61-66.

Prasetyo B & Trisyanti U (2018). Revolusi industri 4.0 dan tantangan perubahan sosial. Prosiding SEMATEKOS 3 "Strategi Pembangunan Nasional Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0,” 0 (5):22-27. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2018i5.4417.

Putri VKM (2021) Dampak kemajuan teknologi di bidang sosial dan budaya. Kompas.com, September 04. [Accessed 01 September 2021]. https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2021/04/09/142234669/dampak-kemajuan-teknologi-di-bidang-sosial-dan-budaya?page=all.

Ritzer G & Smart B (2018) Handbook Teori Sosial. Jakarta: Penerbit Nusa Media.

Salim I (2010) Aliran filsafat eksistensialis. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Dan Humaniora 1 (2):183-190.

Sallati C & Schützer K (2021) Development of smart products for elders within the Industry 4.0 context: A conceptual framework. Procedia CIRP 100: 810-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCIR.2021.05.039.

Sharma AK, Bhandari R, Pinca-Bretotean C, Sharma C, Dhakad SK, & Mathur A (2021) A study of trends and industrial prospects of industry 4.0. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.04.321.

Sianipar CY, Junita M, Ananda NT, Pranata NFR, & Dewi SP (2019) Diduga kaya, ternyata hanya gaya. Aceh Online, November 19. [Accessed 01 September 2021]. https://www.acehonline.co/feature/diduga-kayaternyata-hanya-gaya/.

Sindhunata (2020) Dilema Usaha Manusia Rasional (Teori Kritis Sekolah Frankfurt). Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Soekanto S (2015) Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Suriasumantri JS (2015) Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Apresiasi terhadap Ilmu, Agama, dan Seni. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Suwardana H (2018) Revolusi industri 4. 0 berbasis revolusi mental. JATI UNIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Dan Manajemen Industri 1 (1):109-118. https://doi.org/10.30737/jatiunik.v1i2.117.

Syamsuddin M (2005) N. Driyakara SJ dan filsafat eksistensialisme. SOSIO – RELIGIA 4 (4):759-773.

Tabaa M, Monteiro F, Bensag H, & Dandache A (2020) Green industrial internet of things from a smart industry perspectives. Energy Reports 6 (June):430-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.022.

Tambunan SF (2016) Kebebasan individu manusia abad dua puluh: Filsafat eksistensialisme Sartre (freedom of human's individualism in the twenthieth century: Sartre's philosophy of existntialism). Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya 18 (2):215-232.

Wankhede VA & Vinodh S (2021) Analysis of industry 4.0 challenges using best worst method: A case study. Computers and Industrial Engineering 159: 107487. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2021.107487.

Yaish M & Andersen R (2012) Social mobility in 20 modern societies: The role of economic and political context. Social Science Research 41 (3):527-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSRESEARCH.2011.12.001.

Zufar BNF & Sari EK (2021) The other space of social media: Concept study of heterotopia on Instagram. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika 16 (1):12-23.

The Era of Society 5.0 as the unification of humans and technology: A literature review on materialism and existentialism

Authors

Downloads

Melinda Rahmawati, History Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Prof. Dr. Hamka

Ahmad Ruslan, History Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Prof. Dr. Hamka

Desvian Bandarsyah, History Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Prof. Dr. Hamka

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Login

Instruction for Author

Journal Policy

Journal Standing

EditorialTeam

Meet Our Editorial Team

Accreditation Certificate

Accreditation Certificate

Citation Analysis

Citation Analysis

Indexed In

Indexed In

Tools

Tools

visitor

Visitors

Current Issue

Address

Contact Info: