Hybrid coworking spaces for remote workers: The role of cafés and Discord channels as a unified community hub
Downloads
Remote work has become increasingly popular in recent years, particularly following the global shift in work dynamics due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Such situations lead to new challenges in maintaining social connections and productivity among workers. Therefore, this study examines how hybrid coworking spaces, including cafés and Discord channels, function as community hubs for remote workers. Using a qualitative approach, the researcher conducted digital ethnography over six months (June-November 2023) on a coworking community for remote workers in Surabaya, Indonesia. In-depth interviews with eleven remote workers were also conducted. The findings show that cafés provide a social and productive environment as it gives remote workers a balance of focus and casual interaction. Discord channels further support this by creating a virtual coworking space that facilitates continuous communication, collaboration, and emotional support. The hybrid coworking spaces then creates a unified community hub that help reduce loneliness and build social connections among remote workers. This approach not only increases workers’ productivity but also enhances emotional well-being. It provides remote workers with both social energy and flexibility. The study concludes that the integration of physical and digital spaces can form a sense of community which supports remote workers in maintaining motivation and connection.
Anderson D & Kelliher C (2009) Flexible working and engagement: the importance of choice. Strategic HR Review 8 (2):13-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/14754390910937530.
Aroles J, Mitev N, & de Vaujany F-X (2019) Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment 34 (3):285-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12146.
Bloom N, Liang J, Roberts J, & Ying ZJ (2015) Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130 (1):165-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032.
Broadway M, Legg R, & Broadway J (2019) Coffeehouses and the art of social engagement: An analysis of Portland coffeehouses. Geographical Review 109 (4):433-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12253.
Choudhury P, Foroughi C, & Larson B (2020) Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Management Unit Working Paper No. 19-054. Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper No. 3494473. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3494473.
De Laat K (2023) Living to work (from home): Overwork, remote work, and gendered dual devotion to work and family. Work and Occupations 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231207772.Discord (nd) About us. Discord. https://discord.com/company.
Droumeva M (2021) Soundscapes of productivity: The coffee-office and the sonic gentrification of work. Resonance 2 (3):377-394. https://doi.org/10.1525/res.2021.2.3.377.
Egan H, Elsmore I, & Egan D (2022) Café tribes: A typology of café customers. In: Tabari S & Chen W (ed). Global Strategic Management in The Service Industry: A Perspective of the New Era. 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-081-920221012.
Ferreira J, Ferreira C, & Bos E (2021) Spaces of consumption, connection, and community: Exploring the role of the coffee shop in urban lives. Geoforum 119: 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.12.024.
Gajendran RS & Harrison JK (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological and organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (6):1524-1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524.
Garcia AC, Standlee AI, Bechkoff J, & Cui Y (2009) Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38 (1):52-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416073108.
Gibbs M, Mengel F, & Siemroth C (2021) Work from home & productivity: Evidence from personnel & analytics data on IT professionals. Chicago Booth Research Paper No. 21-13. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3845657.
Gifford J (2022) Remote working: Unprecedented increase and a developing research agenda. Human Resource Development International 25 (2):105-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2049108.
Hafermalz E & Riemer K (2020) Interpersonal connectivity work: being there with and for geographically distant others. Organization Studies 41 (12):1627-1648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620973.
Hine C (2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Kaiser S, Suess S, Cohen R, Mikkelsen EN, & Pedersen AR (2022) Working from home: Findings and prospects for further research. German Journal of Human Resource Management 36 (3):205-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022221106973.
Kowalski KB, Aruldoss A, Gurumurthy B, & Parayitam S (2022) Work-from-home productivity and job satisfaction: A double-layered moderated mediation model. Sustainability 14 (18):11179. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811179.
McArthur JA & White AF (2016) Twitter chats as third places: Conceptualizing a digital gathering site. Social Media + Society 2 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116665857.
McPhail R (2021) What in the world will the office look like post COVID-19? People, productivity and planet: The opportunities, barriers and challenges. Griffith Business School White Paper, Griffith University. https://www.griffith.edu.au/work-organisation-wellbeing/research/publications.
McPhail R, Chan XW (C), May R, & Wilkinson A (2024) Post-COVID remote working and its impact on people, productivity, and the planet: An exploratory scoping review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 35 (1):154-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.2221385.
Montgomery J (1997) Café culture and the city: The role of pavement cafés in urban public social life. Journal of Urban Design 2 (1):83-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809708724397.
Ng PML, Lit KK, & Cheung CTY (2022) Remote work as a new normal? The technology-organizationenvironment (TOE) context. Technology in Society 70: 102022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102022.
Nguyen TVT, Han H, Sahito N, & Lam TN (2019) The Bookstore-Café: Emergence of a New Lifestyle as a “Third Place” in Hangzhou, China. Space and Culture 22 (2):216-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331218795832.
Oldenburg R (1999) The Great Good Place: Café, Coffeehouse, Community, and the Public Life. Paragon House.
Orel M, Mayerhoffer M, & Chytkova Z (2023) “We were working together, apart”: Shifting fundamentals of pandemic disrupted coworking environments. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.12.002.
Raghuram S (2021) Remote work implications for organisational culture. In: Kumar P, Agrawal A, & Budhwar P (ed). Work from Home: Multi-level Perspectives on the New Normal. 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-661-220210009.
Raj R, Kumar V, Sharma NK, Singh S, Mahlawat S, & Verma P (2023) The study of remote working outcome and its influence on firm performance. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 8: 100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100528.
Saldana J (2013) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 2nd Edition. London: SAGE.
Soukup C (2006) Computer-mediated communication as a virtual third place: Building Oldenburg’s great good places on the world wide web. New Media & Society 8 (3):421-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806061953.
Taser D, Aydin E, Torgaloz AO, & Rofcanin Y (2022) An examination of remote e-working and flow experience: The role of technostress and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior 127: 107020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107020.
Tjora A & Scambler G (2014) Café Society. Contemporary Sociology 43 (4):597-598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306114539453h.
Xiao Y, Becerik-Gerber B, Lucas G, & Roll SC (2021) Impacts of working from home during COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental well-being of office workstation users. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 63 (3):181. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002097.
Yang L, Holtz D, Jaffe S, Suri S, Sinha S, Weston J, Joyce C, Shah N, Sherman K, Hecht B, & Teevan J (2022) The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behaviour 6 (1):43-54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of author, whilst the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
2. Legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
3. Every publications (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other that the aims mentioned above, editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.