Effectiveness Comparison of Using Macintosh Blade and Mccoy Blade For Endotracheal Intubation In Anesthesia Residents
Downloads
Chi, T. L., Mirsky, D. M., Bello, J. A., & Ferson DZ. Radiographic and cross sectional imaging of the airway. In: Hagberg, C A Hagberg and benumof's airway management [Internet]. 4 th. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.; 2018. Available from: https://t.me/Anesthesia_Books
Baker, P.A., & Timmermann A. Laryngoscopic tracheal intubation. In: Hagberg and benumof's airway management [Internet]. 4 th. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.; 2018. Available from: https://t.me/Anesthesia_Books
Gómez JC, Melo LP, Orozco Y, Chicangana GA, Osorio DC. Estimation of the optimum length of endotracheal tube insertion in adults. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2016;44(3):230–5.
Nadkarni DM, Patel DRD, Behera DP, Walzade DA. Comparison of Macintosh, McCoy and Miller Laryngoscope Blades for Intubation- A Prospective Randomised Study. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2016;15(08):85–91.
R. H. Korelasi upper lip bite dengan mallampati sebagai prediktor kesulitan intubasi. Udayana; 2017.
Dorsey D JA. Physiology and pathophysiology responses to intubation Title. In: Hagberg and benumof's airway management 4th ed Philadephia: Elsevier. 2018.
Butterworth, J. F., Mackey, D.C., & Wasnick JD. Analgesic agents. In: Clinical anesthesiology. 5 th. New York: Mc Graw hill education; 2013.
Simatupang RH. Korelasi upper lip bite test (ulbt) dengan mallampati sebagai prediktor kesulitan intubasi di rumah sakit sanglah denpasar. 2014;7–139.
Fink WA. The pathophysiology of acute pain. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2005;23(2):277–84.
Korukonda V, Kaladhar S. Attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation a comparative study between I.V. labetalol and I.V. lignocaine. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2020;7(4):676–80.
Aggarwal H, Kaur S, Baghla N, Kaur S. Hemodynamic Response to Orotracheal Intubation: Comparison between Macintosh, McCoy, and C-MAC Video Laryngoscope. Anesth Essays Res. 2019;13(2):308.
Tewari P, Gupta D, Kumar A SU. Opioid sparing during endotracheal intubation using McCoy laryngoscope in neurosurgical patients: the comparison of haemodinamyc changes with Macintosh blade in a randomized. J Postgraduation Med. 2019;
Bharti N, Arora S, Panda NB. A comparison of McCoy, TruView, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with immobilized cervical spine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014;8(2):188–92.
Yildirim A, Kiraz HA, Ağaoğlu Ä°, Akdur O. Comparison of Macintosh, McCoy and C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope intubation by prehospital emergency health workers: a simulation study. Intern Emerg Med. 2017;12(1):91–7.
Akbarzadeh S, Gillani M, Tabari M MN. Comparative analysis of the usefulness of the glidescope, macintosh, and McCoy laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in patient with obesity. Anesth Pain Med. 2017;
Altun D, Ali A, Camci E, Ozonur A, Ozkan Seyhan T. Haemodynamic Response to Four Different Laryngoscopes. Turkish J Anesth Reanim. 2018;46(6):434–40.
Haidry MA, Khan FA. Comparison of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29(2):196–9.
Buhari F S V. . Randomized cotrolled study comparing the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with McCoy, macintosh, and c-mac laryngoscopes in adult patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016;
McHardy FE, Chung F. Postoperative sore throat: Cause, prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia. 1999;54(5):444–53.
Steeds CE. The anatomy and physiology of pain. Surg (United Kingdom) [Internet]. 2016;34(2):55–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2015.11.005
McCOY EP, MIRAKHUR RK. The levering laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 1993;48(6):516–9.
Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (IJAR) licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyright holder is the author.
2. The journal allows the author to share (copy and redistribute) and adapt (remix, transform, and build) upon the works under license without restrictions.
3. The journal allows the author to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
4. The changed works must be available under the same, similar, or compatible license as the original.
5. The journal is not responsible for copyright violations against the requirement as mentioned above.