Accuracy Comparison of Endotracheal Tube (ETT) Placement Using Chula Formula With Manubrium Sternal Joint (MSJ) Formula
Downloads
Introduction: Intubation mistakes, such as ETT malposition, will result in serious complications. Endobronchial intubation can cause pneumothorax and contralateral lung collapse (atelectasis). On the contrary, superficial ETT could increase the risk of being released easily, leading to desaturation or even cardiac arrest. A shallow ETT position could cause the compression of the vocal cord and laryngeal nerve by ETT's cuff. An optimal position can be reached if the cuff position is 1.5-2.5 cm under the vocal cord and the tip is 3-5 cm above the carina. Several methods of ETT depth measurement based on airway length data can be an alternative, especially during the COVID-19 era, where the use of a stethoscope to check ETT depth is limited. Objectives: To analyze the accuracy of ETT depth placement using Chula and MSJ formula. Methods: We conducted the prospective comparative analytic research on 50 patients who had elective surgery in GBPT operating room at Dr. Soetomo Hospital Surabaya. The research data during the intubation and FOL (Fyber Optic Laryngoscope) from each patient were height, MSJ length, initial ETT length, the distance of carina-ETT tip, the distance of cuff-vocal cord, and final ETT length. Result: In the Chula formula group, the average patients' height was 160.60cm ± 9.738 for men and 157.76 cm ± 8.604 for women. The average MSJ length was 20.28 cm. The application of the Chula formula is more accurate because ETT revision was carried out in only 8.0% of the samples, with an average revision is 0.04. On the other hand, the ETT revision with an average of 0.868 on the MSJ formula group was conducted in 84% of the samples. This research also found a linear correlation between increasing ETT depth and body height. Conclusion: Applying the Chula formula to measure the ETT depth for Indonesian (Javanese) people is more appropriate than the MSJ formula.
Baker, P.A., & Timmermann A. Laryngoscopic tracheal intubation. In: Hagberg and benumof's airway management [Internet]. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.; 2018. Available from: https://t.me/Anesthesia_ Books
Gómez JC, Melo LP, Orozco Y, Chicangana GA, Osorio DC. Estimation of the optimum length of endotracheal tube insertion in adults. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2016;44(3):230–5.
Bodenham AR, Mallick A. Airway management in the ICU [Internet]. Eighth Edi. Core Topics in Airway Management. Elsevier Inc.; 2011. 262–273 p. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/B978-0-7020-5283-5.00055-2
Varshney M, Sharma K, Kumar R, Varshney PG. Appropriate depth of placement of oral endotracheal tube and its possible determinants in Indian adult patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2011; 55(5):488–93.
Lee BJ, Yi JW, Chung JY, Kim DO, Kang JM. Bedside prediction of airway length in adults and children. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(3):556–60.
Kumari S, Prakash S, Mullick P, Guria S, Girdhar KK. Clinical implications of vocal cord-carina distance and tracheal length in the indian population. Turkish J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019;47(6): 456–63.
Techanivate A, Rodanant O, Charoenraj P, Kumwilaisak K. Depth of endotracheal tubes in Thai adult patients. J Med Assoc Thail. 2005; 88(6):775–81.
Collins SR, Blank RS. Fiberoptic intubation: An overview and update. Respir Care. 2014;59(6):865–80.
Mukherjee S, Ray M, Pal R. Bedside prediction of airway length by measuring upper incisor manubrio-sternal joint length. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014;30(2):188–94.
Straker, T., & Urdaneta F. Confirmation of tracheal intubation. In: Hagberg and benumof's Airway management [Internet]. 4 th. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.; 2018. Available from: https://t.me/Anesthesia_Books
Lal A, Pena ED, Sarcilla DJ, Perez PP, Wong JC, Khan FA. Ideal Length of Oral Endotracheal Tube for Critically Ill Intubated Patients in an Asian Population: Comparison to Current Western Standards. Cureus. 2018; 10(11).
Herway ST, Benumof JL. The tracheal accordion and the position of the endotracheal tube. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017;45(2):177–88.
Fatmah, Erwin. Development of anthropometric chair based on arm span, knee height, and sitting height for elderly. Int J GEOMATE. 2016; 11(6): 2844–50.
Sandy, R. A., Herman R. & I. Formula Chula sebagai prediktor ketepatan kedalaman Endotrachea tube pada intubasi nasotrakeal. J Anasthesia Perioper. 2019;7(1):42–7.
Busetto L, Calo' E, Mazza M, De Stefano F, Costa G, Negrin V, et al. Upper airway size is related to obesity and body fat distribution in women. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2009; 266(4):559–63.
Lin H, Xiong H, Ji C, Wang C, Li Y, An Y, et al. Upper airway lengthening caused by weight increase in obstructive sleep apnea patients. Respir Res. 2020;21(1):1–10.
Ronen O, Malhotra A, Pillar G. Influence of gender and age on upper-airway length during development. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):1–14.
Pang G, Edwards MJ, Greenland KB. Vocal cords-carina distance in anesthetized Caucasian adults and its clinical implications for tracheal intubation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38(6):1029–33.
Cherng CH, Wong CS, Hsu CH, Ho ST. Airway length in adults: Estimation of the optimal endotracheal tube length for orotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14(4):271–4.
Evron S, Weisenberg M, Harow E, Khazin V, Szmuk P, Gavish D, et al. Proper insertion depth of endotracheal tubes in adults by topographic landmarks measurements. J Clin Anesth.2007;19(1):15–9
Copyright (c) 2021 Christya Lorena, Hamzah, Maulydia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (IJAR) licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyright holder is the author.
2. The journal allows the author to share (copy and redistribute) and adapt (remix, transform, and build) upon the works under license without restrictions.
3. The journal allows the author to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
4. The changed works must be available under the same, similar, or compatible license as the original.
5. The journal is not responsible for copyright violations against the requirement as mentioned above.