Adaptability of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Biofloc Systems: Effects on Growth, Feed Efficiency, Water Quality, and Economic Viability
Downloads
Biofloc Technology (BFT) has emerged as a sustainable and cost-effective solution for aquaculture, addressing critical challenges such as water conservation, feed efficiency, and environmental impact. This study investigates the adaptability of Nile tilapia at different life stages to BFT systems, focusing on growth performance, survival rates, feed conversion ratios (FCR), and economic viability. Three treatments were evaluated: 20-day-old tilapia fry (T1), 35-day-old juvenile tilapia (T2), and 50-day-old adult tilapia (T3), each with three replications. Over a 14-week rearing period, weekly sampling revealed significant differences (p<0.05) in growth and survival rates. Juvenile tilapia (T2) demonstrated superior adaptability, achieving the highest final weight gain (292.33 ± 5.54 g), survival rate (98.67 ± 0.58%), and economic return, with the best benefit-cost ratio (BCR: 1.426) and lowest FCR (0.647 ± 0.028). These findings highlight the potential of BFT to enhance sustainable aquaculture practices by improving feed efficiency, reducing operational costs, and increasing profitability for farmers. This study underscores the commercial viability of using juvenile tilapia in BFT systems, offering a scalable and environmentally friendly approach to meet the growing demand for aquaculture production.
Avnimelech, Y., Kochva M. and Diab S., 1994. Development of controlled intensive aquaculture systems with a limited water exchange and adjusted carbon to nitrogen ratio. Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidgeh, 46(3), pp.119–131. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284802042_Development_of_controlled_intensive_aquaculture_systems_with_limited_water_exchange_and_adjusted_carbon_to_nitrogen_ratio#fullTextFileContent
Avnimelech, Y., 2009. Biofloc technology—a practical guidebook. Baton Rouge: The World Aquaculture Society.
Avnimelech, Y., 2015. Biofloc Technology – A Practical Guidebook. 3rd edn. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: The World Aquaculture Society. https://www.was.org/shopping/biofloc-technology-a-practical-guidbook-3rd-edition
Azim, M.E. and Little, D.C., 2008. The biofloc technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: Water quality, biofloc composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 283(1-4), pp.29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.036
Boyd, C.E., D’Abramo, L.R., Glencross, B.D., Huyben, D.C., Juarez, L.M., Lockwood, G.S., McNevin, A.A., Tacon, A.G.J., Teletchea, F., Tomasso, J.R., Tucker, C.S. and Valenti, W.C., 2020. Achieving sustainable aquaculture: Historical and current perspectives and future needs and challenges. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 51(3), pp.578–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12714
Crab, R., Avnimelech, Y., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P. and Verstraete, W., 2007. Nitrogen removal techniques in aquaculture for a sustainable production. Aquaculture, 270(1-4), pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.05.006
Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P. and Verstraete, W., 2012. Biofloc technology in aquaculture: Beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture, 356–357, pp.351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.046
Custódio, M., Villasante, S., Calado, R. and Lillebø, A.I., 2020. Valuation of Ecosystem Services to promote sustainable aquaculture practices. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(1), pp.392-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12324
Emerenciano, M., Ballester, E.L.C., Cavalli, R.O. and Wasielesky, W., 2011. Effect of biofloc technology (BFT) on the early postlarval stage of pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis: growth performance, floc composition and salinity stress tolerance. Aquaculture International, 19, pp.891–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-010-9408-6
Emerenciano, M., Ballester, E.L.C., Cavalli, R.O. and Wasielesky, W., 2012. Biofloc technology application as a food source in a limited water exchange nursery system for pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817). Aquaculture Research, 43(3), pp.447-457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02848.x
FAO, 2016. El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura. Rome. https://doi.org/978-92-5-306675-9
FAO, 2020. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Nature and Resources. p.244. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en
Gutierrez-Wing, M.T. and Malone, R.F., 2006. Biological filters in aquaculture: trends and research directions for freshwater and marine applications. Aquacultural Engineering, 34(3), pp.163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.08.003
Hajdasiński, M.M., 1993. The Payback Period as a Measure of Profitability and Liquidity. The Engineering Economist: A Journal Devoted to the Problems of Capital Investment, 38(3), pp.177-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00137919308903096
Hargreaves, J.A., 2013. Biofloc production systems for aquaculture. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center, 4503, pp.1-11. https://course.cutm.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/biofloc-for-Finfish.pdf
Khanjani, M.H., Sharifinia, M. and Emerenciano, M.G.C., 2024. Biofloc technology (BFT) in aquaculture: What goes right, what goes wrong? A scientific-based snapshot. Aquaculture Research, 2024(1), 7496572. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7496572.
Kumaran, M., Vasagam, K.P.K., Kailasam, M., Subburaj, R., Anand, P.R., Ravisankar, T., Sendhilkumar, R., Santhanakumar, J. and Vijayan, K. K., 2021. Three-tier cage aquaculture of Asian Seabass (Lates calcarifer) fish in the coastal brackish waters - A techno-economic appraisal. Aquaculture, 543, 737025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737025
Megahed, M.E., 2010. The effect of microbial biofloc on water quality, survival, and growth of the green tiger shrimp Penaeus semisulcatus fed with different crude protein levels. Journal of the Arabian Aquaculture Society, 5(2), pp.119-142. https://www.arabaqs.org/journal/vol_5/2/Text 10 - 10.pdf
Rakocy, J.E., Bailey, D.S., Thoman, E.S. and Shultz, R.C., 2004. Intensive tank culture of tilapia with a suspended, bacterial-based treatment process: new dimensions in farmed tilapia’, in Bolivar, R., Mair, G. and Fitzsimmons, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture. pp.584-596. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237419505_
Rana, K.J. and Hassan, M.R., 2013. On-farm feeding and feed management practices for sustainable aquaculture production: an analysis of case studies from selected Asian and African countries. On-farm feeding and feed management in aquaculture. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture, 583, pp.21-67. https://www.fao.org/fishery/docs/CDrom/T583/root/02.pdf
Roy, P., Chandan, C.S.S., Roy, N.C. and Islam, I., 2020. Feed types affect the growth, survival and cannibalism in early juvenile of striped snakehead (Channa striata Bloch). The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 46(4), pp.377-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2020.08.009
Taw, N., 2010. Biofloc technology expanding at white shrimp farms. Global Advocate, 10, pp.24-26. https://www.globalseafood.org/advocate/biofloc-technology-expanding-white-shrimp-farms/
Zar, J.H., 1996., Biostatistical Analysis. 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1342633
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Aquaculture and Fish Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The copyright of this journal belongs to the Editorial Board, based on the author's consent, while the moral rights of the publication belong to the author(s).
2. The formal legal aspect of journal accessibility refers to the same Creative Common Attribution + Noncommercial + ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implying that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form.
3. Every publication (printed/electronic) is open access for educational, research and library purposes. In addition to the objectives stated above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright infringement
.png)
