Differences Between Nrs-2002 and Must in Relation to the Metabolic Condition of Trauma Patients

Oktaffrastya Widhamurti Septafani, Suharto Suharto, Harmayetty Harmayetty

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jn.v13i1.7518
Abstract views = 46 times | views = 16 times


Introduction: Flow phase with high cardiac output and increased metabolic conditions. When metabolic conditions are not stable there will be a long duration of complications until death. One of the benefits of Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS-2002) is reliable inpatient care for critical patients. While the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) shows speed in the classification of nutritional disorders.

Methods: This study used the observational design method. The sampling technique in this study used Consecutive sampling in accordance with the criteria consisting of 31 respondents. This was to determine the specificity and sensitivity values of NRS 2002 and MUST using contingency table analysis and for the Area Under Curve (AUC) using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: The sensitivity values in MUST was predicted for metabolic conditions which was higher than when using NRS 2002, but the specificity and value of AUC (Area Under Curve) was higher using NRS 2002 than using MUST when it came to predicting metabolic conditions.

Conclusions: There were differences in effectiveness between use of Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) with the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) in relation to changes in metabolic conditions of trauma patients. NRS-2002 is more effective than MUST. NRS 2002 has the ability to identify patients more precisely who are likely to have a negative outcome.


NRS 2002; MUST; metabolic response; trauma

Full Text:



Al Kalaldeh, M., & Shahin, M. (2014). Nurses’ knowledge and responsibility toward nutritional assessment for patients in intensive care units. Journal of Health Sciences, 4(2), 90. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.stir.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=100323167&site=eds-live

Ansari, M. R., Susetyowati, & Pramantara, I. (2014). Uji validitas skrining status gizi NRS 2002 dengan asesmen biokimia untuk mendeteksi risiko malnutrition di RSUP dr. Sardjito yogyakarta. Gizi Indon, 37((1)), 1–12.

Barendregt, K., P.B. Soeters, S.P. Allison and J.Kondrup, 2008. Basic concepts in nutrition: Diagnosis of malnutrition: Screening and assessment. e-SPEN, E. Spen. Eur. E. J. Clin. Nutr. Metab., 3: 121-125.

Chen, Z. Y., Gao, C., Ye, T., Zuo, X. Z., Wang, G. H., Xu, X. S., & Yao, Y. (2015). Association between nutritional risk and routine clinical laboratory measurements and adverse outcomes: A prospective study in hospitalized patients of wuhan tongji hospital. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69(5), 552–557. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.239

Jayawardena, R., Lokunarangoda, N. C., Ranathunga, I., Santharaj, W. S., Walawwatta, A. O., & Pathirana, A. K. (2016). Predicting clinical outcome of cardiac patients by six malnutrition screening tools. BMC Nutrition, 2(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-016-0044-z

Kondrup, J., Allison, S. P., Elia, M., Vellas, B., & Plauth, M. (2003). ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clinical Nutrition, 22(4), 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5614(03)00098-0

Kuppinger, D., Hartl, W. H., Bertok, M., Hoffmann, J. M., Cederbaum, J., Bender, A., … Rittler, P. (2013). Nutritional screening for risk prediction in patients scheduled for extra-abdominal surgery. Nutrition, 29(2), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2012.06.013

Lee, J. O., Benjamin, D., & Herndon, D. N. (2005). Nutrition Support Strategies for Severely Burned Patients. Nutricion on Clinical Practice, 20(June), 325–330.

Leuenberger, M., Kurmann, S. & Stanga, Z. Support Care Cancer (2010) 18(Suppl 2): 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0805-1

Lomivorotov, V. V., Efremov, S. M., Boboshko, V. A., Nikolaev, D. A., Vedernikov, P. E., Lomivorotov, V. N., & Karaskov, A. M. (2013). Evaluation of nutritional screening tools for patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. Nutrition, 29(2), 436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2012.08.006

MacLeod, J. B. a. (2005). Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 58(3), 652–653. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000157822.40227.F2

Nugrahani, Azizah. (2007). Hubungan Asupan Protein terhadap Kadar Urea Nitrogen, Kreatinin, dan Albumin Darah Pasien Penyakit Gagal Ginjal Kronik yang menjalani hemodialisis di RSUP dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta. Skripsi. Yogyarkarta:Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2007.

Plebani, M. (2012). (2013)Quality Indicators To Detect Pre-Analytical Errors In Laboratory Testing.pdf, 33(August), 85–88.

Raslan, M., Gonzalez, M. C., Torrinhas, R. S. M. M., Ravacci, G. R., Pereira, J. C. R., & Waitzberg, D. L. (2011). Complementarity of Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) for predicting poor clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 30(1), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2010.07.002

Schiesser, M., Muller, S., Kirchhoff, P., Breitenstein, S., Schafer, M., & Clavien, P.-A. (2008). Assessment of a novel screening score for nutritional risk in predicting complications in gastro-intestinal surgery. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 27(4), 565–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2008.01.010

Sobrino, J., & Shafi, S. (2013). Timing and causes of death after injuries. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 26(2), 120–3. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3603725&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

Şimşek, T., Şimşek, H. U., & Cantürk, N. Z. (2014). Response to trauma and metabolic changes : posttraumatic metabolism, 153–159. https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2014.2653Jakob, S. M., & Stanga, Z. (2010). Perioperative metabolic changes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Nutrition, 26(4), 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2009.07.014

Soop, M., Nygren, J., Thorell, A., & Ljungqvist, O. (2007). Stress-induced insulin resistance: recent developments. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 10(2), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e32801481df

Simanjuntak, T. (2010). Hubungan Skrinning Gizi NRS 2002 dan MUST dengan Asesmen biokimia pada Pasien Bangsal Penyakit Dalam dan Syarap RSUP Dr. SardjitoYogyakarta. Skripsi. Yogyakarta:Universitas Gajah Mada, 2010.

Weekes, C. E., Elia, M., & Emery, P. W. (2004). The development, validation and reliability of a nutrition screening tool based on the recommendations of the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN). Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 23(5), 1104–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2004.02.003


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Ners

This journal is indexed by:





Creative Commons License

This journal (p-ISSN:1858-3598; e-ISSN:2502-5791) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter