Climate Litigation in Indonesia: Lessons from the Royal Dutch Shell Case
Downloads
This article compares the concept of unlawful act in the Indonesian and Dutch Civil Codes, with specific attention to the notorious decision of the Milieudefensie et al v. Royal Dutch Shell Case. Therein, the Dutch Court applied unwritten law under Article 6:612 of the Dutch Civil Code, calling for reduction in carbon emissions through policy changes by the Shell group. The use of unwritten law allowed for a comprehensive assessment of legal bases, including international soft law instruments, such as the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Inspired by such a decision, this article aims to unveil the readiness of Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code in entertaining a similar case. It compares the approach taken in the Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell Case with pertinent decisions by the Indonesian court concerning the implementation of Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Furthermore, it focuses on two prongs of civil liability that are necessary for establishment: 1) unwritten law; and 2) causality. By doing so, this article aims to contribute to the evolving realm of climate litigation, specifically within the framework of civil law.
Indonesian Civil Code.
Burgerlijk Wetboek (Dutch Civil Code).
Agustina R, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Program Pascasarjana FHUI 2003).
Arie Rompas et al. v. Government of Indonesia case (Court Decision No. 118/Pdt.G/LH/2016/PNPlk).
Backes C and Veen G van der, ‘Urgenda: The Final Judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court' (2020) 17 Journal For European Environmental & Planning Law.
Bakker C, ‘Climate Change Litigation in the Netherlands: The Urgenda Case and Beyond' in Ivano Alogna, Christine Bakker and Jean-Pierre Gauci (eds), Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives (Brill Nijhoff 2021).
Beumers T and Boom W van, ‘Tortious and Contractual Liability from a Dutch Perspective' in Ernst Karner (ed), Tortious and Contractual Liability – Chinese and European Perspectives (Jan Sramek Verlag 2021).
Braje E-M, ‘Is Civil Litigation a Proper Tool to Stop Climate Change?' (Ince, 2021) <https://www.incegd.com/index.php/en/news-insights/energy-infrastructure-civil-litigation-proper-tool-stop-climate-change> accessed 20 February 2023.
‘Brief Review of 2019' (Hoge Raad Der Nederlanden Jaarverslag 2019, 2019) <https://2019.jaarverslaghogeraad.nl/2019-highlighted/brief-review-of-2019> accessed 26 February 2023.
DW, ‘Empat Warga Pulau Pari Gugat Raksasa Semen Eropa' (DW.com, 2023) <https://www.dw.com/id/empat-warga-pulau-pari-gugat-raksasa-semen-eropa/a-64628743> accessed 25 February 2023.
Farber DA, ‘How Legal Systems Deal with Issues of Responsibility for Past Harmful Behavior' in Lukas H Meyer and Pranay Sanklecha (eds), Climate Justice and Historical Emissions (Cambridge University Press 2017).
Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie) v Royal Dutch Shell, District Court The Hague, Judgment of 26 May 2021, English translation at <http://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:5339>.
Giabardo CV, ‘Climate Change Litigation and Tort Law: Regulation Through Litigation?' [2020] SSRN Electronic Journal <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3858956>.
Giesen I, de Jong E and Overheul M, ‘How Dutch Tort Law Responds to Risks', Regulating Risk through Private Law (Intersentia) <https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9781780686370A056/type/book_part>.
Hakim L, ‘Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup Melalui Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum' (2021) 2 Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 1264 <https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/149>.
Indonesian Supreme Court Decision No. 1794K/Pdt/2004.
Jagers NMCP and Heijden M-J van der, ‘Corporate Human Rights Violations: The Feasibility of Civil Recourse in the Netherlands' (2008) 33 SYMPOSIUM: Corporate Liability for Grave Breaches of International Law <https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol33/iss3/2>.
Macchi C and van Zeben J, ‘Business and Human Rights Implications of Climate Change Litigation: Milieudefensie et Al . v Royal Dutch Shell' (2021) 30 Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 409 <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/reel.12416>.
Malik A, Sanusi S and Sudewo F, ‘Corporate Strict Liability in Environmental Crimes in Indonesia and the Netherlands', Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, MALAPY 2022, 28 May 2022, Tegal, Indonesia (EAI 2022) <http://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.28-5-2022.2320558>.
Mandalawangi Case (Decision No. 49/Pdt.G/2003/PN.BDG).
Permana RB, Baskoro D and Afriansyah A, ‘Hukum Internasional Made in Garut? Mengkritisi Status Jus Cogens Atas Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Dalam Mandalawangi' (2020) 5 Bina Hukum Lingkungan <https://bhl-jurnal.or.id/index.php/bhl/article/view/130>.
PPID, ‘Indonesia Signs Paris Agreement on Climate Change' (Ministry of Environment and Forestry, 2016) <http://ppid.menlhk.go.id/siaran_pers/browse/299> accessed 20 September 2023.
PT. Langgeng Makmur Sejahtera v. Luhi Torok (Decision No. 18/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Spt).
Put No. 138/PDT/2015/PT. SMR.
Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Banda Aceh Nomor 50/PDT/2014/PT.BNA.
Rajamani L and others, ‘National "Fair Shares” in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions within the Principled Framework of International Environmental Law' (2021) 21 Climate Policy 983 <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2021.1970504>.
Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Statement of Defence <http://climatecasechart.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/non-us-case-documents/2019/20191113_8918_reply.pdf>.
Sembiring ZA and Baihaqie AG, ‘Litigasi Perubahan Iklim Privat Di Indonesia: Prospek Dan Permasalahannya' (2020) 7 Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia <https://jhli.icel.or.id/index.php/jhli/article/view/215>.
Sherman J, ‘Beyond CSR: The Story of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights' in Rae Lindsay and Roger Martella (eds), Corporate Responsibility, Sustainable Business: Environmental, Social, and Governance Frameworks for the 21st Century (Kluwer Law International 2020).
Simanjuntak U, ‘Menyongsong Naiknya Emisi Pasca Pandemi, Aksi Iklim Indonesia Dinilai Sangat Tidak Memadai' (Institute for Essential Services Reform, 2021) <https://iesr.or.id/menyongsong-naiknya-emisi-pasca-pandemi-aksi-iklim-indonesia-dinilai-sangat-tidak-memadai> accessed 20 September 2023.
Spijkers O, ‘Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie) v Royal Dutch Shell' (2021) 5 Chinese Journal of Environmental Law 237 <https://brill.com/view/journals/cjel/5/2/article-p237_7.xml>.
””, ‘The Influence of Climate Litigation on Managing Climate Change Risks: The Pioneering Work of the Netherlands Courts' (2022) 18 Utrecht Law Review 127 <https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.36633/ulr.801/>.
United Nations Environment Programme, ‘Global Climate Litigation Report: 2020 Status Review' (2020) <https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-climate-litigation-report-2020-status-review#:~:text=The UNEP Global Climate Litigation,has occurred around the world>.
Verheyen R and Franke J, ‘Climate Change Litigation: A Reference Area for Liability' in Peter Gailhofer (ed), Corporate Liability for Transboundary Environmental Harm (Springer 2023).
Wibisana AG and Cornelius CM, ‘Climate Change Litigation in Indonesia' in Jolene Lin and Douglas A Kysar (eds), Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific (Cambridge University Press 2020).
Widjajati E, ‘Ganti Rugi Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok Di Indonesia' (2011) 18 Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 97 <http://journal.uii.ac.id/index.php/IUSTUM/article/view/4000>.
Copyright (c) 2024 Iman Prihandono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
