Constitutionality of Recall Regulations for Officials Elected by the House of Representatives
Downloads
Efforts to disrupt the independence of state officials elected by the DPR did not stop at the time of the removal of the Constitutional Judge some time ago, rather the practice was again carried out undemocratically and then legitimized by law, commonly known as autocratic legalism, through the issuance of a revision of the DPR Regulation on Rules of Procedure. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine and analyze supervision from the perspective of administrative law and the constitutionality of DPR RI Regulation No. 1 of 2025. This research is a legal research using a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. This research is important to be carried out so that the implementation of judicial power, especially the Constitutional Court, remains an independent power and can uphold law and justice without intervention from any party. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of recall of state officials elected by the DPR from the perspective of administrative law supervision cannot be justified. In addition, DPR RI Regulation No. 1 of 2025 has the potential to violate the provisions of higher laws and regulations, the theory of the hierarchy of laws and regulations, the theory of independence, the theory of authority, the theory of separation of power, and the Constitutional Court Decision Number 103/PUU-XX/2022.
Ackerman B, ‘The New Separation of Powers’ (2000) 113 Harvard Law Review 633 <https://www.jstor.org/stable/1342286?origin=crossref>.
Agus MA and Alamsyah AMI, “An Analytical Study On The Intervention Of The Legislature To The Constitutional Court In Indonesia Compared To Developed Countries” (2022) 12 Indonesia Law Review.
Agustian T and Salim C, ‘The Problems of the Independence of Judicial Power in Indonesia in a Review of Islamic Law’ (2022) 6 Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 163.
Ali HF dan Muhidin N, Hukum Tata Pemerintahan-Heteronom dan Otonom (Refika Aditama 2012).
Alsyam A, ‘Kewenangan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dalam Penggantian Hakim Konstitusi Yang Berasal Dari Usulannya Dalam Masa Jabatan’ (2024) 6 UNES Law Review 6903.
Anwar B, ‘Rekonstruksi Pengawasan Etik Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara’ (2021) 1 Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam <https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/syariah/Staatsrecht/article/view/2374>.
Arfiani, Putra I dan Fadhila A, ‘Pelanggaran Etik Hakim Konstitusi dan Rekomendasi Penegakan Hukum pada Kasus Pemalsuan Putusan’ (2024) 7 Unes Journal of Swara Justisia.
Aritonang SDP, Safa’at MA and Susmayanti R, ‘Human Rights and Democracy: Can the President’s Constitutional Disobedience Be Used as Grounds for Impeachment?’ (2024) 3 Human Rights in the Global South (HRGS) 1.
Atmosudirdjo P, Hukum Administrasi Negara (Ghalia Indonesia 1981).
Black HC, Black’s Law Dictionary (16th edn, St Paul Minn-West Publishing Co 1991).
Butt S, “Judicial Reasoning and Review in the Indonesian Supreme Court” (2019) 6 Asian Journal of Law and Society.
Carolan E, The New Separation of Powers : A Theory for the Modern State (Oxford University Press 2009) <https://academic.oup.com/book/12777>.
Farabi MFF and Tanaya, ‘Polemik Legalitas Pemecatan Hakim Konstitusi Oleh Lembaga Pengusul: Tinjauan Kasus Pemecatan Hakim Aswanto Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman’ (2023) 2 Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains 294.
Fuad Hassan M and Zulfiani A, ‘Pelanggaran Kode Etik Dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Tindakan Merubah Substansi Putusan Secara Tidak Sah (Studi Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.01/MKMK/T/02/2023)’ (2023) 6 Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 21.
‘Fungsi Legislasi DPR Pasca Amandemen UUD NKRI 1945’ (2020) 10 Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara <https://journal.universitassuryadarma.ac.id/index.php/jihd/article/view/468> accessed 5 June 2025.
H. Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan Mp, ‘Legal Certainty on Impeachment of the President and/or Vice President Judging from the 1945 Constitution’ (2022) 1 East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 1611.
Hong CP and others, ‘Review of the Authority of the House of Representatives in Removing Constitutional Court Judges’ (2023) 2 QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia 768.
Hufron dan Hadi S, Tanggung Gugat Pemerintah dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat (Jejak Pustaka 2022).
Irwansyah dan Yunus A, Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Mirra Buana Media 2020).
Jr WFF, Understanding Administrative Law (Matthew Bender & Company, Inc 2000).
Karya W, ‘Eksekusi Sebagai Mahkota Lembaga Peradilan’ (2023) 4 Jurnal Tana Mana 292.
Koswara P and Megawati M, ‘Analisis Prinsip Independensi Hakim Konstitusi Di Indonesia’ (2023) 3 Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective 47.
Kurnia TS, ‘Recall Aswanto: Tertutupnya Ruang Disagreement Antara Pembentuk Undang-Undang Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi’ (2023) 7 Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 143.
Koesoemahatmadja DH, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Usaha Negara (Alumni 1979).
Koswara P dan Megawati M, “Analisis Prinsip Independensi Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia” (2023) 3 Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective 47 <http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/adlp/article/view/7902>.
Mp HMRP, ‘The Constitutional Court Function of the Indonesian State Concerning System for the Implementation Impeachment of the President and/or Vice President’ (2020) 4 Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist 118.
Muhammad Iqbal N, Randy Aulia N, and M Rafly Ashari, ‘Implementasi Pengawasan Legislatif (Pengawasan Terhadap Kebijakan Infrastruktur Jalan Provinsi Tahun 2020)’ (2022) 8 Moderat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan 303.
Mustafa B, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara (Citra Aditya 1990).
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Kencana Prenada Media Group 2017).
Philipus M.Hadjon and others, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia (cet IX, Gadjah Mada University Press 2005).
Purbopranoto K, Catatan Hukum Tata Pemerintahan dan Peradilan Administrasi Negara (Alumni 1981).
Ramadhan A dan Asril S, “Aswanto Dicopot DPR Gara-gara Batalkan UU, Jimly: Hakim MK Bukan Orang DPR” (Kompas.com, 2022) <https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/10/01/20330441/aswanto-dicopot-dpr-gara-gara-batalkan-uu-jimly-hakim-mk-bukan-orang-dpr>.
Riqiey B and Hadi S, ‘Constitutional Imperatives: Examining the Urgency of Term Limits for Members of the House of Representatives’ (2023) 17 Mimbar Keadilan 1<https://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/mimbarkeadilan/article/view/9635>.
Riqiey B and Huda MA, ‘Interpreting Article 22(2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Post Constitutional Court Decision 54/PUU-XXI/2023’ (2024) 4 Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal 24, <https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ipmhi/article/view/76687>.
Ritonga MW and Harbowo N, ‘Revisi Tatib DPR Buat Ruang Politik Indonesia Berantakan’ (kompas.id, 2025) <https://www.kompas.id/artikel/revisi-tatib-dpr-buat-ruang-politik-indonesia-berantakan>.
Rizkiya Muhlas N, Ali Safa’at M and Dwi Qurbani I, ‘Quo Vadis The Legal Politics Of Filling Constitutional Judge Positions In Indonesia’ (2023) 3 IBLAM LAW REVIEW 23.
Satriawan I and Mokhtar KA, ‘The Role of Indonesian Constitutional Court in Resolving Disputes among the State Organs’ (2019) 5 Hasanuddin Law Review 159.
Shakti AG, Tyas MW and Farid MLR, ‘The Integration of Judicial Review in Indonesia’ (2023) 6 Syiah Kuala Law Journal 212.
Silalahi RAY, ‘Kedudukan Jaksa Agung Dalam Perspektif Independensi Penyelenggara Kekuasaan Kehakiman’ (2024) 7 Transparansi Hukum 22.
Soehino, Asas-asas Hukum Tata Pemerintahan (Liberty 1984).
Sugiman, “Fungsi Legislasi DPR Pasca Amandemen UUD NKRI 1945” (2020) 10 Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara <https://journal.universitassuryadarma.ac.id/index.php/jihd/article/view/468>.
Sutrisna T and Prabowo D, ‘Revisi Tatib DPR Digugat Ke MA, Dianggap Tak Sesuai Fungsi Pengawasan’ (Kompas.com, 2025) <https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/02/24/20004461/revisi-tatib-dpr-digugat-ke-ma-dianggap-tak-sesuai-fungsi-pengawasan?page=all>
Utrecht E, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia (Pustaka Tinta Mas 1986).
W. F P, Inleiding in het Administratefrecht van Indonesia (JB Wolters 1950).
Zaini A and Ridho Moh Z, ‘The Auxiliary State Organ Authorities in Indonesia: The Constitutional Implications of Law No. 19 of 2019 Concerning KPK’ (2023) 27 Potret Pemikiran 185.
Copyright (c) 2025 Baharuddin Riqiey, Muhammad Khatami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
