The management of Monochorionic Monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancy
Downloads
HIGHLIGHTS
- Monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancy has a significant risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality, including intrauterine fetal death (IUFD).
- The risk of prematurity, the risk of death due to MCMA complications, the availability of the NICU, also high costs on preterm care were factors in deciding to terminate the pregnancy.
- The ideal time to deliver monochorionic twins in order to reduce the risks of cord entanglement, growth discrepancies, and intrauterine fetal death is still a point of controversy.
- Early diagnosis, intensive antenatal monitoring, patient and family decision would contribute to antenatal mortality reduction.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To present the management of monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancy.
Case Report: Advanced prenatal treatment has improved the prognosis for Monochorionic Monoamniotic (MCMA) pregnancies; however, there is still no agreement on how to handle MCMA twins. The authors report 2 cases of monoamniotic monochorionic twin pregnancies. In the first case, a 30-years-old primi pregnant woman detected MCMA at 14 weeks of gestation; no complications related to MCMA were found; she planned delivery at 32 weeks, but one of the babies died in the womb at 31/32 weeks pregnant, a live baby born by cesarean section. The second case was a 36-year-old pregnant woman, on her third pregnancy, diagnosed with MCMA after 12 weeks of pregnancy, no complications related to MCMA, the baby was born at 32 weeks pregnant, and both babies survived. The management was the same in both cases, but different outcomes were obtained; in case 1, the baby died allegedly due to cord entanglement, which could not be detected during pregnancy.
Svelato A, Vergatti MC, Rinaldo D, et al. Cord entanglement in a monochorionic-monoamniotic twin pregnancy: A case report. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;154(3):570-1. doi: 10.1002/ijgo. 13780. Epub 2021 Jun 25. PMID: 34101825.
Mieghem TV, Abbasi N, Shinar S, et al. Monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancies Definition and epidemiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;3(4):100520. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf. 2021.100520.
Ozler S, Oztas E, Uygur D, et al. Monoamniotic monokoryonik ikiz sirkumvallat plasenta ve konglomere umbilikal kord. Cukurova Medical Journal (Çukurova Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi Dergisi). 41(18992):604-6. doi: 10.17826/cukmedj. 55644.
Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Khalil A, et al. Prevalence, antenatal management and perinatal outcome of monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: a collaborative multicenter study in England, 2000-2013. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(2):184-92. doi: 10.1002/uog.19114. Epub 2018 Dec 30. PMID: 29900612.
Al Riyami N, Al-Rusheidi A, Al-Khabori M. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic in comparison to dichorionic twin pregnancies. Oman Med J. 2013;28(3):173-7. doi: 10.5001/omj.2013.49. PMID: 23772282; PMCID: PMC3679607.
Morikawa M, Yamada T, Yamada T, et al. Prospective risk of intrauterine fetal death in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012;15(4):522-6. doi: 10.1017/thg.2012.30. PMID: 22853819.
Eserdag S, Zulfikaroglu E, Ozer A. Cord entanglement in monochorionic monoamniotic twins. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2010;111(12):673-5. PMID: 21384739.
Machino H, Iriyama T, Nakayama T. A case of a surviving co-twin diagnosed with porencephaly and renal hypoplasia after a single intrauterine fetal death at 21 weeks of gestation in a monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2017;2017(1):omw096. doi: 10.1093/ omcr/omw096. PMID: 28116109; PMCID: PMC5241712.
Cordero L, Franco A, Joy SD. Monochorionic monoamniotic twins: neonatal outcome. J Perinatol. 2006;26(3):170-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211457. PMID: 16467856.
Aggarwal P, Terhase N. Cord entanglement in monochorionic monoamniotic twins: a case report. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 4(6):2091–2. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog2015 1326.
Murakoshi T, Ishii K, Matsushita M, et al. Monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancies with two yolk sacs may not be a rare finding: a report of two cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36(3):384-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.7710. PMID: 20533442.
Fuchs KM, D'Alton ME. Chorionicity of multiple gestations. In: Obstetric imaging: Fetal diagnosis and care: Second Edition. Elsevier Inc.; 2017. p. 639-641.e1.
Baud D, Windrim R, Van Mieghem T, et al. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a frequently missed diagnosis with important consequences. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(2):205-9. doi: 10.1002/ uog.13328. Epub 2014 Jun 27. PMID: 24549628.
MONOMONO Working Group. Inpatient vs outpatient management and timing of delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: the MONOMONO study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(2):175-83. doi: 10.1002/uog.19179. Epub 2018 Dec 30. PMID: 30019431.
Júnior JE, Félix E, Santana M, et al. Monochorionic twin pregnancy-potential risks and perinatal outcomes. In IntechOpen.; 2015. doi: 10.5772/ 58951.
Lopriore E, Lewi L, Khalil A. Monochorionic twins: A delicate balance. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(10):1711. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101711. PMID: 3162 7398; PMCID: PMC6832893.
Hack KE, van Gemert MJ, Lopriore E, et al. Placental characteristics of monoamniotic twin pregnancies in relation to perinatal outcome. Placenta. 2009;30(1):62-5. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta. 2008.09.016. Epub 2008 Nov 17. PMID: 19010539.
Van Mieghem T, De Heus R, Lewi L, et al. Prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(3):498-506. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000409. PMID: 25162249.
Greimel P, Csapo B, Haeusler M, et al. A modified technique for cord transection in monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;44(3):236-40. doi: 10.1159/000489882. Epub 2018 Aug 8. PMID: 30089297.
Basnet S, Adhikari S, Jha J, et al. Neonatal intensive care unit admissions among preterm babies in a tertiary care centre: A descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022; 60(248):364-8. doi: 10.31729/jnma.7240. PMID: 35633222; PMCID: PMC9252253.
Watson SI, Arulampalam W, Petrou S, et al.; Neonatal Data Analysis Unit and the NESCOP Group. The effects of designation and volume of neonatal care on mortality and morbidity outcomes of very preterm infants in England: retrospective population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(7):e004856. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004856. PMID: 25001393; PMCID: PMC4091399.
Fu M, Song W, Yu G, et al. Risk factors for length of NICU stay of newborns: A systematic review. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1121406. doi: 10.3389/fped .2023.1121406. PMID: 36994438; PMCID: PMC 10040659.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyright of the article is transferred to the journal, by the knowledge of the author, whilst the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
2. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share alike (CC BY-NC-SA), (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
3. The articles published in the journal are open access and can be used for non-commercial purposes. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation
The manuscript authentic and copyright statement submission can be downloaded ON THIS FORM.