Justice Perspective on Agrarian Reform in Realizing People’s Welfare
Downloads
This paper analyzes agrarian reform from the perspective of justice in realizing people’s welfare. The aim of agrarian reform is to organize land management, both in terms of asset management and access for the benefit of the people, so that an interesting legal issue to study in depth is equitable land management. It is necessary to understand that the no. of inequality in land control and ownership creates disparities which are correlated with imbalance. Agrarian reform based on asset management and access is expected to be able to answer the problem of inequality, especially in the object of agrarian reform. This research was conducted using a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Agrarian reform can be interpreted as the government’s efforts to organize assets and community access related to land, which so far has been felt to have a lot of inequality in control and ownership. This arrangement is very important to provide certainty and access to manage assets so that they can provide equitable welfare. Fair land management is part of the state’s constitutional mandate regarding the utilization of agrarian resources for a country’s economy which is structured and aimed at the maximum prosperity of the people. As a benchmark for the success of implementing agrarian reform is the creation of legal certainty regarding land ownership as capital for the welfare of the people with justice.
Book
A.T. M, Menggerakan Dan Membangun Pertanian: Syarat-Syarat Pokok Pembangunan Dan Modernisasi (Yasaguna 1987).
Asshiddqie J, Konstitusi Ekonomi (2010).
Ghimire KB, Land Reform and Peasant Livelihoods: The Scoial Dynamics of Rural Poverty And Agrarian Reform in Developing Countries (ITDG Publishing 2001).
Hatta M, Hukum Tanah Nasional Dalam Perspektif Negara Kesatuan, Hukum Tanah Antara Teori Dan Kenyataan Berkaitan Dengan Kesejahteraan Dan Persatuan Bangsa (media abadi 2005).
Indonesia KKBPR, ‘Pemerintah Dorong Peningkatan Sektor Pangan Dan Pertanian Untuk Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Indonesia’ (Siaran Pers No. HM.4.6/175/SET.M.EKON.2.3/11/2020, 2020).
Limbong B, Konflik Pertanahan (Margaretha Pustaka 2012).
——, Reforma Agraria (Margaretha Pustaka 2012).
Martua, Kemajuan Ekonomi Reforma Agraria Dan Land Reform Di Pedesaan (Analisis Sosiologi Ekonomi Pada Masyarakat Pedesaan Ber-Etnis Dayak Di Kabupaten Landak Dan Pontianak, Provinsi Kalimanatan Barat) (Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian 2010).
Rousseau J., The Social Contract & Discourses (The Project Gutenberg eBook 2014).
Santoso U, Hukum Agraria; Kajian Komprehensif (Prenada Media 2012).
Shohibuddin and Salim MN, Pembentukan Kebijakan Reforma Agraria 2006-2007 Bunga Rampai Perdebatan (Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Negara Press 2012).
Statistik BP, Statistik Indonesia (Statistical Yearbook Of Indonesia) (2022).
Sukarman H and Prasetiya WS, ‘Degradasi Keadilan Agraria Dalam Omnibus Law’ (2021) 9 Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 30.
Usman AH, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Hak Milik Atas Tanah Adat Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria’ (2010) 1 Jurnal Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan 65.
Utomo S, ‘Percepatan Reforma Agraria Untuk Mencapai Keadilan’ (2021) 4 Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 204.
Warriner D, Landreform in Principle and Practice (Coloradon Press 1969).
Journal
Amaliyah A and others, ‘Reforma Agraria Dan Penanganan Sengketa Tanah’ (2021) 5 HERMENEUTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 67.
Angkoso JB, Luthfi AN and Sudibyanung, ‘Distribusi Penguasaan Dan Pemilikan Tanah Pertanian Di Desa Nglegok, Kabupaten Karanganyar’ (2020) 3 Jurnal Tunas Agraria 111.
Aprianto TC, ‘Pelaksanaan Agenda Reforma Agraria Awal Masa Orde Baru (1967-1973)’ (2021) 3 Jurnal Historia 399.
Arisaputra MI, ‘Access Reform Dalam Kerangka Reforma Agraria Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Sosial’ (2016) 21 jurnal perspektif 83.
Bachriadi D, ‘Pandangan Kritis Tentang Program Pembaruan Agraria Nasional (PPAN) Atau Redistribusi Tanah Ala Pemerintah SBY’ (2007) 2 Jurnal Ilmiah Reforma Agraria Untuk Indonesia 12.
Bambang I and Ariningsih E, ‘No TitleDinamika Kebijakan Dan Ketersediaan Lahan Pertanian’ (2015) 2 Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development Repository 14.
Gunawan, ‘RUU Pertanahan: Antara Mandat Dan Pengingkaran Terhadap UUPA 1960’ (2014) 39 BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan 445.
Harris A, Sitepu FY and Andriati SL, ‘Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Dualisme Kepemilikan Hak Guna Bangunan Diatas Hak Pengelolaan Sebagai Aset Pemerintah Kota Medan (Sengketa Tanah Di Kecamatan Medan Petisah)’ (2021) 6 De Lega Lata Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 345.
Hastiyanto F, ‘Perencanaan Pembangunan Dan Gerakan Sosial Dalam Reforma Agraria Di Indonesia’ (2019) 2 Kybernan: Jurnal Studi Kepemerintahan 23.
Junarto R and Djurdjani, ‘Pemetaan Objek Reforma Agraria Dalam Kawasan Hutan (Studi Kasus Di Kabupaten Banyuasin)’ (2020) 6 BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan 224.
Kasworo Y, ‘Reforma Agraria Kini Dan Nanti’ (2019) 7 Jurnal Rechvinding 6.
Martini S, Ash-Shafikh MH and Afif NC, ‘Implementasi Reforma Agraria Terhadap Pemenuhan Harapan Masyarakat Yang Bersengketa Lahan’ (2019) 5 BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan 155.
Nurahmani A, ‘Revitalisasi Kebijakan Reforma Agraria Dalam Rangka Penguatan Hak Perekonomian Rakyat’ (2023) 53 Majalah Hukum Nasional 303.
Salfutra RD and Agustian RA, ‘Alternatif Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria (Suatu Telaah Dalam Perspektif Reforma Agraria Dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan)’, Prosiding Seminar Hukum dan Publikasi Nasional (Serumpun) (2019).
Regulations
The 1945 Constitusionals.
Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles (UUPA).
Copyright (c) 2024 Bhim Prakoso, Iswi Hariyani, Moh. Ali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
