TESTING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CARHART MODEL FOUR FACTORS ON EXCESS RETURNS IN INDONESIA
Downloads
One crucial information for investor in making their investment decision is to estimate asset-pricing level. The basic principle would be high risk, high return. This research is using Carhart model (1997): market return, size, book to market, and momentum. The goal of this research is to test and analyze the influence of Carhart Four Factor Model toward Indonesian stock' excess return.
Dependent variable used in this research is stock' excess return, while independent variable used are Carhart four factor model. Population used is all non-financial firms listed in Bursa Efek Indonesia from year 2010 to 2012. Total samples are 150 firms. To test the model in this research, we firstly create ten portfolio groups by combining size-book to market and size-momentum. We use multiple regression analysis by using 10 regression analysis model based on previously built 10 portfolio combinations.
Statistical test on variable excess market return toward stock return on 10 portfolio shows that there exist positive significant relationship to all models. SMB is significantly impacting portfolio return to 5 models. HML is significantly impacting portfolio return to 6 models. UMD impacting positively significant toward portfolio return on 2 models.
Keywords: stock excess return, Carhart four factor model, market return, size, book to market, momentum.
Banz, Rolf B. 1981. The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stock. Journal of Financial Economic 9: 3-18
Bodie, Zvi., Alex Kane, and Alan J. Marcus. 2011. Investments and Portfolio Management. New York: McGraw-hill
Brealey, Richard A., Stewart C. Myers, and Alan J. Marcus. 2007. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan. Jilid 1. Terjemahan. Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga
Breeden, D.T., Michael R. Gibbons, and Robert H. Litzenberger. 1989. Empirical Test of The Consumption-Oriented CAPM. The Journal of Finance Vol XLIV No. 2
Carhart, Mark M .1997. On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Finance Volume 52: 57-82
Chang, Bo Young., Peter Christoffersen, and Christ jacob. 2009. Market Skewness Risk and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns. McGill University
Dhrymes, Phoebus J. 1984. The Empirical Relevance of Arbitrage Pricing Models. Journal of Portofolio Management 10, No. 4
Fama, Eugene. F. and Kenneth R. French. 1996. Multifactor Explanation of Asset Pricing Anomalies. Journal of Finance Volume 51: 55-84
--------------. 1992. The Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance Vol XLVII No. 2
Foster, George. 1986. Financial Statement Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Harvey, Campbell. R. and Akhtar Siddique. 2000. Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests. Journal of Finance Vol LV No 3: 1263-1296
Jegadeesh, Narashiman & Sheridan Titman. 1993. Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications For Stock market Efficiency. Journal of Finance Volume 48: 65-91
Jones, Charles P. 2002. Investments Analysis And Management. 8th ed. New York: Jhon Willey And Sons Inc.
Jurczenko, Emmanuel. & Bertrand, Maillet. 2001. The Three-moment CAPM: Theoretical Foundations and an Asset Pricing Models Comparison in an Unified Framework.
Khamlichi, Abdelbari El., Mohamed Arouri, and Frederic Teulon. 2014. Persistence of Performance Using the Four-Factor Pricing Model: Evidence from Dow Jones Islamic Index. IPAG Working Papers
Lintner, J. 1965. The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. Revue Of Economics And Statistics, 47: 13-37.
Mossin, J. 1966. Equilibrium in A Capital Asset Market. Econometrica, 37: 768-783.
Mwalla, Mona Al. 2010. Can Book-to-Market, Size and Momentum be Extra Risk Factors that Explain the Stocks Rate Of Return?: Evidence from Emerging Market . Journal of Finance, Accounting and Management, 3(2): 42-57
Novak, Jiri & Dalibor Petr. 2010. CAPM Beta, Size, Book-to-Market, and Momentum in Realized Stock Returns. Journal of Economics and Finance, 60 no. 5: 447-460
Pasaribu, Rowland B.F. 2010. Pemilihan Model Asset pricing. Jurnal Akuntansi dan manajemen Vol. 21 No. 3: 217-306
Prasetiono, Dery Darusman. 2012. Analisis Pengaruh Firm Size, Book To Market Ratio, Price Earning Ratio, Dan Momentum Terhadap Return Portofolio Saham. Diponegoro Journal Of Management Volume 1, Nomor 1, Tahun 2012, Halaman 212-225
Rachman, Aditya. 2012. Pengujian Kekuatan Multifactor Fama and French terhadap Return Portofolio. Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya: Skripsi tidak diterbitkan
Ranaldo, Angelo. & Laurent Favre .2003. How to Price Hedge Funds: From Two- to Four-Moment CAPM
Reinganum, Marc R. 1981. A New Empirical Perspective on The CAPM. Journal Of Financial And Quantitative Analysis. Vol 16, No. 4: 439-462.
Riduwan. 2005. Belajar Mudah Penelitian Untuk Guru, Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung : Alfabeta
Ross, Stephen A. 1976. The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing. Journal of Economic Theory 13, No.2:341-360
Shanken, Jay. 1982. The Arbitrage Pricing Theory: Is It Testable?. Journal of Finance 37, No. 5
Sharpe, W.F. 1964. Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk. Journal Of Finance, 19: 425-442.
Tai, Chu-Sheng. 2003. Are Fama – French and Momentum Factors Really Priced?. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 13: 359-384
Tandelilin, Eduardus. 2010. Portofolio dan Investasi; Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius
Trisnadewi, Mariana. 2012. Analisis Pengaruh Risiko Pasar, Size, Book To Market, Dan Momentum Terhadap Keputusan Investor Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang: Skripsi diterbitkan
Wang, Kevin Q. 2005. Beta and Momentum. University of Toronto. Canada
Copyright notice:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)