Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a Diagnostic Modality for Keratoconus: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
Downloads
Introduction: Keratoconus is a degenerative corneal disorder leading to vision impairment. It is important to detect it early to prevent its progression by corneal cross-linking (CXL). Keratoconus is diagnosed using videokeratography and Scheimpflug tomography, which provide valuable data on the corneal surface. However, distinguishing keratoconus from normal variations remains challenging. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising improvements in detecting subtle corneal changes, enhancing keratoconus detection and diagnosis. Purpose: To analyze AI as a diagnostic modality for keratoconus by calculating the pooled sensitivity and specificity to evaluate its accuracy. Methods: Databases involved PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Embase, and Science Direct, from 2018 to March 2024. Also, to include unpublished works, the grey literature was searched, using the OpenGrey repository. Studies were included when they met the inclusion criteria. Results: We involved a total of 19 studies in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity for detecting keratoconus was 95% confidence interval (CI) (91% to 98%), with a pooled specificity of 98% CI (96% to 99%). Additionally, the random forest model had a pooled sensitivity of 98.11% (CI, 96.77% to 99.44%), with a pooled specificity of 99% (CI, 98.24% to 99.76%). On the other hand, the convolutional neural network (CNN) model had a pooled sensitivity of 89.73% CI (79.77% to 99.69%), with a pooled specificity of 95.27% CI (91.88% to 98.66%). Conclusion: The results confirmed the reliability of different AI models in diagnosing keratoconus, especially the random forest model. This is important, as the early and accurate detection of keratoconus provides opportunities to reduce risk factors and offer treatments, including CXL, which can potentially slow its progression and improve the patient’s quality of life.
Chen X, Zhao J, Iselin KC, Borroni D, Romano D, Gokul A, et al. Keratoconus detection of changes using deep learning of colour-coded maps. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2021;6:e000824. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000824.
Ambrósio R, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, Salomão MQ, Bühren J, Roberts CJ, et al. Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg 2017;33:434–443. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20170426-02.
Issarti I, Consejo A, Jiménez-García M, Hershko S, Koppen C, Rozema JJ. Computer aided diagnosis for suspect keratoconus detection. Comput Biol Med 2019;109:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.024.
Afifah A, Syafira F, Afladhanti PM, Dharmawidiarini D. Artificial intelligence as diagnostic modality for keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2024;19:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.12.007.
Santos VA dos, Schmetterer L, Stegmann H, Pfister M, Messner A, Schmidinger G, et al. CorneaNet: Fast segmentation of cornea OCT scans of healthy and keratoconic eyes using deep learning. Biomed Opt Express 2019;10:622. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.000622.
Kuo BI, Chang WY, Liao TS, Liu FY, Liu HY, Chu HS, et al. Keratoconus screening based on deep learning approach of corneal topography. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2020;9:53. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.53.
Ambrósio R, Machado AP, Leão E, Lyra JMG, Salomão MQ, Esporcatte LGP, et al. Optimized artificial intelligence for enhanced ectasia detection using Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical data. Am J Ophthalmol 2023;251:126–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2022.12.016.
Cao K, Verspoor K, Chan E, Daniell M, Sahebjada S, Baird PN. Machine learning with a reduced dimensionality representation of comprehensive Pentacam tomography parameters to identify subclinical keratoconus. Comput Biol Med 2021;138:104884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104884.
Shanthi S, Aruljyothi L, Balasundaram MB, Janakiraman A, Nirmaladevi K, Pyingkodi M. Artificial intelligence applications in different imaging modalities for corneal topography. Surv Ophthalmol 2022;67:801–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.08.004.
Lu N-J, Koppen C, Hafezi F, Ní Dhubhghaill S, Aslanides IM, Wang Q-M, et al. Combinations of Scheimpflug tomography, ocular coherence tomography and air-puff tonometry improve the detection of keratoconus. Cont Lens Ant Eye 2023;46:101840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2023.101840.
Chen X, Tan Z, Huo Y, Song J, Xu Q, Yang C, et al. Localized corneal biomechanical alteration detected in early keratoconus based on corneal deformation using artificial intelligence. Asia-Pacific J Ophthalmol 2023;12:574–581. https://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000644.
Tan Z, Chen X, Li K, Liu Y, Cao H, Li J, et al. Artificial intelligence–based diagnostic model for detecting keratoconus using videos of corneal force deformation. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2022;11:32. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.9.32.
Abdelmotaal H, Hazarbassanov RM, Salouti R, Nowroozzadeh MH, Taneri S, Al-Timemy AH, et al. Keratoconus detection-based on dynamic corneal deformation videos using deep learning. Ophthalmol Sci 2024;4:100380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2023.100380.
Ferreira-Mendes J, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, Salomão MQ, Rodrigues-Barros S, Ambrósio R. Enhanced ectasia detection using corneal tomography and biomechanics. Am J Ophthalmol 2019;197:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.054.
Kojima T, Nishida T, Nakamura T, Tamaoki A, Hasegawa A, Takagi Y, et al. Keratoconus screening using values derived from auto-keratometer measurements: A multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol 2020;215:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.02.017.
Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R, Wang Y, Zhang F, Zhou X, Bai J, et al. Detection of keratoconus with a new Corvis biomechanical index optimized for Chinese populations. Am J Ophthalmol 2023;252:182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2023.04.002.
Miao YY, Ma XM, Qu ZX, Eliasy A, Wu BW, Xu H, et al. Performance of Corvis ST parameters including updated stress-strain index in differentiating between normal, forme-fruste, subclinical, and clinical keratoconic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2024;258:196–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2023.10.015.
Leão E, Ing Ren T, Lyra JM, Machado A, Koprowski R, Lopes B, et al. Corneal deformation amplitude analysis for keratoconus detection through compensation for intraocular pressure and integration with horizontal thickness profile. Comput Biol Med 2019;109:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.019.
Li X, Luo S, Wang Z, Miao Y, Zhu M, Zheng X, et al. Dynamic topography analysis of the cornea and its application to the diagnosis of keratoconus. Comput Biol Med 2023;158:106800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106800.
Levine H, Tovar A, Cohen AK, Cabrera K, Locatelli E, Galor A, et al. Automated identification and quantification of activated dendritic cells in central cornea using artificial intelligence. Ocul Surf 2023;29:480–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2023.06.001.
Cao K, Verspoor K, Chan E, Daniell M, Sahebjada S, Baird PN. Stratification of keratoconus progression using unsupervised machine learning analysis of tomographical parameters. Intell Based Med 2023;7:100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmed.2023.100095.
Dong R, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Chen Y. The application of corneal biomechanical interocular asymmetry for the diagnosis of keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023;11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1266940.
Schatteburg J, Langenbucher A. Protocol for the diagnosis of keratoconus using convolutional neural networks. PLoS One 2022;17:e0264219. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264219.
Dong R, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Chen Y. The application of corneal biomechanical interocular asymmetry for the diagnosis of keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023;11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1266940.
Schatteburg J, Langenbucher A. Protocol for the diagnosis of keratoconus using convolutional neural networks. PLoS One 2022;17:e0264219. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264219.
Esporcatte LPG, Salomão MQ, Lopes BT, Vinciguerra P, Vinciguerra R, Roberts C, et al. Biomechanical diagnostics of the cornea. Eye and Vision 2020;7:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-0174-x.
Zorto AD, Sharif MS, Wall J, Brahma A, Alzahrani AI, Alalwan N. An innovative approach based on machine learning to evaluate the risk factors importance in diagnosing keratoconus. Inform Med Unlocked 2023;38:101208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101208.
Aljohani SM. A study to create a risk factor models to predict the development of keratoconus among the Saudi Arabian population. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2022;26:7344–7348. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202210_30003.
Jiménez-García M, Issarti I, Kreps E, Ní Dhubhghaill S, Koppen C, Varssano D, et al. Forecasting progressive trends in keratoconus by means of a time delay neural network. J Clin Med 2021;10:3238. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153238.
Salomão MQ, Hofling-Lima AL, Gomes Esporcatte LP, Lopes B, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P, et al. The Role of corneal biomechanics for the evaluation of ectasia patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:2113. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062113.
Vandevenne MM, Favuzza E, Veta M, Lucenteforte E, Berendschot T, Mencucci R, et al. Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014911.
Cao K, Verspoor K, Sahebjada S, Baird PN. Accuracy of machine learning assisted detection of keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2022;11:478. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030478.
Cao K, Verspoor K, Sahebjada S, Baird PN. Evaluating the performance of various machine learning algorithms to detect subclinical keratoconus. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2020;9:24. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.24.
Al-Timemy AH, Alzubaidi L, Mosa ZM, Abdelmotaal H, Ghaeb NH, Lavric A, et al. A deep feature fusion of improved suspected keratoconus detection with deep learning. diagnostics 2023;13:1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101689.
Lu N-J, Elsheikh A, Rozema JJ, Hafezi N, Aslanides IM, Hillen M, et al. Combining spectral-domain OCT and air-puff tonometry analysis to diagnose keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2022;38:374–380. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20220414-02.
Kamiya K, Ayatsuka Y, Kato Y, Fujimura F, Takahashi M, Shoji N, et al. Keratoconus detection using deep learning of colour-coded maps with anterior segment optical coherence tomography: A diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e031313. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031313.
Kamiya K, Ayatsuka Y, Kato Y, Shoji N, Mori Y, Miyata K. Diagnosability of keratoconus using deep learning with Placido disk-based corneal topography. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.724902.
Fassbind B, Langenbucher A, Streich A. Automated cornea diagnosis using deep convolutional neural networks based on cornea topography maps. Sci Rep 2023;13:6566. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33793-w.
Agharezaei Z, Firouzi R, Hassanzadeh S, Zarei-Ghanavati S, Bahaadinbeigy K, Golabpour A, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of keratoconus through VAE-augmented images using deep learning. Sci Rep 2023;13:20586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46903-5.
Abdelmotaal H, Mostafa MM, Mostafa ANR, Mohamed AA, Abdelazeem K. Classification of color-coded Scheimpflug camera corneal tomography images using deep learning. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2020;9:30. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.13.30.
Lopes BT, Ramos IC, Salomão MQ, Guerra FP, Schallhorn SC, Schallhorn JM, et al. Enhanced tomographic assessment to detect corneal ectasia based on artificial intelligence. Am J Ophthalmol 2018;195:223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.005.
Zéboulon P, Debellemanière G, Bouvet M, Gatinel D. Corneal topography raw data classification using a convolutional neural network. Am J Ophthalmol 2020;219:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.005.
Elsawy A, Eleiwa T, Chase C, Ozcan E, Tolba M, Feuer W, et al. Multidisease deeplearning neural network for the diagnosis of corneal diseases. Am J Ophthalmol 2021;226:252–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.01.018.
del Río MS, Trevino JP. Machine learning algorithms for classifying corneas by Zernike descriptors. Intell Based Med 2023;7:100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmed.2022.100081.
Issarti I, Consejo A, Jiménez-García M, Kreps EO, Koppen C, Rozema JJ. Logistic index for keratoconus detection and severity scoring (Logik). Comput Biol Med 2020;122:103809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103809.
Herber R, Pillunat LE, Raiskup F. Development of a classification system based on corneal biomechanical properties using artificial intelligence predicting keratoconus severity. Eye and Vision 2021;8:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00244-4.
Castro-Luna GM, Martínez-Finkelshtein A, Ramos-López D. Robust keratoconus detection with Bayesian network classifier for Placido-based corneal indices. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2020;43:366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2019.12.006.
Bustamante-Arias A, Cheddad A, Jimenez-Perez JC, Rodriguez-Garcia A. Digital image processing and development of machine learning models for the discrimination of corneal pathology: An experimental model. Photonics 2021;8:118. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8040118.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Bulbanat, Ali J. Buabbas, Faisal Aljassar, Yousif Alqabandi, Sayed A. Yousef Alzalzalah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Vision Science and Eye Health Journal by Universitas Airlangga is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
The Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under "the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violations.
