Main Article Content

Abstract

Broken nerves could regenerate when exposed to simple injuries by using a nerve conduit that has appropriate physiological and mechanical ability to support the nerves regeneration around the fissure of trauma. One of the biopolymer for the conduit composition is chitosan because it is biocompatible, biodegradable, non-toxic, and has similarity structure as natural glycosaminoglycans. The aim of research is to synthesize chitosan with variation of Degrees of Deacetylation (DD) and characterize the DD influence on mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Research design is prospective observational. Chitosan was treated with a decrease in the DD method and an increase in the temperature with the strength of alkaline solution, which was NaOH solution with concentrations of 5%, 20%, 35%, and 50% within 2 hours with a heating temperature of 95°C. The results of each DD variation were 23.24, 46.55, 53.48, and 55.06. It was characterized by tensile test with tensile strength values of 0.25 - 1.18 MPa. The degradation test results tend to decrease with the increasing concentration of NaOH proving that samples are biodegradable. The surface morphology of samples shows a pore range of 61.52 μm - 220.3 μm. The best result is the chitosan sample with 35% NaOH because due to the tensile characteristic and a pore in accordance with normal standard. Tensile strength is around 0.41 MPa - 3.69 MPa and pore size around 40 μm – 250 μm to accelerate nerve regeneration. The results are expected to provide alternative solution of nerve conduit development for peripheral nerve defects.

Keywords

nerve conduit chitosan biodegradable degrees of deacetylation

Article Details

How to Cite
Qulub, F., Widiyanti, P., Maulida, H. N., Indrio, L. W., & Wijayanti, T. R. (2017). EFFECT OF DEACETYLATION DEGREES VARIATION ON CHITOSAN NERVE CONDUIT FOR PERIPHERAL NERVE REGENERATION. Folia Medica Indonesiana, 53(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.20473/fmi.v53i2.6344

References

  1. Schlosshauer B, Dreesmann L, Schaller HE, et al (2006). Synthetic nerve guide implants in humans: a comprehensive survey. Neurosurgery 59, 740–747 (discussion 747–748)
  2. Den Dünnen WFA, Schakenraad JM, Zondervan GJ, et al (1993). A new PLLA/PCL copolymer for nerve regeneration. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine (4), 521 -525
  3. Deumens R, Bozkurt A, Meek MF, et al (2010). Repairing injured peripheral nerves: Bridging the gap. 2010 Nov, Vol 92 (3), 245-76. doi: 10.1016/j.pneuro-bio. 2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Oct 13
  4. Freier T, Koh HS, Kazazian K, et al (2005). Controlling cell adhesion and degradation of chitosan films by N-acetylation. Biomaterials 2005; 26:5872e8
  5. IJkema-Paassen J, Meek MF, Gramsbergen A (2005). Long-term reinnervation effect after sciatic nerve lesions in adult rat Vol 187 (2), 113-120
  6. Jianchun L, Yinghui Z, Yandao G, et al (1999). Chitosan conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration, 4(3)
  7. Khan TA, Peh KK, and Chang, H.S (2002). Reporting Degree of deacetylation values of chitosan; The influence of analytical methods. J. Pharm. Sci Vol 5 (3), 205-212
  8. Apriani L, Iskandar GM, Said M (2012). Pengaruh variasi konsentrasi naoh terhadap nilai derajat deasetilasi pada pembuatan chitosan dari cangkang kulit kepiting. The Journal of Chemistry Engineering Vol 1 (18), 35
  9. Lee J, Leng Y, Chow K, et al (2011). Cell culture medium as an alternative to conventional simulated body fluid. Acta Biomaterialia Vol 7, 2615-22 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.034
  10. Simoes MJ, Gartner A, Shirosaki Y, et al (2011). In vitro and in vivo chitosan membranes testing for peripheral nerve reconstruction. Acta Med Port Vol 24: 43e52
  11. Spielmann H, Hoffmann S, Botham P, et al (2007). The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: Report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the skin integrity function test. Germany, ATLA
  12. Suhardi (1997). Chitin dan khitosan, pusat antar universitas pangan dan gizi. PAU. Thesis, Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta.
  13. Wang A, Ao Q, Wei Y, et al (2007). Physical properties and biocompatibility of a porous chitosan-based fiber-reinforced conduit for nerve regeneration. Biotechno-logy Letters Vol 29 (11), 1697-1702
  14. www.bps.go.id. Accessed July 22, 2015
  15. Yang Y, Gu X, Tan R, et al (2004). Fabrication and properties of a porous chitin/chitosan conduit for nerve regeneration. Biotechnology Letters Vol 26 (23), 1793-1797
  16. Yuan Y, Zhang P, Yang Y, et al (2004). The interaction of Schwann cells with chitosan membranes and fibers in vitro. Biomaterials, 25