DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i2.4771

PENERAPAN AJARAN TURUTSERTA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

Basir Rohrohmana

Abstract


Judgment of the Corruption Court at the First Class Court of Jayapura Number 05/Pid.Sus-TPK/2015/ PN. Jap, and (2) Decision Number 06/Pid.Sus-TPK/2015/PN. Jap, Both Shows the application of participatory teaching, both in the indictment, the prosecution of the prosecutor, as well as the basis of the judge's consideration of the decision of the defendant. There are 2 (two) findings to be disclosed in the analysis of this verdict (1) the concerted teachings applied apparently in their application are within separate prosecution areas between the two indictments, thereby treating the participants in the Doctrine participating equally with the independent offender, Even impressed as a convergence offense, (2) with the prosecution of the indictment, the prosecutor and judge in applying the teachings participating in these two decisions tend to be restrictive in view that the offender is compared to the dader not as part of the unity of the maker (verzamen term) In which there are qualities of participants who can be distinguished betweenpleger, doenpleger, medepleger, uitlokker atau medeplichtigheid.


Keywords


Criminal Corruption; Konvergensi; Pleger; Doenpleger; Medepleger.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

A.Z. Abidin dan Andi Hamzah, Pengantar Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia (PT Yasir Watampone 2010).

Arief BN, Sari Kuliah Hukum Pidana Lanjut (Badan Penyediaan Bahan Kuliah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro 2007).

E.Utrecht, Rangkaian Sari Kuliah Hukum Pidana II (Pustaka Tinta Mas 2000).

Hari Sasangka, Penuntutan Dan Teknik Membuat Surat Dakwaan (Pustaka Tinta Mas 1988).

Jan Rummelink, Hukum Pidana, Komentar Atas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting Dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda Dan Padanannya Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Trustam Pascal Moeliono ed, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama 2003).

Muhammad Ainul Syamsu, Pergeseran Turut serta Melakukan Dalam Ajaran Penyertaan, Telaah Kritis Berdasarkan Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana (Prenadamedia Group 2014).

Satochid Kartanegara, Hukum Pidana Kumpulan Kuliah Bagian Satu (Balai Lektur Mahasiswa).

Jurnal

Basuki Nur Minarno, ‘Proses Penanganan Perkara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Tinj. Hukum Acara “Khusus” Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi)’ (2002) 17 Yuridika.

——, ‘Pembuktian Gratifikasi Dan Suap Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi’ (2005) 20 Yuridika.

Yonna B. Salamor, ‘Analisis Yuridis Ajaran Turut Serta Dalam Kasus Abortus Provocatus Dengan Alasan Kegagalan Kontrasepsi’ (2014) 20 Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura Ambon ‘SASI’.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Yuridika

Creative Commons License

Yuridika (ISSN: 0215-840X | e-ISSN: 2528-3103) by http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/YDK/index under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Yuridika has been indexed by:

Yuridika Official Partner :

 

Full Indexed Service