Editorial Policies

FOCUS AND SCOPE

The scope of the journal Yuridika concerns dogmatic legal research. Yuridika offers a refereed, independent, and innovative forum for jurists, both academic jurists, and practitioners. Yuridika publishes only original articles from a wide variety of legal disciplinary perspectives concerning issues in Indonesian and international law, with a focus on emerging countries. These may include but are not limited to various fields such as criminal law, civil law, constitutional law, administrative law, international law, and Islamic law.

SECTION POLICIES

Criminal Law

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Civil Law

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Constitutional Law

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Administrative Law

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

International Law

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Islamic Law

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

All manuscripts received by YURIDIKA Journal will be peer-reviewed by at least two reviewers within the framework of the Double-Blind Peer Preview Process policy by Open Journal System (OJS). In each manuscript, the peer reviewer will be rated on the substantial and technical aspects based, such as the originality, contribution to the field of the scientific area, and the coherence of the analysis and result. The final decision on the acceptability, or otherwise, of manuscripts will be taken by the editor-in-chief based on reviewers' comments presented during an editorial board meeting. Scanning for instances of plagiarism present in manuscripts will be conducted by means of Turnitin software. The manuscript review process usually takes (on average) 4 weeks but sometimes depend on revision from reviewer.

PUBLICATION FREQUENCY

Published 3 times a year : January, May, September

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

ARCHIVING

This journal utilizes CLOCKSS systems to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration..

ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGES

Yuridika is an open-access journal, all its articles are freely available online. In order to cover editorial process, web hosting, online tools, and indexing services we will charge IDR 0 for publication fee (FREE), but the author should check the grammar of the article through a proofreading institution recommended by the Judicial Editor at his own expense.

for further information please contact us: the Editorial Board.

PLAGIARISM CHECK

Plagiarism screening will be conducted by Yuridika Editorial Board using Turnitin plagiarism.

PUBLICATION ETHICS

The editorial board of the journal Yuridika uses double-blind peer reviews to decide on whether publishing a manuscript. This journal is available in print and online and highly respects the ethics of publication and avoids any type of plagiarism. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor in chief, the editorial board, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Universitas Airlangga). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal of Yuridika is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.

As the publisher of Yuridika, Universitas Airlangga takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical behavior and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensure that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, and Editorial Board will assist in all the communication with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editorial board of Yuridika is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

The editorial board evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editorial board and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript cannot be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The peer review assists the editorial board in making editorial decisions. Through communication with the author, the editorial board may assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

======================

Editor-in-Chief
Yuridika.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga.

INDEXING AND ABSTRACTING

Yuridika has been indexed by: