Peranan Pondasi Moral dalam Menjelaskan Seksisme
Downloads
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peranan pondasi care/harm, fairness/cheating, authority/subversion, dan purity/sanctity dalam teori pondasi moral untuk menjelaskan hostile dan benevolent sexism. Pondasi moral didefinisikan sebagai teori untuk memahami moralitas berdasarkan kelima pondasi dasar dan seksisme ambivalen didefinisikan sebagai sikap seksisme yang memiliki dua wajah yang berbeda, hostile dan benevolent sexism. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode survei dengan kuesioner online kepada partisipan dengan kriteria yang telah ditentukan. Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah moral foundation questionnaires dan ambivalent sexism inventory. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan analisis regresi linear dengan bantuan program Jamovi. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa hanya pondasi authority/subversion dan purity/sanctity yang menjelaskan hostile sexism secara substansial, dan pondasi fairness/cheating, authority/subversion, dan purity/sanctity yang menjelaskan benevolent sexism secara substansial.
Abdullah, N., & Osman, M. N. M. (2018). Islamisation in the Indonesian media spaces new sites for a conservative push. Journal of Religious and Political Practice, 4(3), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/20566093.2018.1525894
Babic, A., & Hansez, I. (2021). The Glass Ceiling for Women Managers: Antecedents and Consequences for Work-Family Interface and Well-Being at Work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618250
Becker, J. C., Zawadzki, M. J., & Shields, S. A. (2014). Confronting and Reducing Sexism: A Call for Research on Intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12081
Blackstone, A. M. (2003). Gender Roles and Society. 335.
Bongiorno, R., Langbroek, C., Bain, P. G., Ting, M., & Ryan, M. K. (2020). Why Women Are Blamed for Being Sexually Harassed: The Effects of Empathy for Female Victims and Male Perpetrators. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319868730
Chan, J., & Haslam, N. (2019). Broad concepts of sexism predict polarized moral judgments of victims and perpetrators. Personality and Individual Differences, 150, 109488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.031
De Judicibus, M., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Blaming the Target of Sexual Harassment: Impact of Gender Role, Sexist Attitudes, and Work Role. Sex Roles, 44(7), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011926027920
Dewi, D. M. (2019). The Representation of Patriarchy in Indonesian Children Folk Tales from Sumatra Island. Lingua Cultura, 13(3), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i3.5646
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (2001). An Ambivalent Alliance: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism as Complementary Justifications for Gender Inequality. The American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: Measuring Ambivalent Sexist Attitudes Toward Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Chapter Two - Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the Moral Domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Pantheon Books.
Hantoro, J. (2019, February 10). Kasus Agni UGM, Korban Disalahkan Hingga Depresi. Tempo. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1174054/kasus-agni-ugm-korban-disalahkan-hingga-depresi
Harper, C. A., & Harris, A. J. (2017). Applying moral foundations theory to understanding public views of sexual offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1217086
Heywood, A. (2017). Political Ideologies: An Introduction.
Krissetyanti, E. P. L. (2018). Women's Perceptions about Glass Ceiling in their Career Development in Local Bureaucracy in Indonesia. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, 25(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v25i1.9643
Liputan6.com. (2021, May 9). Komnas Perempuan: Pertanyaan Seksis di Tes Wawasan Kebangsaan KPK Tunjukan Rendahnya Perspektif Gender. liputan6.com. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/4554192/komnas-perempuan-pertanyaan-seksis-di-tes-wawasan-kebangsaan-kpk-tunjukan-rendahnya-perspektif-gender
McPherson, R. (2019). The Influence of Spirituality, Moral Reasoning, and Personality Factors on Misogyny. The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal, 10(2). https://stars.library.ucf.edu/urj/vol10/iss2/5
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson Education Limited.
O'neil, J. M. (1981). Patterns of Gender Role Conflict and Strain: Sexism and Fear of Femininity in Men's Lives. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 60(4), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4918.1981.tb00282.x
Poerwandari, E. K., Utami, C. P., & Primasari, I. (2019). Ambivalent sexism and sexual objectification of women as predictors of rape myth acceptance among male college students in Greater Jakarta. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00500-w
Ramiro, T., Ramiro, M., Bermúdez, M., & Buela-Casal, G. (2018). Sexism in Adolescent Relationships: A Systematic Review. Psychosocial Intervention, 27, 000–000. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2018a19
Rokhimah, S. (2015). PATRIARKHISME DAN KETIDAKADILAN GENDER | MUWAZAH: Jurnal Kajian Gender. http://e-journal.iainpekalongan.ac.id/index.php/Muwazah/article/view/440
Setiawan, R. (2020). Komentator Liga 1 Cabul dan Kurang Ajar kepada Suporter Perempuan. tirto.id. https://tirto.id/komentator-liga-1-cabul-dan-kurang-ajar-kepada-suporter-perempuan-eD3K
Uzendoorn, M. H. van. (1990). The relation of moral judgement to authoritarianism, sexism, ethnocentrism, and concern about nuclear war. Journal of Moral Education, 19(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724900190105
Vecina, M. L., & Chacón, J. C. (2019). The Extreme Moral Diversity of Men Convicted of Violence Against Their Partners: Four Profiles Based on the Five Moral Foundations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 0886260519835005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519835005
Vecina, M. L., & Piñuela, R. (2017). Relationships between Ambivalent Sexism and the Five Moral Foundations in Domestic Violence: Is it a Matter of Fairness and Authority? The Journal of Psychology, 151(3), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2017.1289145
BRPKM is a periodical publication with open access to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Therfore, the copyright remains with the author.
With this license, anyone has the right to use the information and to re-distribute the content contained in this journal for any purpose, including commercial purposes. It can be done as long as it fulfills two conditions, namely; (1) you shall provide attribution by citing the original link source, and state if any changes have been made; and (2) you may not use any legal provisions or technological means of control that can legally restrict others from doing the things that are permitted by this license.
Journal editors will not ask the author to approve the transfer of copyright on all published manuscripts.
