Peranan Pondasi Moral dalam Menjelaskan Seksisme
Unduhan
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peranan pondasi care/harm, fairness/cheating, authority/subversion, dan purity/sanctity dalam teori pondasi moral untuk menjelaskan hostile dan benevolent sexism. Pondasi moral didefinisikan sebagai teori untuk memahami moralitas berdasarkan kelima pondasi dasar dan seksisme ambivalen didefinisikan sebagai sikap seksisme yang memiliki dua wajah yang berbeda, hostile dan benevolent sexism. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode survei dengan kuesioner online kepada partisipan dengan kriteria yang telah ditentukan. Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah moral foundation questionnaires dan ambivalent sexism inventory. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan analisis regresi linear dengan bantuan program Jamovi. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa hanya pondasi authority/subversion dan purity/sanctity yang menjelaskan hostile sexism secara substansial, dan pondasi fairness/cheating, authority/subversion, dan purity/sanctity yang menjelaskan benevolent sexism secara substansial.
Abdullah, N., & Osman, M. N. M. (2018). Islamisation in the Indonesian media spaces new sites for a conservative push. Journal of Religious and Political Practice, 4(3), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/20566093.2018.1525894
Babic, A., & Hansez, I. (2021). The Glass Ceiling for Women Managers: Antecedents and Consequences for Work-Family Interface and Well-Being at Work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618250
Becker, J. C., Zawadzki, M. J., & Shields, S. A. (2014). Confronting and Reducing Sexism: A Call for Research on Intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12081
Blackstone, A. M. (2003). Gender Roles and Society. 335.
Bongiorno, R., Langbroek, C., Bain, P. G., Ting, M., & Ryan, M. K. (2020). Why Women Are Blamed for Being Sexually Harassed: The Effects of Empathy for Female Victims and Male Perpetrators. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319868730
Chan, J., & Haslam, N. (2019). Broad concepts of sexism predict polarized moral judgments of victims and perpetrators. Personality and Individual Differences, 150, 109488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.031
De Judicibus, M., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Blaming the Target of Sexual Harassment: Impact of Gender Role, Sexist Attitudes, and Work Role. Sex Roles, 44(7), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011926027920
Dewi, D. M. (2019). The Representation of Patriarchy in Indonesian Children Folk Tales from Sumatra Island. Lingua Cultura, 13(3), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i3.5646
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (2001). An Ambivalent Alliance: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism as Complementary Justifications for Gender Inequality. The American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: Measuring Ambivalent Sexist Attitudes Toward Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Chapter Two - Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the Moral Domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Pantheon Books.
Hantoro, J. (2019, February 10). Kasus Agni UGM, Korban Disalahkan Hingga Depresi. Tempo. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1174054/kasus-agni-ugm-korban-disalahkan-hingga-depresi
Harper, C. A., & Harris, A. J. (2017). Applying moral foundations theory to understanding public views of sexual offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1217086
Heywood, A. (2017). Political Ideologies: An Introduction.
Krissetyanti, E. P. L. (2018). Women's Perceptions about Glass Ceiling in their Career Development in Local Bureaucracy in Indonesia. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, 25(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v25i1.9643
Liputan6.com. (2021, May 9). Komnas Perempuan: Pertanyaan Seksis di Tes Wawasan Kebangsaan KPK Tunjukan Rendahnya Perspektif Gender. liputan6.com. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/4554192/komnas-perempuan-pertanyaan-seksis-di-tes-wawasan-kebangsaan-kpk-tunjukan-rendahnya-perspektif-gender
McPherson, R. (2019). The Influence of Spirituality, Moral Reasoning, and Personality Factors on Misogyny. The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal, 10(2). https://stars.library.ucf.edu/urj/vol10/iss2/5
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson Education Limited.
O'neil, J. M. (1981). Patterns of Gender Role Conflict and Strain: Sexism and Fear of Femininity in Men's Lives. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 60(4), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4918.1981.tb00282.x
Poerwandari, E. K., Utami, C. P., & Primasari, I. (2019). Ambivalent sexism and sexual objectification of women as predictors of rape myth acceptance among male college students in Greater Jakarta. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00500-w
Ramiro, T., Ramiro, M., Bermúdez, M., & Buela-Casal, G. (2018). Sexism in Adolescent Relationships: A Systematic Review. Psychosocial Intervention, 27, 000–000. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2018a19
Rokhimah, S. (2015). PATRIARKHISME DAN KETIDAKADILAN GENDER | MUWAZAH: Jurnal Kajian Gender. http://e-journal.iainpekalongan.ac.id/index.php/Muwazah/article/view/440
Setiawan, R. (2020). Komentator Liga 1 Cabul dan Kurang Ajar kepada Suporter Perempuan. tirto.id. https://tirto.id/komentator-liga-1-cabul-dan-kurang-ajar-kepada-suporter-perempuan-eD3K
Uzendoorn, M. H. van. (1990). The relation of moral judgement to authoritarianism, sexism, ethnocentrism, and concern about nuclear war. Journal of Moral Education, 19(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724900190105
Vecina, M. L., & Chacón, J. C. (2019). The Extreme Moral Diversity of Men Convicted of Violence Against Their Partners: Four Profiles Based on the Five Moral Foundations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 0886260519835005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519835005
Vecina, M. L., & Piñuela, R. (2017). Relationships between Ambivalent Sexism and the Five Moral Foundations in Domestic Violence: Is it a Matter of Fairness and Authority? The Journal of Psychology, 151(3), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2017.1289145
BRPKM adalah terbitan berkala dengan akses terbuka Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) sehingga hak cipta tetap berada di tangan penulis.
Dengan lisensi ini, siapapun berhak menggunakan informasi dan melakukan re-distribusi konten yang dimuat dalam jurnal ini untuk kepentingan apapun, termasuk kepentingan komersial. Hal tersebut dapat dilakukan selama memenuhi dua kondisi, yaitu; (1) anda harus memberikan atribusi dengan mengutip sumber tautan aslinya, dan menyatakan apabila ada perubahan yang dilakukan; dan (2) anda tidak dapat menggunakan ketentuan hukum atau sarana kontrol teknologi yang secara hukum dapat membatasi orang lain untuk melakukan hal-hal yang diizinkan oleh lisensi ini.
Redaksi jurnal tidak akan meminta penulis untuk melakukan persetujuan transfer hak cipta atas semua naskah yang diterbitkan.
