Hubungan antara Career Adaptability dengan Subjective Well-Being pada Emerging Adult
Downloads
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat hubungan antara career adaptability dengan subjective well-being pada emerging adult. Penelitian dilakukan pada 141 partisipan, yang terdiri atas 33 laki-laki dan 108 perempuan dari usia 18-25 tahun. Desain penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan metode penelitian survei dengan jenis cross-sectional study. Alat ukur kuesioner yang digunakan untuk career adaptability adalah CAAS-Indonesia dan untuk subjective well-being menggunakan SWLS dan PANAS. Peneliti menggunakan teknik analisis data dengan uji korelasi Pearson's Product Moment. Hasil temuan pada penelitian ini adalah terdapat hubungan yang signifikan dan positif antara career adaptability dengan subjective well-being, yang artinya semakin tinggi tingkat kemampuan career adaptability yang dimiliki pada diri individu, maka semakin tinggi tingkat subjective well-being individu.
Akhtar, H. (2019). Evaluasi properti psikometris dan perbandingan model pengukuran konstruk subjective well-being. Jurnal Psikologi, 18(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.18.1.29-40
Arnett, J. J. (2014). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press.
Arnett, J. J., & Fishel, E. (2013). When will my grown-up kid grow up?: Loving and understanding your emerging adult. Workman Pub.
Azwar, S. (2005). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Pustaka Belajar.
Brulé, G., & Maggino, F. (2017). Towards More Complexity in Subjective Well-Being Studies. In G. Brulé & F. Maggino (Eds.), Metrics of Subjective Well-Being: Limits and Improvements (pp. 1–17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61810-4_1
De Neve, J.-E., Diener, E., Tay, L., & Xuereb, C. (2013). The Objective Benefits of Subjective Well-Being. World Happiness Report 2013. New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00415
Ginevra, M. C. (2018). The role of career adaptability and courage on life satisfaction in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 62(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.11.002.
Hall, D. T. (2002). Careers in and out of organizations. Sage.
Heller, D., Judge, T. A., & Watson, D. (2002). The confounding role of personality and trait affectivity in the relationship between job and life satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(7), 815–835. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.168
Jebb, A. T., Morrison, M., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2020). Subjective well-being around the world: Trends and predictors across the life span. Psychological Science, 31(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619898826
Kırdök, O., & Bölükbaşı, A. (2018 The role of senior university students' career adaptability in predicting their subjective well-being. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(5), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i5.3010
Koen, J., & Klehe, U.-C. (2010). Job-search strategies and reemployment quality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.02.004
Konstam, V., Celen-Demirtas, S., Tomek, S., & Sweeney, K. (2015). Career Adaptability and Subjective Well-Being in Unemployed Emerging Adults: A Promising and Cautionary Tale. Journal of Career Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845315575151
Maddux, J. E. (Ed.). (2018). Subjective well-being and life satisfaction. Routledge.
Maggiori, C., Johnston, C. S., Krings, F., Massoudi, K., & Rossier, J. (2013). The role of career adaptability and work conditions on general and professional well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 437–449. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.jvb.2013.07.001
Marcionetti, J., & Rossier, J. (2019). A Longitudinal Study of Relations Among Adolescents' Self-Esteem, General Self-Efficacy, Career Adaptability, and Life Satisfaction. 16.
Morrison, R. F., & Hall, D. T. (2002). Career Adaptability. Sage.
Peterson, S. J., Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Psychological Capital and Employee Performance: A Latent Growth Modeling Approach. 427–450.
Rottinghaus, P. J. (2005). The career futures inventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072704270271
Santilli, S., Marcionetti, J., Rochat, S., Rossier, J., & Nota, L. (2016). Career Adaptability, Hope, Optimism, and Life Satisfaction in Italian and Swiss Adolescents. Journal of Career Development, 44(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316633793
Savickas, M. L., & Profeli, E. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13.
Soresi, S. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale-Italian Form: Psychometric properties and relationships to breadth of interests, quality of life, and perceived barriers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.020
Sulistiani, W., Suminar, D. R., & Hendriani, W. (2018). The career adapt-abilities scale- indonesian form: psychometric properties and construct validity. Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Education, 4(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2018.4201
Takao, M., & Ishiyama, N. (2021). Effect of career adaptability on subjective well-being of middle-aged and older employees. Sustainability, 13(5), 2570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052570
Trzcinski, E., & Holst, E. (2008). Subjective well-being among young people in transition to adulthood. Social Indicators Research, 87(1), 83–109.
Yang, X., Feng, Y., & Qiu, Y. (2019). Career Adaptability, Work Engagement, and Employee Well-Being Among Chinese Employees: The Role of Guanxi. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 10, 1029. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01029
Copyright (c) 2022 Dyah Ratri Adyatma Mudijatmoko, Rosatyani Puspita Adiati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
BRPKM is a periodical publication with open access to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Therfore, the copyright remains with the author.
With this license, anyone has the right to use the information and to re-distribute the content contained in this journal for any purpose, including commercial purposes. It can be done as long as it fulfills two conditions, namely; (1) you shall provide attribution by citing the original link source, and state if any changes have been made; and (2) you may not use any legal provisions or technological means of control that can legally restrict others from doing the things that are permitted by this license.
Journal editors will not ask the author to approve the transfer of copyright on all published manuscripts.
