Perbedaan daya antiglukan NaOCl 2,5% dan ekstrak kulit manggis (Garcinia mangostana L.) 0,09% terhadap Enterococcus faecalis (Comparison of antiglucan activity between NaOCl 2.5% and mangosteen pericarp extract (Garcinia mangostana Linn) 0.09% against Enterococcus faecalis)
Downloads
Background. Failure of endodontic treatment is commonly caused by the persistent microorganisms remaining in the root canal such as Enterococcus faecalis. Enterococcus faecalis can form a biofilm in tough environmental conditions within the root canals and caused biofilm-mediated infections which needs more complicated treatment due to the increasing of antimicrobial resistance. The biofilm formation initial and most important step is bacteria adherence to the solid surface that is mediated by glucan. NaOCl 2.5% is a commonly used root canal medicaments but can cause injury of periapical tissue. Mangosteen pericarp extract contains flavonoid, tannin, and xanthone have mechanism for inhibiting adherence of bacterial biofilm. Difference of antibacterial activity between NaOCl 2.5% and mangosteen pericarp extract 0.09% can be determined by experimental laboratory to determine the adherence of bacteria in each treatment. Purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the difference of antiglucan activity between NaOCl 2.5% and mangosteen pericarp extract 0.09% on Enterococcus faecalis. Method. This study was designed as an experimental laboratory study with post test only control group design using Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. Mangosteen pericarp was extracted using maceration method. Adherence analysis was observed after 24 hours by examining the viable cells in suspension. These viable cells are measured by UV-Vis spectrophotometer to compare the suspensions' turbidity. Using the Independent T-Test, significantly less bacteria were found adhering to the mangosteen pericarp extract. Results. Absorbancy difference level by mangosteen pericarp extract 0.09% is significantly greater than the NaOCl 2.5% (p<0.05). Conclusion. Antiglucan activity that generated by mangosteen pericarp extract 0.09% is greater than NaOCl 2.5%
Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Besson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: Its Role in Root Canal Treatment Failure and Current Concepts in Retreatment. JOE. 2006; 32 (2): 93-98
Sun J, Sundsfjord A, Song X. Enterococcus faecalis from patients with chronic periodontitis: virulence and antimicrobial resistance traits and determinants. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012; 31: 267-272.
Paes Leme AF, Koo H, Bellato CM, Bedi G, Cury JA. The Role of Sucrose in Cariogenic Dental Biofilm Formation – New Insight. J Dent Res. 2006; 85(10): 878-887
Spencer HR, Ike V, Brennan PA. Review: the use of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics – potential complications and their management. British Dental Journal. 2007. 202 (9): 555-559
Poeloengan M, Praptiwi. ‘Uji Aktivitas Antibakteri Ekstrak Kulit Buah Manggis (Garcinia mangostana Linn.)'. Media Litbang Kesehatan. 2010; 20 (2): 66-67.
Pleszczyńska M, Wiater A, Janczarek M, Szczodrak J. (1→ 3)-α-D-Glucanhydrolases in dental biofilm prevention and control: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2015; 79: 761-78
Liu H, Wei X, Ling J, Wang W, Huang X. Biofilm formation capability of Enterococcus faecalis cells in starvation phase and its susceptibility to sodium hypovhlorite. Journal of Endodontics. 2010; 36(4): 630-635
Torrungruang K, Vichienroj P, Chutimaworapan S. Antibacterial activity of mangosteen pericarp extract against cariogenic Streptococcus mutans. CU Dent J. 2007; 30: 1-10
Nguyen PTM, Falsetta ML, Hwang G, Gonzalez-Begne M, Koo H. α-mangostin disrupts the development of Streptococcus mutans biofilms and facilitates its mechanical removal. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10)
Gregoire S, Singh AP, Vorsa N, Koo H. Influence of cranberry phenolics on glucan synthesis by glucosyltransferases and Streptococcus mutans acidogenicity. J Appl Microbiol. 2007; 103(5): 1960-8
Zarena AS, Sankar U. Phenolic acids, flavonoid profile and antioxidant activity in mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) pericarp. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 2011; 36(5): 627-633
Scalbert A. Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry. 1991; 30(12): 3875-3883
Kakiuchi N, Hattori M, Nishizawa M, Yamagishi T, Okuda T, Namba T. Studies on dental caries prevention by traditional medicines (Inhibitory effect of various tannins on glucan snthesis by glucosyltransferase from Streptococccus mutans). Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 1986; 34(2): 720-5
Donlan RM. 2011. Biofilm Elimination on Intravascular Catheters: Important Considerations for the Infectious Disease Practicioner, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta:Oxford University Press. P. 1043
Zahed M, Yazd I. Sodium hypochlorite on endodontics: an update review. International Dental Journal. 2008; 58: 329-341
CDJ by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
