The differences between mangosteen peel extract irrigant and NaOCl 2.5% on root canal cleanliness
Downloads
Background: Preparation, one of the stages in root canal treatment, always producesdebrisas aresultof instrumentation onroot canalwalls. Debrisconsistsoforganicand inorganicmaterials. Irrigation need to be performed in every preparation so that debrisandmicroorganisms can be removed from root canal wallsthrough flushingmechanism. NaOCl 2.5% is the most popular irrigant used in root canal treatment. However, NaOCl2.5% onlyworks onorganic tissue. Mangosteenpeel extractcontainsvariousactive compounds, such as saponin. Saponin acts assurfactantso as tolower thesurface tension and remove debris from the root canalwalls. Purpose: to compare the cleanliness of root canal walls following irrigation with NaOCl 2.5% and mangosteen peel extract. Method: Eighteen mandible premolar extracted for orthodontics necessity were used in this study. The teeth were divided into three groups, in which each group consists of six teeth. All of them were instrumented with ProTaper for Hand Use and irrigated. Group 1 used aquadest as irrigant, group 2 used NaOCl 2,5%, and group 3 used mangosteen peel extract 400 ug/ml. The roots were split longitudinally into halves and in 1/3 of apex. The surface of the canal walls were examined using scanning electron microscope. Photomicrographs were scored by three independent observers and statistically tested. Result: There were significant differences between three groups (p<0.05). Group 3, irrigated with mangosteen peel extract 400 ug/ml, had the smallest median score that was 1. Conclusion: Mangosteen peel extract is moreeffective thanNaOCl 2.5% incleaningroot canalwall from debris.
Carrotte P 2004, ‘Practice Endodontics: Part 7 Preparing the root canal', British Dental Journal, Vol. 197, No. 10, pp. 603-613
Hulsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH 2005, ‘Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means', Endodontic Topics, Vol. 10, pp. 30–76
Zehnder M 2006, ‘Root Canal Irrigants', Journal of Endodontic, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 389-398
Torabinejad M 2011, 'Root Canal Irrigants and Disinfectants', Edondontics: Colleagues for Excellence, Chicago: American Association of Endodontics
Wintarsih O, Partosoedarmo M, and Santoso P 2009, ‘Kebocoran apikal pada irigasi dengan EDTA lebih kecil dibandingkan yang tanpa EDTA', Jurnal PPDGI, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 14-19
Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y 2010, ‘Irrigation in Endodontics', Dent Clin N Am, Vol. 54, pp. 291–312
Sari LORK 2006, ‘Pemanfaatan Obat Tradisional dengan Pertimbangan Manfaat dan Keamanannya', Majalah Ilmu Kefarmasian, Vol. 3, No.1, pp. 1-7
Jain P and Ranjan M 2014, ‘Role of herbs in root canal irrigation-A review', Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, Vol.9, No. 2, pp. 6-10
Poeloengan M and Praptiwi 2010, ‘Uji Aktivitas Antibakteri Ekstrak Kulit Buah Manggis (Gardnia mangostana Linn), Media Litbang Kesehatan, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 65-69
Cheeke PR 2000, ‘Actual and potential applications of Yucca schidigera and Quillaja saponaria saponins in human and animal nutrition', Journal of Animal Science, Vol. 77, pp. 1-10
Pangabdian F, Soetanto S, Suardita K 2012, ‘The Effective Concentration of Red Betel Leaf (Piper crocatum) infusion as root canal irrigant solution', Dental Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 12-16
Ramayanti FE, Sudirman A, Prasetyo EP 2014, ‘The effectiveness of Mangosteen Peel extracts (Garcinia Mangostana L.) againts root canal cleanliness', Journal Media Conservative Dentistry Journal, Vol. 4. No. 1, pp. 12-17
Drukteinis S and Balciuniene I 2006, ‘A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles', Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 70-75
Estrela C, Estrela CRA, Barbin EL, Spanó JCE, Marchesan MA, Pécora JD 2002, ‘Mechanism of Action of Sodium Hypochlorite', Braz Dent J, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 113-117
CDJ by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
